SILC vs CDR-P-B
Comparison between Silicom Ltd (SILC, Company) and Cedar Realty Trust Inc (CDR-P-B, Company).
5-Year PerformanceCDR-P-B has outperformed SILC, delivering a return of +6.0% compared to +0.5%
SILC vs CDR-P-B - Performance Comparison
Key Characteristics
Financial metrics and valuation ratios
SILC vs CDR-P-B - Historical Returns
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
SILC vs CDR-P-B - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
| Year | SILC | CDR-P-B |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | +230.37% | +12.65% |
| 2025 | -4.36% | +27.90% |
| 2024 | -10.92% | +30.88% |
| 2023 | -57.52% | +2.62% |
| 2022 | -16.10% | -35.98% |
| 2021 | +24.34% | +26.20% |
| 2020 | +25.22% | -6.75% |
| 2019 | -7.17% | +17.44% |
| 2018 | -53.14% | -1.71% |
| 2017 | +77.11% | +11.30% |
| 2016 | +32.00% | +4.50% |
| 2015 | -9.51% | +1.97% |
| 2014 | -21.09% | +22.28% |
| 2013 | +155.86% | +1.86% |
| 2012 | -0.72% | +9.28% |
| 2011 | -7.10% | N/A |
| 2010 | +115.87% | N/A |
| 2009 | +84.00% | N/A |
| 2008 | -70.67% | N/A |
| 2007 | +58.93% | N/A |
| 2006 | +10.62% | N/A |
| 2005 | +215.33% | N/A |
| 2004 | +62.87% | N/A |
| 2003 | +381.82% | N/A |
| 2002 | -65.12% | N/A |
| 2001 | -73.10% | N/A |
| 2000 | -30.60% | N/A |
| 1999 | +106.31% | N/A |
SILC vs CDR-P-B Drawdown Comparison
The maximum drawdown for SILC was -98.80%, occurring on Jan 8, 2003. Recovery took 1789 trading sessions.
The maximum drawdown for CDR-P-B was -70.52%, occurring on Mar 23, 2020. Recovery took 229 trading sessions.
The current SILC drawdown is -38.87%. The current CDR-P-B drawdown is -11.44%.
| Rank | SILC | CDR-P-B |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | -98.80% Mar 1, 2000 - Apr 16, 2007 | -70.52% Feb 11, 2020 - Jan 7, 2021 |
| #2 | -88.41% Sep 12, 2007 - Mar 8, 2013 | -70.38% Feb 28, 2022 - Feb 11, 2025 |
| #3 | -84.76% Jan 3, 2018 - Aug 5, 2024 | -16.68% Feb 11, 2025 - Aug 22, 2025 |
| #4 | -64.18% Mar 4, 2014 - Oct 19, 2017 | -15.10% May 8, 2013 - Apr 23, 2014 |
| #5 | -42.41% Dec 8, 1999 - Jan 18, 2000 | -12.61% May 7, 2026 - Jun 16, 2026 |
| #6 | -34.94% Nov 26, 1999 - Nov 30, 1999 | -10.93% Jan 19, 2018 - Jul 13, 2018 |
| #7 | -30.64% Nov 30, 1999 - Dec 8, 1999 | -8.80% Aug 21, 2018 - Jan 30, 2019 |
| #8 | -29.52% Apr 24, 2007 - Sep 5, 2007 | -8.20% Aug 9, 2016 - Apr 10, 2017 |
| #9 | -27.29% Jul 16, 2013 - Oct 21, 2013 | -7.89% Jan 30, 2019 - Mar 11, 2019 |
| #10 | -23.20% Jan 19, 2000 - Feb 7, 2000 | -7.62% Mar 31, 2026 - May 1, 2026 |
| #11 | -17.19% Nov 5, 1999 - Nov 16, 1999 | -6.83% Jul 1, 2015 - Nov 5, 2015 |
| #12 | -16.41% Feb 15, 2000 - Mar 1, 2000 | -6.02% Mar 6, 2026 - Mar 18, 2026 |
| #13 | -10.52% Nov 21, 2017 - Jan 3, 2018 | -5.82% Dec 17, 2025 - Feb 9, 2026 |
| #14 | -10.05% Apr 2, 2013 - Apr 23, 2013 | -5.61% Nov 5, 2015 - Feb 19, 2016 |
| #15 | -9.17% Nov 12, 2013 - Dec 27, 2013 | -5.42% Nov 11, 2025 - Dec 17, 2025 |
Correlation
Correlation between SILC and CDR-P-B is -0.08 which considered as a very weak or no correlation - the stocks move independently of each other.
Dividend Comparison (2012 - 2026)
SILC vs CDR-P-B dividend yield comparison.
| Year | SILC | CDR-P-B |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 0.00% | 4.65% |
| 2025 | 0.00% | 10.16% |
| 2024 | 0.00% | 12.08% |
| 2023 | 0.00% | 14.02% |
| 2022 | 0.00% | 12.49% |
| 2021 | 0.00% | 7.02% |
| 2020 | 0.00% | 8.38% |
| 2019 | 0.00% | 7.23% |
| 2018 | 0.00% | 7.86% |
| 2017 | 1.43% | 7.17% |
| 2016 | 2.43% | 7.44% |
| 2015 | 3.30% | 7.34% |
| 2014 | 2.84% | 6.90% |
| 2013 | 1.20% | 7.88% |
| 2012 | 0.00% | 3.71% |
Select Stocks to Compare
More Comparisons
Compare with similar stocks