SHM vs NEA
Comparison between SPDR Nuveen Bloomberg Short Term Municipal Bond ETF (SHM, ETF) and Nuveen AMT-Free Quality Municipal Income Fund (NEA, ETF).
5-Year PerformanceSHM has outperformed NEA, delivering a return of +0.9% compared to +0.4%
SHM vs NEA - Performance Comparison
Key Characteristics
Financial metrics and valuation ratios
SHM vs NEA - Historical Returns
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
SHM vs NEA - Annual Returns (2002 - 2026)
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
| Year | SHM | NEA |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | +0.45% | +2.27% |
| 2025 | +3.86% | +10.42% |
| 2024 | +1.22% | +9.00% |
| 2023 | +2.81% | -0.58% |
| 2022 | -3.80% | -23.00% |
| 2021 | -0.37% | +8.45% |
| 2020 | +2.53% | +10.47% |
| 2019 | +3.60% | +20.56% |
| 2018 | +1.42% | -5.87% |
| 2017 | +1.01% | +9.35% |
| 2016 | -0.49% | +1.99% |
| 2015 | +1.13% | +6.25% |
| 2014 | +1.01% | +21.40% |
| 2013 | +1.27% | -16.42% |
| 2012 | +1.32% | +6.78% |
| 2011 | +3.76% | +17.35% |
| 2010 | +1.19% | +1.80% |
| 2009 | +4.28% | +34.36% |
| 2008 | +5.83% | -24.81% |
| 2007 | +1.61% | +5.52% |
| 2006 | N/A | +11.55% |
| 2005 | N/A | +4.15% |
| 2004 | N/A | -4.83% |
| 2003 | N/A | +8.59% |
| 2002 | N/A | +0.07% |
SHM vs NEA Drawdown Comparison
The maximum drawdown for SHM was -11.61%, occurring on Mar 19, 2020. Recovery took 50 trading sessions.
The maximum drawdown for NEA was -43.81%, occurring on Oct 10, 2008. Recovery took 405 trading sessions.
The current SHM drawdown is -0.65%. The current NEA drawdown is -4.75%.
| Rank | SHM | NEA |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | -11.61% Mar 9, 2020 - May 19, 2020 | -43.81% Feb 12, 2008 - Sep 21, 2009 |
| #2 | -6.97% Sep 23, 2008 - Dec 5, 2008 | -36.56% Sep 15, 2021 - Oct 23, 2023 |
| #3 | -6.67% Aug 3, 2021 - Sep 5, 2024 | -25.03% Mar 6, 2020 - Aug 10, 2020 |
| #4 | -3.50% Aug 31, 2010 - May 6, 2011 | -23.18% Nov 30, 2012 - Jan 7, 2015 |
| #5 | -3.07% Feb 13, 2008 - Mar 18, 2008 | -18.08% Sep 10, 2010 - Dec 2, 2011 |
| #6 | -2.70% Aug 22, 2016 - Aug 2, 2017 | -16.44% Mar 5, 2004 - Jun 29, 2005 |
| #7 | -2.63% Apr 23, 2013 - Oct 23, 2013 | -12.37% Jul 8, 2016 - Mar 7, 2019 |
| #8 | -2.07% Sep 5, 2017 - Jan 11, 2019 | -12.29% Feb 12, 2007 - Jan 15, 2008 |
| #9 | -1.87% Feb 13, 2009 - Apr 16, 2009 | -10.90% Jul 28, 2005 - Jul 12, 2006 |
| #10 | -1.75% Mar 18, 2008 - Aug 15, 2008 | -10.61% Jul 14, 2003 - Dec 31, 2003 |
| #11 | -1.67% Sep 6, 2011 - Jan 11, 2012 | -9.23% Feb 2, 2015 - Dec 24, 2015 |
| #12 | -1.67% Apr 4, 2025 - Jun 12, 2025 | -9.15% Oct 7, 2009 - Feb 2, 2010 |
| #13 | -1.31% Oct 3, 2024 - Feb 25, 2025 | -6.54% Mar 12, 2012 - May 16, 2012 |
| #14 | -1.24% Sep 17, 2008 - Sep 23, 2008 | -4.92% Jan 27, 2021 - Apr 13, 2021 |
| #15 | -1.13% Feb 26, 2026 - Mar 24, 2026 | -4.73% Nov 30, 2006 - Feb 12, 2007 |
Correlation
Correlation between SHM and NEA is 0.95 which considered as a very strong positive correlation - the stocks move almost identically together.
Dividend Comparison (2003 - 2026)
SHM vs NEA dividend yield comparison.
| Year | SHM | NEA |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 0.89% | 2.34% |
| 2025 | 2.61% | 7.36% |
| 2024 | 2.06% | 6.63% |
| 2023 | 1.15% | 3.95% |
| 2022 | 0.69% | 5.49% |
| 2021 | 0.86% | 4.50% |
| 2020 | 1.24% | 4.45% |
| 2019 | 1.40% | 4.46% |
| 2018 | 1.23% | 5.40% |
| 2017 | 1.06% | 5.33% |
| 2016 | 0.94% | 5.70% |
| 2015 | 0.92% | 5.71% |
| 2014 | 0.93% | 5.95% |
| 2013 | 0.97% | 6.24% |
| 2012 | 1.40% | 5.65% |
| 2011 | 1.60% | 5.64% |
| 2010 | 1.91% | 6.09% |
| 2009 | 2.03% | 5.37% |
| 2008 | 2.59% | 6.81% |
| 2007 | 0.72% | 4.93% |
| 2006 | 0.00% | 5.10% |
| 2005 | 0.00% | 5.93% |
| 2004 | 0.00% | 6.81% |
| 2003 | 0.00% | 6.11% |
Select Stocks to Compare
More Comparisons
Compare with similar stocks