RMBS vs FNF

Comparison between Rambus Inc (RMBS, Company) and Fidelity National Financial Inc (FNF, Company).

RMBS is from the Technology sector, while FNF is from the Financial Services sector.

5-Year PerformanceRMBS has outperformed FNF, delivering a return of +46.2% compared to +7.5%

RMBS vs FNF - Performance Comparison

Log

Key Characteristics

Financial metrics and valuation ratios

Metric	RMBS(COMPANY)	FNF(COMPANY)
Market Cap	$14B	$14B
Max Drawdown	97.16%	75.24%
Sharpe Ratio	1.62	-0.63
5Y Beta	2.50	0.57
Industry	Semiconductors	Insurance - Specialty
P/E Ratio	60.95	23.16
Forward P/E	24.15	8.30
PEG Ratio	5.94	0.85
Dividend Yield	N/A	3.02%
5Y Dividends CAGR	N/A	14.21%
5Y EPS CAGR	N/A	-14.03%
Debt to Equity	0.00%	59.27%
Free Cash Flow Yield	2.38%	41.95%
P/S Ratio	18.98	0.95
P/B Ratio	10.09	1.90

Market Cap

Winner

RMBS

$14B

FNF

$14B

Max Drawdown

RMBS

97.16%

Winner

FNF

75.24%

Sharpe Ratio

Winner

RMBS

1.62

FNF

-0.63

5Y Beta

RMBS

2.50

Winner

FNF

0.57

Industry

RMBS

Semiconductors

FNF

Insurance - Specialty

P/E Ratio

RMBS

60.95

Winner

FNF

23.16

Forward P/E

RMBS

24.15

Winner

FNF

8.30

PEG Ratio

RMBS

5.94

Winner

FNF

0.85

Dividend Yield

RMBS

N/A

FNF

3.02%

5Y Dividends CAGR

RMBS

N/A

FNF

14.21%

5Y EPS CAGR

RMBS

N/A

FNF

-14.03%

Debt to Equity

Winner

RMBS

0.00%

FNF

59.27%

Free Cash Flow Yield

RMBS

2.38%

Winner

FNF

41.95%

P/S Ratio

RMBS

18.98

Winner

FNF

0.95

P/B Ratio

RMBS

10.09

Winner

FNF

1.90

RMBS vs FNF - Historical Returns

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

Period	RMBS	FNF
1 month	+27.42%	+6.22%
3 months	+16.52%	-9.19%
6 months	+20.04%	-6.25%
1 year	+150.47%	-8.88%
5 years(CAGR)	+46.16%	+7.52%
10 years(CAGR)	+27.51%	+12.35%
Max(CAGR)	+8.05%	+9.40%

Winner

RMBS

+27.42%

FNF

+6.22%

Winner

RMBS

+16.52%

FNF

-9.19%

Winner

RMBS

+20.04%

FNF

-6.25%

Winner

RMBS

+150.47%

FNF

-8.88%

5Y(CAGR)

Winner

RMBS

+46.16%

FNF

+7.52%

10Y(CAGR)

Winner

RMBS

+27.51%

FNF

+12.35%

Max(CAGR)

RMBS

+8.05%

Winner

FNF

+9.40%

RMBS vs FNF - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

Year	RMBS	FNF
2026	+30.18%	-5.86%
2025	+71.76%	+4.68%
2024	-18.99%	+17.40%
2023	+94.89%	+41.41%
2022	+22.17%	-20.50%
2021	+67.94%	+40.49%
2020	+25.34%	-9.42%
2019	+71.97%	+49.08%
2018	-46.33%	-15.59%
2017	+0.42%	+64.84%
2016	+18.81%	+4.02%
2015	+1.13%	+0.70%
2014	+16.00%	+9.36%
2013	+80.73%	+35.03%
2012	-39.95%	+51.53%
2011	-63.17%	+20.02%
2010	-11.84%	+5.52%
2009	+39.51%	-21.01%
2008	-22.08%	+32.94%
2007	+9.29%	-34.55%
2006	+4.01%	+3.72%
2005	-29.24%	-5.30%
2004	-24.71%	N/A
2003	+332.39%	N/A
2002	-19.54%	N/A
2001	-76.42%	N/A
2000	+109.45%	N/A
1999	+1.60%	N/A

RMBS vs FNF Drawdown Comparison

The maximum drawdown for RMBS was -97.16%, occurring on Jun 26, 2002. Recovery took 6430 trading sessions.

The maximum drawdown for FNF was -72.48%, occurring on Nov 20, 2008. Recovery took 1348 trading sessions.

The current RMBS drawdown is -18.41%. The current FNF drawdown is -18.25%.

Rank	RMBS	FNF
#1	-97.16% Jun 26, 2000 - Jan 21, 2026	-72.48% Jun 1, 2007 - Oct 4, 2012
#2	-66.16% Mar 13, 2000 - Jun 23, 2000	-56.13% Jan 30, 2020 - May 14, 2021
#3	-36.69% Jan 21, 2026 - Apr 17, 2026	-36.69% Jan 14, 2022 - Dec 19, 2023
#4	-29.75% Apr 24, 2026 - Apr 28, 2026	-30.06% Apr 2, 2025 - Mar 20, 2026
#5	-28.41% Nov 8, 1999 - Feb 14, 2000	-27.90% Oct 14, 2005 - Feb 6, 2007
#6	-14.36% Feb 29, 2000 - Mar 6, 2000	-26.95% Jan 17, 2018 - Apr 26, 2019
#7	-11.61% Feb 15, 2000 - Feb 22, 2000	-25.13% Aug 4, 2015 - Mar 17, 2017
#8	-2.39% Feb 24, 2000 - Feb 28, 2000	-23.01% May 14, 2014 - Dec 23, 2014
#9	-1.17% Mar 7, 2000 - Mar 9, 2000	-16.35% Apr 30, 2013 - Sep 25, 2013
#10	-0.90% Feb 22, 2000 - Feb 24, 2000	-14.28% Nov 25, 2024 - Feb 28, 2025
#11	-0.05% Apr 17, 2026 - Apr 21, 2026	-11.45% Mar 28, 2024 - Jul 15, 2024
#12	N/A	-10.98% Jun 8, 2021 - Aug 10, 2021
#13	N/A	-9.59% Dec 24, 2013 - Feb 18, 2014
#14	N/A	-9.28% Feb 14, 2013 - Apr 5, 2013
#15	N/A	-7.98% Aug 13, 2021 - Oct 14, 2021