SILC vs NEO

Comparison between Silicom Ltd (SILC, Company) and Neogenomics Inc (NEO, Company).

SILC is from the Technology sector, while NEO is from the Healthcare sector.

5-Year PerformanceSILC has outperformed NEO, delivering a return of -1.7% compared to -21.3%

SILC vs NEO - Performance Comparison

Log

Key Characteristics

Financial metrics and valuation ratios

Metric	SILC(COMPANY)	NEO(COMPANY)
Market Cap	$253M	$252M
Max Drawdown	98.80%	91.92%
Sharpe Ratio	1.46	1.41
5Y Beta	0.98	1.23
Industry	Communication Equipment	Diagnostics & Research
P/E Ratio	-22.01	-2.34
Forward P/E	10.72	222.22
PEG Ratio	1.41	-0.06
Debt to Equity	0.00%	40.86%
Free Cash Flow Yield	-1.33%	-8.64%
P/S Ratio	3.82	1.73
P/B Ratio	2.33	1.34

Market Cap

Winner

SILC

$253M

NEO

$252M

Max Drawdown

SILC

98.80%

Winner

NEO

91.92%

Sharpe Ratio

Winner

SILC

1.46

NEO

1.41

5Y Beta

Winner

SILC

0.98

NEO

1.23

Industry

SILC

Communication Equipment

NEO

Diagnostics & Research

P/E Ratio

Winner

SILC

-22.01

NEO

-2.34

Forward P/E

Winner

SILC

10.72

NEO

222.22

PEG Ratio

SILC

1.41

Winner

NEO

-0.06

Debt to Equity

Winner

SILC

0.00%

NEO

40.86%

Free Cash Flow Yield

Winner

SILC

-1.33%

NEO

-8.64%

P/S Ratio

SILC

3.82

Winner

NEO

1.73

P/B Ratio

SILC

2.33

Winner

NEO

1.34

SILC vs NEO - Historical Returns

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

Period	SILC	NEO
1 month	-4.18%	-7.27%
3 months	+36.26%	+52.61%
6 months	+148.30%	+5.37%
1 year	+146.17%	+103.41%
5 years(CAGR)	-1.69%	-21.29%
10 years(CAGR)	+0.88%	+3.73%
Max(CAGR)	+12.12%	+16.52%

Winner

SILC

-4.18%

NEO

-7.27%

SILC

+36.26%

Winner

NEO

+52.61%

Winner

SILC

+148.30%

NEO

+5.37%

Winner

SILC

+146.17%

NEO

+103.41%

5Y(CAGR)

Winner

SILC

-1.69%

NEO

-21.29%

10Y(CAGR)

SILC

+0.88%

Winner

NEO

+3.73%

Max(CAGR)

SILC

+12.12%

Winner

NEO

+16.52%

SILC vs NEO - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

Year	SILC	NEO
2026	+177.13%	+11.73%
2025	-4.36%	-28.68%
2024	-10.92%	+3.32%
2023	-57.52%	+78.00%
2022	-16.10%	-73.81%
2021	+24.34%	-37.67%
2020	+25.22%	+85.34%
2019	-7.17%	+133.25%
2018	-53.14%	+44.61%
2017	+77.11%	+2.67%
2016	+32.00%	+13.36%
2015	-9.51%	+92.42%
2014	-21.09%	+13.01%
2013	+155.86%	+36.60%
2012	-0.72%	+74.65%
2011	-7.10%	+12.90%
2010	+115.87%	-13.33%
2009	+84.00%	+134.38%
2008	-70.67%	-41.90%
2007	+58.93%	-32.92%
2006	+10.62%	+681.25%
2005	+215.33%	-24.00%
2004	+62.87%	-41.86%
2003	+381.82%	N/A
2002	-65.12%	N/A
2001	-73.10%	N/A
2000	-30.60%	N/A
1999	+106.31%	N/A

SILC vs NEO Drawdown Comparison

The maximum drawdown for SILC was -98.80%, occurring on Jan 8, 2003. Recovery took 1789 trading sessions.

The maximum drawdown for NEO was -91.92%, occurring on Jul 31, 2025. This drawdown has not yet recovered.

The current SILC drawdown is -48.72%. The current NEO drawdown is -78.06%.

Rank	SILC	NEO
#1	-98.80% Mar 1, 2000 - Apr 16, 2007	-91.92% Feb 12, 2021 - Jul 31, 2025
#2	-88.41% Sep 12, 2007 - Mar 8, 2013	-85.29% Mar 17, 2004 - Aug 7, 2006
#3	-84.76% Jan 3, 2018 - Aug 5, 2024	-72.14% Nov 15, 2006 - Jul 27, 2009
#4	-64.18% Mar 4, 2014 - Oct 19, 2017	-52.38% Jul 27, 2009 - Jul 30, 2012
#5	-42.41% Dec 8, 1999 - Jan 18, 2000	-49.64% Apr 1, 2013 - Jan 10, 2014
#6	-34.94% Nov 26, 1999 - Nov 30, 1999	-40.63% Feb 12, 2020 - Jul 6, 2020
#7	-30.64% Nov 30, 1999 - Dec 8, 1999	-40.57% Sep 12, 2014 - Jul 9, 2015
#8	-29.52% Apr 24, 2007 - Sep 5, 2007	-39.24% Nov 1, 2018 - Feb 22, 2019
#9	-27.29% Jul 16, 2013 - Oct 21, 2013	-35.79% Sep 25, 2017 - May 17, 2018
#10	-23.20% Jan 19, 2000 - Feb 7, 2000	-32.82% Jan 14, 2014 - Jul 14, 2014
#11	-17.19% Nov 5, 1999 - Nov 16, 1999	-32.48% Dec 29, 2015 - May 9, 2016
#12	-16.41% Feb 15, 2000 - Mar 1, 2000	-27.74% Aug 21, 2019 - Dec 6, 2019
#13	-10.52% Nov 21, 2017 - Jan 3, 2018	-26.05% Dec 12, 2016 - Aug 31, 2017
#14	-10.05% Apr 2, 2013 - Apr 23, 2013	-24.52% Sep 25, 2012 - Feb 15, 2013
#15	-9.17% Nov 12, 2013 - Dec 27, 2013	-23.82% Jul 13, 2016 - Nov 23, 2016