RPM vs CSL
Comparison between RPM International Inc (RPM, Company) and Carlisle Companies Inc (CSL, Company).
RPM is from the Basic Materials sector, while CSL is from the Industrials sector.
5-Year PerformanceCSL has outperformed RPM, delivering a return of +14.7% compared to +5.5%
RPM vs CSL - Performance Comparison
Key Characteristics
Financial metrics and valuation ratios
RPM vs CSL - Historical Returns
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
RPM vs CSL - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
| Year | RPM | CSL |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | +5.96% | +8.28% |
| 2025 | -11.18% | -11.66% |
| 2024 | +13.98% | +20.08% |
| 2023 | +16.32% | +35.04% |
| 2022 | +0.94% | -3.01% |
| 2021 | +15.53% | +62.98% |
| 2020 | +21.81% | -3.31% |
| 2019 | +36.20% | +62.36% |
| 2018 | +12.62% | -12.87% |
| 2017 | -1.04% | +5.48% |
| 2016 | +27.73% | +29.32% |
| 2015 | -10.48% | -0.33% |
| 2014 | +26.23% | +16.22% |
| 2013 | +40.24% | +32.88% |
| 2012 | +23.98% | +30.90% |
| 2011 | +14.30% | +11.21% |
| 2010 | +9.65% | +15.36% |
| 2009 | +57.07% | +64.68% |
| 2008 | -32.18% | -43.52% |
| 2007 | +0.65% | -5.44% |
| 2006 | +24.41% | +13.24% |
| 2005 | -6.89% | +10.86% |
| 2004 | +23.23% | +8.11% |
| 2003 | +11.59% | +44.81% |
| 2002 | +7.89% | +17.03% |
| 2001 | +72.60% | -9.48% |
| 2000 | -8.94% | +26.79% |
| 1999 | -16.82% | +10.53% |
RPM vs CSL Drawdown Comparison
The maximum drawdown for RPM was -61.70%, occurring on Mar 6, 2009. Recovery took 650 trading sessions.
The maximum drawdown for CSL was -64.55%, occurring on Nov 20, 2008. Recovery took 918 trading sessions.
The current RPM drawdown is -20.16%. The current CSL drawdown is -25.00%.
| Rank | RPM | CSL |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | -61.70% Jun 5, 2008 - Jan 3, 2011 | -64.55% Sep 4, 2007 - Apr 26, 2011 |
| #2 | -46.38% May 15, 2002 - Jan 5, 2004 | -45.55% Jun 29, 2000 - Oct 8, 2003 |
| #3 | -38.72% Dec 31, 2019 - Jun 3, 2020 | -39.12% May 10, 2011 - Feb 21, 2012 |
| #4 | -34.49% Nov 1, 1999 - Oct 12, 2001 | -38.68% Jan 2, 2020 - Mar 25, 2021 |
| #5 | -31.97% Nov 25, 2024 - Mar 20, 2026 | -37.71% Oct 14, 2024 - Nov 20, 2025 |
| #6 | -29.75% Apr 7, 2011 - Dec 23, 2011 | -34.51% Aug 18, 2022 - Dec 15, 2023 |
| #7 | -26.59% Jul 23, 2007 - May 15, 2008 | -27.39% Aug 29, 2018 - Apr 18, 2019 |
| #8 | -25.70% Dec 29, 2014 - Apr 13, 2016 | -25.34% Aug 17, 2015 - Apr 27, 2016 |
| #9 | -24.87% Dec 31, 2021 - Nov 10, 2022 | -19.70% May 18, 2005 - Feb 9, 2006 |
| #10 | -23.78% Dec 2, 2022 - Jul 26, 2023 | -19.47% Nov 25, 2016 - Nov 29, 2017 |
| #11 | -22.74% Sep 13, 2018 - Jul 24, 2019 | -17.69% Jan 8, 2018 - Jul 25, 2018 |
| #12 | -20.39% Jan 20, 2004 - Sep 28, 2004 | -15.01% May 4, 2022 - Jul 28, 2022 |
| #13 | -20.36% May 10, 2021 - Dec 8, 2021 | -14.86% Jun 10, 2014 - Oct 30, 2014 |
| #14 | -16.36% Sep 7, 2016 - Mar 14, 2017 | -14.45% Jul 16, 2024 - Sep 23, 2024 |
| #15 | -15.37% Feb 13, 2002 - Apr 30, 2002 | -13.99% Jul 16, 2004 - Feb 3, 2005 |
Correlation
Correlation between RPM and CSL is 0.96 which considered as a very strong positive correlation - the stocks move almost identically together.
Dividend Comparison (1999 - 2026)
RPM vs CSL dividend yield comparison.
| Year | RPM | CSL |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 0.99% | 0.62% |
| 2025 | 1.99% | 1.31% |
| 2024 | 1.54% | 1.00% |
| 2023 | 1.54% | 1.02% |
| 2022 | 1.66% | 1.09% |
| 2021 | 1.52% | 0.86% |
| 2020 | 1.61% | 1.31% |
| 2019 | 1.84% | 1.11% |
| 2018 | 2.23% | 1.53% |
| 2017 | 2.33% | 1.27% |
| 2016 | 2.09% | 1.18% |
| 2015 | 2.39% | 1.24% |
| 2014 | 1.93% | 1.04% |
| 2013 | 1.66% | 1.06% |
| 2012 | 3.73% | 1.29% |
| 2011 | 3.44% | 1.58% |
| 2010 | 3.73% | 1.66% |
| 2009 | 3.96% | 1.84% |
| 2008 | 5.79% | 2.90% |
| 2007 | 3.52% | 1.51% |
| 2006 | 3.14% | 1.32% |
| 2005 | 3.51% | 1.39% |
| 2004 | 2.90% | 1.39% |
| 2003 | 3.22% | 1.43% |
| 2002 | 3.30% | 2.05% |
| 2001 | 3.46% | 2.22% |
| 2000 | 5.75% | 1.77% |
| 1999 | 0.00% | 0.50% |
Select Stocks to Compare
More Comparisons
Compare with similar stocks