SLG vs CPK
Comparison between SL Green Realty Corp (SLG, Company) and Chesapeake Utilities Corp (CPK, Company).
SLG is from the Real Estate sector, while CPK is from the Utilities sector.
5-Year PerformanceCPK has outperformed SLG, delivering a return of +3.7% compared to -5.3%
SLG vs CPK - Performance Comparison
Key Characteristics
Financial metrics and valuation ratios
SLG vs CPK - Historical Returns
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
SLG vs CPK - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
| Year | SLG | CPK |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | -4.52% | +2.67% |
| 2025 | -29.51% | +6.45% |
| 2024 | +55.60% | +17.28% |
| 2023 | +46.72% | -8.01% |
| 2022 | -53.10% | -15.76% |
| 2021 | +27.82% | +40.10% |
| 2020 | -26.79% | +16.81% |
| 2019 | +22.95% | +22.46% |
| 2018 | -18.59% | +6.91% |
| 2017 | -4.14% | +21.25% |
| 2016 | +0.52% | +26.61% |
| 2015 | -4.81% | +16.32% |
| 2014 | +31.93% | -14.98% |
| 2013 | +19.77% | +32.04% |
| 2012 | +14.04% | +7.91% |
| 2011 | -2.84% | +7.95% |
| 2010 | +38.88% | +34.61% |
| 2009 | +110.07% | +7.70% |
| 2008 | -70.73% | +6.51% |
| 2007 | -28.17% | +8.36% |
| 2006 | +74.74% | +3.76% |
| 2005 | +32.31% | +20.23% |
| 2004 | +53.15% | +7.15% |
| 2003 | +36.32% | +47.76% |
| 2002 | +9.71% | -2.27% |
| 2001 | +15.82% | +12.24% |
| 2000 | +37.10% | +7.36% |
| 1999 | +17.56% | +5.71% |
SLG vs CPK Drawdown Comparison
The maximum drawdown for SLG was -94.03%, occurring on Mar 6, 2009. Recovery took 2043 trading sessions.
The maximum drawdown for CPK was -44.55%, occurring on Sep 25, 2014. Recovery took 623 trading sessions.
The current SLG drawdown is -44.28%. The current CPK drawdown is -7.73%.
| Rank | SLG | CPK |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | -94.03% Feb 7, 2007 - Mar 20, 2015 | -44.55% Jul 1, 2014 - Dec 19, 2016 |
| #2 | -79.45% Mar 20, 2015 - Mar 23, 2023 | -38.67% Dec 31, 2021 - Oct 3, 2025 |
| #3 | -22.23% Jun 25, 2002 - May 22, 2003 | -34.04% Jul 12, 2007 - Jun 29, 2009 |
| #4 | -16.51% Apr 2, 2004 - Jul 2, 2004 | -27.61% Feb 13, 2020 - Nov 2, 2020 |
| #5 | -15.30% Jul 28, 2000 - May 22, 2001 | -21.78% Nov 30, 2017 - Jul 5, 2018 |
| #6 | -12.96% Dec 31, 2004 - Apr 29, 2005 | -21.38% Dec 29, 2003 - Nov 11, 2004 |
| #7 | -9.09% Mar 1, 2000 - Mar 23, 2000 | -19.47% Oct 5, 2005 - Jul 18, 2006 |
| #8 | -8.24% Nov 21, 2006 - Jan 16, 2007 | -18.35% Jun 7, 2002 - May 7, 2003 |
| #9 | -8.24% Aug 2, 2005 - Nov 10, 2005 | -16.06% Aug 4, 2009 - Jul 27, 2010 |
| #10 | -8.15% May 5, 2000 - Jun 20, 2000 | -15.60% Jul 18, 2006 - May 16, 2007 |
| #11 | -7.75% Jul 8, 2003 - Oct 1, 2003 | -15.22% Dec 14, 2018 - Mar 11, 2019 |
| #12 | -7.59% Aug 15, 2001 - Sep 27, 2001 | -14.67% Apr 15, 2005 - May 10, 2005 |
| #13 | -7.53% Mar 29, 2006 - May 10, 2006 | -14.34% Aug 1, 2013 - Dec 19, 2013 |
| #14 | -6.79% Oct 20, 2003 - Dec 11, 2003 | -14.30% Oct 17, 2012 - Mar 1, 2013 |
| #15 | -6.31% Sep 28, 2001 - Jan 14, 2002 | -14.12% Dec 8, 1999 - Nov 30, 2000 |
Correlation
Correlation between SLG and CPK is 0.44 which considered as a weak positive correlation - the stocks show a slight tendency to move together.
Dividend Comparison (1999 - 2026)
SLG vs CPK dividend yield comparison.
| Year | SLG | CPK |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 1.40% | 0.54% |
| 2025 | 6.18% | 2.16% |
| 2024 | 4.43% | 2.07% |
| 2023 | 7.15% | 2.18% |
| 2022 | 10.94% | 1.76% |
| 2021 | 5.09% | 1.29% |
| 2020 | 7.81% | 1.59% |
| 2019 | 3.74% | 1.65% |
| 2018 | 4.16% | 1.77% |
| 2017 | 3.11% | 1.63% |
| 2016 | 2.73% | 1.80% |
| 2015 | 2.23% | 2.00% |
| 2014 | 1.76% | 2.68% |
| 2013 | 1.61% | 2.53% |
| 2012 | 1.41% | 3.17% |
| 2011 | 0.83% | 3.15% |
| 2010 | 0.59% | 3.14% |
| 2009 | 1.34% | 3.90% |
| 2008 | 10.57% | 3.84% |
| 2007 | 3.09% | 3.69% |
| 2006 | 1.88% | 3.77% |
| 2005 | 2.91% | 3.70% |
| 2004 | 3.37% | 4.18% |
| 2003 | 4.62% | 4.22% |
| 2002 | 5.67% | 6.01% |
| 2001 | 5.23% | 5.53% |
| 2000 | 5.25% | 5.74% |
| 1999 | 1.66% | 1.41% |
Select Stocks to Compare
More Comparisons
Compare with similar stocks