SIMO vs FRT
Comparison between Silicon Motion Technology Corp (SIMO, Company) and Federal Realty Investment Trust. (FRT, Company).
SIMO is from the Technology sector, while FRT is from the Real Estate sector.
5-Year PerformanceSIMO has outperformed FRT, delivering a return of +41.2% compared to +5.3%
SIMO vs FRT - Performance Comparison
Key Characteristics
Financial metrics and valuation ratios
SIMO vs FRT - Historical Returns
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
SIMO vs FRT - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
| Year | SIMO | FRT |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | +245.00% | +27.19% |
| 2025 | +74.94% | -4.27% |
| 2024 | -6.52% | +10.55% |
| 2023 | -3.68% | +4.98% |
| 2022 | -30.31% | -22.89% |
| 2021 | +105.78% | +71.67% |
| 2020 | -1.68% | -28.65% |
| 2019 | +50.55% | +14.66% |
| 2018 | -35.89% | -8.78% |
| 2017 | +20.42% | -4.46% |
| 2016 | +39.59% | +0.62% |
| 2015 | +25.41% | +10.42% |
| 2014 | +73.49% | +35.92% |
| 2013 | +1.24% | -0.85% |
| 2012 | -31.63% | +18.73% |
| 2011 | +364.40% | +17.07% |
| 2010 | +21.78% | +20.40% |
| 2009 | +38.06% | +19.49% |
| 2008 | -86.73% | -21.50% |
| 2007 | +12.75% | +0.03% |
| 2006 | +32.03% | +42.57% |
| 2005 | +14.29% | +23.58% |
| 2004 | N/A | +39.95% |
| 2003 | N/A | +43.36% |
| 2002 | N/A | +31.72% |
| 2001 | N/A | +31.86% |
| 2000 | N/A | +10.87% |
| 1999 | N/A | +2.73% |
SIMO vs FRT Drawdown Comparison
The maximum drawdown for SIMO was -93.19%, occurring on Mar 5, 2009. Recovery took 1783 trading sessions.
The maximum drawdown for FRT was -57.45%, occurring on Mar 2, 2009. Recovery took 855 trading sessions.
The current SIMO drawdown is -4.52%. The current FRT drawdown is -0.96%.
| Rank | SIMO | FRT |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | -93.19% Jul 13, 2007 - Aug 12, 2014 | -57.45% Oct 5, 2007 - Feb 28, 2011 |
| #2 | -56.53% May 5, 2022 - Sep 11, 2025 | -56.51% Aug 1, 2016 - May 21, 2026 |
| #3 | -48.01% Aug 21, 2018 - Feb 4, 2021 | -25.68% Apr 1, 2004 - Sep 7, 2004 |
| #4 | -40.21% Jun 25, 2015 - Mar 23, 2016 | -22.95% Feb 7, 2007 - Oct 5, 2007 |
| #5 | -31.23% Dec 31, 2021 - May 5, 2022 | -17.85% May 15, 2013 - Mar 31, 2014 |
| #6 | -30.02% Sep 7, 2016 - Jun 8, 2017 | -16.59% Jul 22, 2011 - Aug 30, 2011 |
| #7 | -29.82% Feb 9, 2006 - Sep 15, 2006 | -16.31% Mar 23, 2015 - Nov 5, 2015 |
| #8 | -26.26% Feb 25, 2026 - Apr 24, 2026 | -15.37% Apr 12, 2002 - Dec 3, 2002 |
| #9 | -25.66% Jun 8, 2017 - Jan 2, 2018 | -15.28% Nov 4, 1999 - Jan 6, 2000 |
| #10 | -25.65% Sep 4, 2014 - Jan 27, 2015 | -14.30% Aug 22, 2001 - Nov 16, 2001 |
| #11 | -24.43% Mar 21, 2007 - Jul 9, 2007 | -14.14% Mar 29, 2006 - Sep 12, 2006 |
| #12 | -23.48% Oct 4, 2005 - Jan 30, 2006 | -13.04% Jul 28, 2005 - Nov 22, 2005 |
| #13 | -23.15% Jan 9, 2018 - Jul 26, 2018 | -11.97% Jan 10, 2000 - Apr 6, 2000 |
| #14 | -21.70% Oct 27, 2025 - Jan 6, 2026 | -11.14% May 18, 2000 - May 21, 2001 |
| #15 | -17.96% Aug 4, 2021 - Dec 7, 2021 | -10.99% Dec 30, 2004 - Apr 22, 2005 |
Correlation
Correlation between SIMO and FRT is 0.64 which considered as a moderate positive correlation - the stocks show some tendency to move together.
Dividend Comparison (1999 - 2026)
SIMO vs FRT dividend yield comparison.
| Year | SIMO | FRT |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 0.31% | 1.81% |
| 2025 | 2.16% | 4.39% |
| 2024 | 3.70% | 2.93% |
| 2023 | 0.82% | 4.21% |
| 2022 | 2.31% | 4.26% |
| 2021 | 1.62% | 3.13% |
| 2020 | 2.89% | 4.96% |
| 2019 | 2.45% | 3.22% |
| 2018 | 3.45% | 3.42% |
| 2017 | 1.68% | 2.98% |
| 2016 | 1.51% | 2.70% |
| 2015 | 1.88% | 2.48% |
| 2014 | 2.49% | 2.47% |
| 2013 | 4.24% | 2.98% |
| 2012 | 0.00% | 3.48% |
| 2011 | 0.00% | 3.00% |
| 2010 | 0.00% | 3.41% |
| 2009 | 0.00% | 3.87% |
| 2008 | 0.00% | 4.06% |
| 2007 | 0.00% | 2.88% |
| 2006 | 0.00% | 2.89% |
| 2005 | 0.00% | 3.91% |
| 2004 | 0.00% | 3.85% |
| 2003 | 0.00% | 5.08% |
| 2002 | 0.00% | 6.86% |
| 2001 | 0.00% | 8.26% |
| 2000 | 0.00% | 9.68% |
| 1999 | 0.00% | 2.39% |
Select Stocks to Compare
More Comparisons
Compare with similar stocks