RMBS vs FLS

Comparison between Rambus Inc (RMBS, Company) and Flowserve Corp (FLS, Company).

RMBS is from the Technology sector, while FLS is from the Industrials sector.

5-Year PerformanceRMBS has outperformed FLS, delivering a return of +30.5% compared to +14.6%

RMBS vs FLS - Performance Comparison

Log

Key Characteristics

Financial metrics and valuation ratios

Metric	RMBS(COMPANY)	FLS(COMPANY)
Market Cap	$8.95B	$8.93B
Max Drawdown	97.16%	77.36%
Sharpe Ratio	0.61	0.77
5Y Beta	2.54	1.56
Industry	Semiconductors	Specialty Industrial Machinery
P/E Ratio	38.81	18.77
Forward P/E	24.15	18.12
PEG Ratio	3.78	0.25
Dividend Yield	N/A	1.16%
5Y Dividends CAGR	N/A	5.99%
5Y EPS CAGR	N/A	18.15%
Debt to Equity	0.00%	94.49%
Free Cash Flow Yield	3.74%	5.46%
P/S Ratio	11.88	1.92
P/B Ratio	6.47	4.24

Market Cap

Winner

RMBS

$8.95B

FLS

$8.93B

Max Drawdown

RMBS

97.16%

Winner

FLS

77.36%

Sharpe Ratio

RMBS

0.61

Winner

FLS

0.77

5Y Beta

RMBS

2.54

Winner

FLS

1.56

Industry

RMBS

Semiconductors

FLS

Specialty Industrial Machinery

P/E Ratio

RMBS

38.81

Winner

FLS

18.77

Forward P/E

RMBS

24.15

Winner

FLS

18.12

PEG Ratio

RMBS

3.78

Winner

FLS

0.25

Dividend Yield

RMBS

N/A

FLS

1.16%

5Y Dividends CAGR

RMBS

N/A

FLS

5.99%

5Y EPS CAGR

RMBS

N/A

FLS

18.15%

Debt to Equity

Winner

RMBS

0.00%

FLS

94.49%

Free Cash Flow Yield

RMBS

3.74%

Winner

FLS

5.46%

P/S Ratio

RMBS

11.88

Winner

FLS

1.92

P/B Ratio

RMBS

6.47

Winner

FLS

4.24

RMBS vs FLS - Historical Returns

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

Period	RMBS	FLS
1 month	-32.51%	+1.54%
3 months	-22.18%	+2.56%
6 months	-21.30%	-3.06%
1 year	+19.30%	+36.21%
5 years(CAGR)	+30.51%	+14.59%
10 years(CAGR)	+20.81%	+6.71%
Max(CAGR)	+6.51%	+11.51%

RMBS

-32.51%

Winner

FLS

+1.54%

RMBS

-22.18%

Winner

FLS

+2.56%

RMBS

-21.30%

Winner

FLS

-3.06%

RMBS

+19.30%

Winner

FLS

+36.21%

5Y(CAGR)

Winner

RMBS

+30.51%

FLS

+14.59%

10Y(CAGR)

Winner

RMBS

+20.81%

FLS

+6.71%

Max(CAGR)

RMBS

+6.51%

Winner

FLS

+11.51%

RMBS vs FLS - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

Year	RMBS	FLS
2026	-9.77%	+7.08%
2025	+71.76%	+22.83%
2024	-18.99%	+44.37%
2023	+94.89%	+35.29%
2022	+22.17%	+1.67%
2021	+67.94%	-10.02%
2020	+25.34%	-25.24%
2019	+71.97%	+33.08%
2018	-46.33%	-9.01%
2017	+0.42%	-12.92%
2016	+18.81%	+16.21%
2015	+1.13%	-28.37%
2014	+16.00%	-19.84%
2013	+80.73%	+58.24%
2012	-39.95%	+45.71%
2011	-63.17%	-16.36%
2010	-11.84%	+24.27%
2009	+39.51%	+74.34%
2008	-22.08%	-44.96%
2007	+9.29%	+89.63%
2006	+4.01%	+23.37%
2005	-29.24%	+47.28%
2004	-24.71%	+32.28%
2003	+332.39%	+36.92%
2002	-19.54%	-44.00%
2001	-76.42%	+28.99%
2000	+109.45%	+30.05%
1999	+1.60%	-1.38%

RMBS vs FLS Drawdown Comparison

The maximum drawdown for RMBS was -97.16%, occurring on Jun 26, 2002. Recovery took 6430 trading sessions.

The maximum drawdown for FLS was -77.36%, occurring on Oct 10, 2002. Recovery took 819 trading sessions.

The current RMBS drawdown is -47.51%. The current FLS drawdown is -17.69%.

Rank	RMBS	FLS
#1	-97.16% Jun 26, 2000 - Jan 21, 2026	-77.36% May 2, 2002 - Aug 2, 2005
#2	-66.16% Mar 13, 2000 - Jun 23, 2000	-73.54% Apr 2, 2014 - Oct 29, 2025
#3	-51.48% Jun 3, 2026 - Jul 29, 2026	-73.10% Jul 21, 2008 - Sep 14, 2012
#4	-36.69% Jan 21, 2026 - Apr 17, 2026	-41.25% May 22, 2001 - Apr 25, 2002
#5	-29.75% Apr 24, 2026 - Jun 2, 2026	-40.31% Nov 18, 1999 - Aug 22, 2000
#6	-28.41% Nov 8, 1999 - Feb 14, 2000	-29.83% Feb 25, 2026 - May 19, 2026
#7	-14.36% Feb 29, 2000 - Mar 6, 2000	-21.25% May 10, 2006 - Apr 24, 2007
#8	-11.61% Feb 15, 2000 - Feb 22, 2000	-20.62% Dec 13, 2007 - Feb 20, 2008
#9	-2.39% Feb 24, 2000 - Feb 28, 2000	-17.19% Aug 8, 2007 - Sep 19, 2007
#10	-1.17% Mar 7, 2000 - Mar 9, 2000	-17.08% Jun 16, 2008 - Jul 14, 2008
#11	-0.90% Feb 22, 2000 - Feb 24, 2000	-16.74% Mar 7, 2001 - Apr 17, 2001
#12	-0.05% Apr 17, 2026 - Apr 21, 2026	-15.47% Feb 28, 2008 - Apr 7, 2008
#13	N/A	-15.35% Dec 12, 2000 - Dec 27, 2000
#14	N/A	-13.80% Sep 6, 2000 - Oct 30, 2000
#15	N/A	-11.57% Dec 31, 2013 - Feb 19, 2014