SCVL vs FDMT

Comparison between Shoe Carnival Inc (SCVL, Company) and 4D Molecular Therapeutics Inc (FDMT, Company).

SCVL is from the Consumer Cyclical sector, while FDMT is from the Healthcare sector.

5-Year PerformanceSCVL has outperformed FDMT, delivering a return of -10.9% compared to -20.8%

SCVL vs FDMT - Performance Comparison

Log

Key Characteristics

Financial metrics and valuation ratios

Metric	SCVL(COMPANY)	FDMT(COMPANY)
Market Cap	$456M	$456M
Max Drawdown	82.02%	95.23%
Sharpe Ratio	-0.04	1.14
5Y Beta	1.28	1.35
Industry	Apparel Retail	Biotechnology
P/E Ratio	12.10	-2.59
Forward P/E	11.26	N/A
PEG Ratio	0.95	N/A
Dividend Yield	3.71%	N/A
5Y Dividends CAGR	30.30%	N/A
5Y EPS CAGR	-3.74%	N/A
Debt to Equity	0.00%	0.00%
Free Cash Flow Yield	13.64%	-28.45%
P/S Ratio	0.41	5.17
P/B Ratio	0.68	1.01

Market Cap

Winner

SCVL

$456M

FDMT

$456M

Max Drawdown

Winner

SCVL

82.02%

FDMT

95.23%

Sharpe Ratio

SCVL

-0.04

Winner

FDMT

1.14

5Y Beta

Winner

SCVL

1.28

FDMT

1.35

Industry

SCVL

Apparel Retail

FDMT

Biotechnology

P/E Ratio

SCVL

12.10

Winner

FDMT

-2.59

Forward P/E

SCVL

11.26

FDMT

N/A

PEG Ratio

SCVL

0.95

FDMT

N/A

Dividend Yield

SCVL

3.71%

FDMT

N/A

5Y Dividends CAGR

SCVL

30.30%

FDMT

N/A

5Y EPS CAGR

SCVL

-3.74%

FDMT

N/A

Debt to Equity

SCVL

0.00%

FDMT

0.00%

Free Cash Flow Yield

Winner

SCVL

13.64%

FDMT

-28.45%

P/S Ratio

Winner

SCVL

0.41

FDMT

5.17

P/B Ratio

Winner

SCVL

0.68

FDMT

1.01

SCVL vs FDMT - Historical Returns

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

Period	SCVL	FDMT
1 month	+6.56%	-14.60%
3 months	-3.33%	+4.50%
6 months	-5.57%	-18.54%
1 year	-9.17%	+96.22%
5 years(CAGR)	-10.88%	-20.77%
10 years(CAGR)	+5.15%	N/A
Max(CAGR)	+7.38%	-24.19%

Winner

SCVL

+6.56%

FDMT

-14.60%

SCVL

-3.33%

Winner

FDMT

+4.50%

Winner

SCVL

-5.57%

FDMT

-18.54%

SCVL

-9.17%

Winner

FDMT

+96.22%

5Y(CAGR)

Winner

SCVL

-10.88%

FDMT

-20.77%

10Y(CAGR)

SCVL

+5.15%

FDMT

N/A

Max(CAGR)

Winner

SCVL

+7.38%

FDMT

-24.19%

SCVL vs FDMT - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

Year	SCVL	FDMT
2026	+1.12%	+20.63%
2025	-46.37%	+28.64%
2024	+14.28%	-73.79%
2023	+34.72%	-1.84%
2022	-40.17%	-1.90%
2021	+112.96%	-41.79%
2020	+6.43%	+2.35%
2019	+7.02%	N/A
2018	+25.30%	N/A
2017	-0.56%	N/A
2016	+17.64%	N/A
2015	-6.88%	N/A
2014	-10.73%	N/A
2013	+43.10%	N/A
2012	+27.31%	N/A
2011	-5.93%	N/A
2010	+31.90%	N/A
2009	+111.46%	N/A
2008	-32.75%	N/A
2007	-55.09%	N/A
2006	+43.96%	N/A
2005	+70.59%	N/A
2004	-25.93%	N/A
2003	+20.41%	N/A
2002	+3.39%	N/A
2001	+111.33%	N/A
2000	-31.01%	N/A
1999	+0.60%	N/A

SCVL vs FDMT Drawdown Comparison

The maximum drawdown for SCVL was -82.02%, occurring on Mar 5, 2009. Recovery took 1367 trading sessions.

The maximum drawdown for FDMT was -95.23%, occurring on Apr 8, 2025. This drawdown has not yet recovered.

The current SCVL drawdown is -60.22%. The current FDMT drawdown is -83.24%.

Rank	SCVL	FDMT
#1	-82.02% Mar 22, 2007 - Aug 22, 2012	-95.23% Feb 11, 2021 - Apr 8, 2025
#2	-69.54% Apr 7, 2000 - Aug 29, 2001	-23.56% Dec 18, 2020 - Jan 19, 2021
#3	-68.53% Aug 31, 2018 - Jan 14, 2021	-14.25% Jan 19, 2021 - Feb 4, 2021
#4	-65.15% Sep 19, 2024 - Mar 30, 2026	-5.58% Feb 5, 2021 - Feb 11, 2021
#5	-55.00% Nov 22, 2021 - Aug 15, 2024	-5.11% Dec 11, 2020 - Dec 18, 2020
#6	-53.92% Jul 1, 2002 - Jul 5, 2005	N/A
#7	-50.60% Nov 23, 2016 - May 25, 2018	N/A
#8	-43.68% Jul 28, 2005 - Mar 22, 2006	N/A
#9	-41.35% Jan 3, 2014 - Mar 30, 2015	N/A
#10	-38.39% Jun 26, 2015 - Aug 23, 2016	N/A
#11	-34.46% Aug 29, 2001 - Dec 6, 2001	N/A
#12	-31.23% May 9, 2006 - Oct 26, 2006	N/A
#13	-29.71% Nov 19, 1999 - Apr 6, 2000	N/A
#14	-21.21% Aug 24, 2021 - Nov 15, 2021	N/A
#15	-18.20% Jun 24, 2021 - Aug 24, 2021	N/A