RMBS vs CLH

Comparison between Rambus Inc (RMBS, Company) and Clean Harbors Inc (CLH, Company).

RMBS is from the Technology sector, while CLH is from the Industrials sector.

5-Year PerformanceRMBS has outperformed CLH, delivering a return of +44.7% compared to +26.8%

RMBS vs CLH - Performance Comparison

Log

Key Characteristics

Financial metrics and valuation ratios

Metric	RMBS(COMPANY)	CLH(COMPANY)
Market Cap	$15B	$15B
Max Drawdown	97.16%	80.87%
Sharpe Ratio	1.46	0.91
5Y Beta	2.55	0.80
Industry	Semiconductors	Waste Management
P/E Ratio	66.16	38.87
Forward P/E	24.15	33.67
PEG Ratio	6.45	17.48
5Y Dividends CAGR	N/A	125.50%
5Y EPS CAGR	N/A	23.04%
Debt to Equity	0.00%	99.95%
Free Cash Flow Yield	2.20%	3.06%

Market Cap

Winner

RMBS

$15B

CLH

$15B

Max Drawdown

RMBS

97.16%

Winner

CLH

80.87%

Sharpe Ratio

Winner

RMBS

1.46

CLH

0.91

5Y Beta

RMBS

2.55

Winner

CLH

0.80

Industry

RMBS

Semiconductors

CLH

Waste Management

P/E Ratio

RMBS

66.16

Winner

CLH

38.87

Forward P/E

Winner

RMBS

24.15

CLH

33.67

PEG Ratio

Winner

RMBS

6.45

CLH

17.48

5Y Dividends CAGR

RMBS

N/A

CLH

125.50%

5Y EPS CAGR

RMBS

N/A

CLH

23.04%

Debt to Equity

Winner

RMBS

0.00%

CLH

99.95%

Free Cash Flow Yield

RMBS

2.20%

Winner

CLH

3.06%

RMBS vs CLH - Historical Returns

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

Period	RMBS	CLH
1 month	+14.07%	-4.35%
3 months	+51.28%	-0.82%
6 months	+54.30%	+20.89%
1 year	+133.15%	+27.51%
5 years(CAGR)	+44.69%	+26.81%
10 years(CAGR)	+28.05%	+18.84%
Max(CAGR)	+8.37%	+33.21%

Winner

RMBS

+14.07%

CLH

-4.35%

Winner

RMBS

+51.28%

CLH

-0.82%

Winner

RMBS

+54.30%

CLH

+20.89%

Winner

RMBS

+133.15%

CLH

+27.51%

5Y(CAGR)

Winner

RMBS

+44.69%

CLH

+26.81%

10Y(CAGR)

Winner

RMBS

+28.05%

CLH

+18.84%

Max(CAGR)

RMBS

+8.37%

Winner

CLH

+33.21%

RMBS vs CLH - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

Year	RMBS	CLH
2026	+42.19%	+18.55%
2025	+71.76%	+2.17%
2024	-18.99%	+34.87%
2023	+94.89%	+53.43%
2022	+22.17%	+17.17%
2021	+67.94%	+33.54%
2020	+25.34%	-10.49%
2019	+71.97%	+72.54%
2018	-46.33%	-7.51%
2017	+0.42%	-2.78%
2016	+18.81%	+32.06%
2015	+1.13%	-14.07%
2014	+16.00%	-18.57%
2013	+80.73%	+10.14%
2012	-39.95%	-12.21%
2011	-63.17%	+202.04%
2010	-11.84%	+38.59%
2009	+39.51%	-6.38%
2008	-22.08%	+26.05%
2007	+9.29%	+9.89%
2006	+4.01%	+67.31%
2005	-29.24%	+115.12%
2004	-24.71%	+107.82%
2003	+332.39%	-33.48%
2002	-19.54%	+519.75%
2001	-76.42%	+129.79%
2000	+109.45%	+46.10%
1999	+1.60%	-16.67%

RMBS vs CLH Drawdown Comparison

The maximum drawdown for RMBS was -97.16%, occurring on Jun 26, 2002. Recovery took 6430 trading sessions.

The maximum drawdown for CLH was -77.69%, occurring on Oct 23, 2003. Recovery took 435 trading sessions.

The current RMBS drawdown is -17.28%. The current CLH drawdown is -8.00%.

Rank	RMBS	CLH
#1	-97.16% Jun 26, 2000 - Jan 21, 2026	-77.69% Dec 18, 2002 - Sep 13, 2004
#2	-66.16% Mar 13, 2000 - Jun 23, 2000	-64.51% Feb 20, 2020 - Feb 24, 2021
#3	-36.69% Jan 21, 2026 - Apr 17, 2026	-56.67% Mar 17, 2000 - Oct 22, 2001
#4	-29.75% Apr 24, 2026 - Jun 2, 2026	-54.43% May 20, 2002 - Nov 21, 2002
#5	-28.41% Nov 8, 1999 - Feb 14, 2000	-50.39% Aug 28, 2008 - Dec 20, 2010
#6	-23.77% Jun 3, 2026 - Jun 17, 2026	-44.03% Feb 23, 2012 - Sep 7, 2018
#7	-14.36% Feb 29, 2000 - Mar 6, 2000	-36.30% Oct 22, 2001 - Jan 29, 2002
#8	-11.61% Feb 15, 2000 - Feb 22, 2000	-34.99% Sep 7, 2018 - Mar 26, 2019
#9	-2.39% Feb 24, 2000 - Feb 28, 2000	-30.86% Oct 29, 2024 - Jan 15, 2026
#10	-1.17% Mar 7, 2000 - Mar 9, 2000	-30.19% Nov 7, 2005 - May 4, 2006
#11	-0.90% Feb 22, 2000 - Feb 24, 2000	-29.27% Nov 2, 2021 - Aug 12, 2022
#12	-0.05% Apr 17, 2026 - Apr 21, 2026	-28.02% Nov 5, 1999 - Jan 11, 2000
#13	N/A	-21.97% Jan 19, 2000 - Mar 3, 2000
#14	N/A	-21.04% Apr 10, 2002 - May 13, 2002
#15	N/A	-20.69% Jan 31, 2002 - Feb 25, 2002