RMBS vs COO

Comparison between Rambus Inc (RMBS, Company) and Cooper Companies Inc (COO, Company).

RMBS is from the Technology sector, while COO is from the Healthcare sector.

5-Year PerformanceRMBS has outperformed COO, delivering a return of +39.9% compared to -6.5%

RMBS vs COO - Performance Comparison

Log

Key Characteristics

Financial metrics and valuation ratios

Metric	RMBS(COMPANY)	COO(COMPANY)
Market Cap	$13B	$13B
Max Drawdown	97.16%	86.96%
Sharpe Ratio	1.23	0.02
5Y Beta	2.56	0.66
Industry	Semiconductors	Medical Instruments & Supplies
P/E Ratio	58.36	57.50
Forward P/E	24.15	14.75
PEG Ratio	5.69	0.69
5Y Dividends CAGR	N/A	8.45%
5Y EPS CAGR	N/A	-36.92%
Debt to Equity	0.00%	29.84%
Free Cash Flow Yield	2.49%	4.25%
P/S Ratio	18.67	3.17
P/B Ratio	9.66	1.63

Market Cap

Winner

RMBS

$13B

COO

$13B

Max Drawdown

RMBS

97.16%

Winner

COO

86.96%

Sharpe Ratio

Winner

RMBS

1.23

COO

0.02

5Y Beta

RMBS

2.56

Winner

COO

0.66

Industry

RMBS

Semiconductors

COO

Medical Instruments & Supplies

P/E Ratio

RMBS

58.36

Winner

COO

57.50

Forward P/E

RMBS

24.15

Winner

COO

14.75

PEG Ratio

RMBS

5.69

Winner

COO

0.69

5Y Dividends CAGR

RMBS

N/A

COO

8.45%

5Y EPS CAGR

RMBS

N/A

COO

-36.92%

Debt to Equity

Winner

RMBS

0.00%

COO

29.84%

Free Cash Flow Yield

RMBS

2.49%

Winner

COO

4.25%

P/S Ratio

RMBS

18.67

Winner

COO

3.17

P/B Ratio

RMBS

9.66

Winner

COO

1.63

RMBS vs COO - Historical Returns

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

Period	RMBS	COO
1 month	-21.33%	+13.88%
3 months	+28.94%	-1.13%
6 months	+30.92%	-14.45%
1 year	+99.82%	+1.58%
5 years(CAGR)	+39.94%	-6.54%
10 years(CAGR)	+26.51%	+5.43%
Max(CAGR)	+7.83%	+12.27%

RMBS

-21.33%

Winner

COO

+13.88%

Winner

RMBS

+28.94%

COO

-1.13%

Winner

RMBS

+30.92%

COO

-14.45%

Winner

RMBS

+99.82%

COO

+1.58%

5Y(CAGR)

Winner

RMBS

+39.94%

COO

-6.54%

10Y(CAGR)

Winner

RMBS

+26.51%

COO

+5.43%

Max(CAGR)

RMBS

+7.83%

Winner

COO

+12.27%

RMBS vs COO - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

Year	RMBS	COO
2026	+24.59%	-12.91%
2025	+71.76%	-9.60%
2024	-18.99%	-1.44%
2023	+94.89%	+13.77%
2022	+22.17%	-21.55%
2021	+67.94%	+17.28%
2020	+25.34%	+12.39%
2019	+71.97%	+28.22%
2018	-46.33%	+15.38%
2017	+0.42%	+24.43%
2016	+18.81%	+32.72%
2015	+1.13%	-16.41%
2014	+16.00%	+31.78%
2013	+80.73%	+30.21%
2012	-39.95%	+30.79%
2011	-63.17%	+24.16%
2010	-11.84%	+49.48%
2009	+39.51%	+104.73%
2008	-22.08%	-56.81%
2007	+9.29%	-13.11%
2006	+4.01%	-13.14%
2005	-29.24%	-27.13%
2004	-24.71%	+49.60%
2003	+332.39%	+83.81%
2002	-19.54%	+2.76%
2001	-76.42%	+25.41%
2000	+109.45%	+35.53%
1999	+1.60%	+13.74%

RMBS vs COO Drawdown Comparison

The maximum drawdown for RMBS was -97.16%, occurring on Jun 26, 2002. Recovery took 6430 trading sessions.

The maximum drawdown for COO was -86.90%, occurring on Nov 20, 2008. Recovery took 1785 trading sessions.

The current RMBS drawdown is -27.52%. The current COO drawdown is -38.00%.

Rank	RMBS	COO
#1	-97.16% Jun 26, 2000 - Jan 21, 2026	-86.90% Mar 7, 2005 - Apr 5, 2012
#2	-66.16% Mar 13, 2000 - Jun 23, 2000	-48.24% Sep 3, 2021 - May 11, 2026
#3	-36.69% Jan 21, 2026 - Apr 17, 2026	-35.99% Mar 30, 2015 - Sep 15, 2016
#4	-29.75% Apr 24, 2026 - Jun 2, 2026	-32.37% Jan 22, 2020 - Oct 12, 2020
#5	-28.41% Nov 8, 1999 - Feb 14, 2000	-28.92% Aug 23, 2001 - Oct 3, 2002
#6	-27.52% Jun 3, 2026 - Jun 25, 2026	-28.17% Jul 6, 2000 - Dec 27, 2000
#7	-14.36% Feb 29, 2000 - Mar 6, 2000	-22.50% Dec 9, 2002 - May 12, 2003
#8	-11.61% Feb 15, 2000 - Feb 22, 2000	-21.99% Jan 20, 2000 - Mar 23, 2000
#9	-2.39% Feb 24, 2000 - Feb 28, 2000	-18.34% Apr 27, 2012 - Sep 7, 2012
#10	-1.17% Mar 7, 2000 - Mar 9, 2000	-17.66% Jul 29, 2019 - Jan 15, 2020
#11	-0.90% Feb 22, 2000 - Feb 24, 2000	-17.38% Dec 3, 2018 - Feb 19, 2019
#12	-0.05% Apr 17, 2026 - Apr 21, 2026	-16.15% Apr 9, 2001 - Jun 27, 2001
#13	N/A	-16.01% Sep 15, 2016 - Feb 9, 2017
#14	N/A	-14.52% Jul 19, 2017 - Jul 25, 2018
#15	N/A	-13.07% Sep 10, 2013 - Mar 7, 2014