SM vs BMA
Comparison between SM Energy Company (SM, Company) and Banco Macro S.A. (BMA, Company).
SM is from the Energy sector, while BMA is from the Financial Services sector.
5-Year PerformanceBMA has outperformed SM, delivering a return of +53.4% compared to +7.4%
SM vs BMA - Performance Comparison
Key Characteristics
Financial metrics and valuation ratios
SM vs BMA - Historical Returns
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
SM vs BMA - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
| Year | SM | BMA |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | +44.04% | +18.30% |
| 2025 | -51.47% | -14.47% |
| 2024 | +1.24% | +286.66% |
| 2023 | +23.24% | +98.94% |
| 2022 | +10.45% | +24.78% |
| 2021 | +363.97% | -4.10% |
| 2020 | -44.67% | -57.18% |
| 2019 | -26.03% | -13.37% |
| 2018 | -33.18% | -61.04% |
| 2017 | -35.30% | +66.78% |
| 2016 | +73.27% | +12.32% |
| 2015 | -48.64% | +39.04% |
| 2014 | -53.20% | +104.57% |
| 2013 | +52.35% | +27.40% |
| 2012 | -31.45% | -11.21% |
| 2011 | +21.34% | -59.83% |
| 2010 | +63.50% | +73.15% |
| 2009 | +56.80% | +151.68% |
| 2008 | -48.20% | -52.98% |
| 2007 | +10.56% | -21.87% |
| 2006 | -4.22% | +39.32% |
| 2005 | +82.35% | N/A |
| 2004 | +44.17% | N/A |
| 2003 | +11.53% | N/A |
| 2002 | +16.86% | N/A |
| 2001 | -30.19% | N/A |
| 2000 | +185.26% | N/A |
| 1999 | -0.33% | N/A |
SM vs BMA Drawdown Comparison
The maximum drawdown for SM was -98.85%, occurring on Apr 1, 2020. This drawdown has not yet recovered.
The maximum drawdown for BMA was -91.65%, occurring on Jul 21, 2022. Recovery took 1798 trading sessions.
The current SM drawdown is -66.29%. The current BMA drawdown is -6.13%.
| Rank | SM | BMA |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | -98.85% Nov 26, 2013 - Apr 1, 2020 | -91.65% Oct 23, 2017 - Dec 16, 2024 |
| #2 | -82.05% Jun 30, 2008 - Feb 15, 2011 | -81.41% Feb 13, 2007 - Jul 20, 2010 |
| #3 | -57.19% Jan 16, 2001 - Apr 12, 2004 | -77.47% Dec 10, 2010 - Feb 12, 2015 |
| #4 | -51.83% Oct 27, 2011 - Oct 18, 2013 | -65.39% Jan 7, 2025 - Sep 19, 2025 |
| #5 | -31.07% Aug 3, 2011 - Oct 26, 2011 | -43.92% Mar 17, 2015 - Nov 20, 2015 |
| #6 | -30.27% Jul 7, 2000 - Sep 6, 2000 | -23.18% Nov 20, 2015 - Feb 18, 2016 |
| #7 | -29.50% Apr 21, 2006 - May 2, 2008 | -22.89% Oct 19, 2016 - Feb 9, 2017 |
| #8 | -24.07% Nov 9, 1999 - Feb 1, 2000 | -21.80% May 10, 2006 - Nov 8, 2006 |
| #9 | -22.46% Oct 13, 2000 - Nov 21, 2000 | -19.36% Feb 25, 2016 - Apr 19, 2016 |
| #10 | -21.62% Dec 28, 2000 - Jan 16, 2001 | -18.55% Apr 19, 2016 - Jun 17, 2016 |
| #11 | -19.66% Apr 5, 2011 - Jul 15, 2011 | -12.09% Jun 5, 2017 - Aug 14, 2017 |
| #12 | -18.80% Mar 4, 2005 - Jun 1, 2005 | -10.90% Aug 25, 2016 - Oct 19, 2016 |
| #13 | -18.52% Jan 30, 2006 - Apr 18, 2006 | -10.85% Dec 16, 2024 - Jan 2, 2025 |
| #14 | -16.88% Oct 3, 2005 - Dec 5, 2005 | -10.66% Jun 20, 2016 - Jul 13, 2016 |
| #15 | -16.26% Mar 10, 2000 - Apr 4, 2000 | -10.56% Aug 10, 2010 - Sep 14, 2010 |
Correlation
Correlation between SM and BMA is -0.20 which considered as a very weak or no correlation - the stocks move independently of each other.
Dividend Comparison (1999 - 2026)
SM vs BMA dividend yield comparison.
| Year | SM | BMA |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 1.62% | 2.60% |
| 2025 | 5.35% | 2.38% |
| 2024 | 1.91% | 6.10% |
| 2023 | 1.55% | 7.75% |
| 2022 | 0.46% | 7.28% |
| 2021 | 0.07% | 0.00% |
| 2020 | 0.33% | 0.00% |
| 2019 | 0.89% | 6.20% |
| 2018 | 0.65% | 5.05% |
| 2017 | 0.45% | 0.65% |
| 2016 | 0.29% | 1.53% |
| 2015 | 0.51% | 0.00% |
| 2014 | 0.26% | 7.15% |
| 2013 | 0.12% | 0.00% |
| 2012 | 0.19% | 0.00% |
| 2011 | 0.14% | 10.67% |
| 2010 | 0.17% | 1.77% |
| 2009 | 0.29% | 2.18% |
| 2008 | 0.49% | 7.34% |
| 2007 | 0.26% | 1.96% |
| 2006 | 0.27% | 1.99% |
| 2005 | 0.27% | 0.00% |
| 2004 | 0.24% | 0.00% |
| 2003 | 0.35% | 0.00% |
| 2002 | 0.40% | 0.00% |
| 2001 | 0.47% | 0.00% |
| 2000 | 0.32% | 0.00% |
| 1999 | 0.20% | 0.00% |
Select Stocks to Compare
More Comparisons
Compare with similar stocks