StockComparison Logo
vs

RJF vs NTAP

Comparison between Raymond James Financial Inc (RJF, Company) and Netapp Inc (NTAP, Company).

RJF is from the Financial Services sector, while NTAP is from the Technology sector.

5-Year PerformanceNTAP has outperformed RJF, delivering a return of +18.4% compared to +13.0%

RJF vs NTAP - Performance Comparison

Key Characteristics

Financial metrics and valuation ratios

Market Cap
Winner
RJF
$28B
NTAP
$28B
Max Drawdown
Winner
RJF
69.99%
NTAP
96.21%
Sharpe Ratio
RJF
0.20
Winner
NTAP
1.33
5Y Beta
Winner
RJF
0.96
NTAP
1.26
Industry
RJF
Asset Management
NTAP
Software - Infrastructure
P/E Ratio
Winner
RJF
13.36
NTAP
23.46
Forward P/E
Winner
RJF
11.44
NTAP
19.34
PEG Ratio
RJF
9.11
Winner
NTAP
2.53
Dividend Yield
Winner
RJF
1.38%
NTAP
1.16%
5Y Dividends CAGR
Winner
RJF
20.55%
NTAP
6.25%
5Y EPS CAGR
RJF
16.38%
Winner
NTAP
17.86%
Debt to Equity
Winner
RJF
0.00%
NTAP
214.68%
Free Cash Flow Yield
Winner
RJF
8.42%
NTAP
5.69%
P/S Ratio
Winner
RJF
1.90
NTAP
4.21
P/B Ratio
Winner
RJF
2.22
NTAP
24.32

RJF vs NTAP - Historical Returns

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

1M
RJF
-4.67%
Winner
NTAP
+46.35%
3M
RJF
-2.74%
Winner
NTAP
+64.41%
6M
RJF
-6.50%
Winner
NTAP
+43.86%
1Y
RJF
+7.02%
Winner
NTAP
+62.77%
5Y(CAGR)
RJF
+12.99%
Winner
NTAP
+18.37%
10Y(CAGR)
RJF
+16.70%
Winner
NTAP
+23.99%
Max(CAGR)
Winner
RJF
+14.57%
NTAP
+9.89%

RJF vs NTAP - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

YearRJFNTAP
2026-7.08%+57.68%
2025+4.63%-5.71%
2024+39.82%+37.20%
2023+6.85%+49.33%
2022+5.37%-33.23%
2021+61.61%+45.48%
2020+7.12%+9.14%
2019+22.83%+6.25%
2018-15.47%+9.17%
2017+29.22%+58.58%
2016+24.81%+39.25%
2015+2.79%-34.70%
2014+12.50%+4.23%
2013+32.21%+20.85%
2012+22.00%-8.77%
2011-4.67%-36.82%
2010+37.00%+60.75%
2009+34.87%+132.63%
2008-45.35%-43.26%
2007+7.34%-37.52%
2006+19.45%+40.74%
2005+24.72%-17.43%
2004+26.57%+60.25%
2003+26.41%+91.03%
2002-13.96%-57.95%
2001+1.54%-57.48%
2000+100.41%+51.04%
1999-6.74%+124.49%

RJF vs NTAP Drawdown Comparison

The maximum drawdown for RJF was -69.67%, occurring on Mar 6, 2009. Recovery took 590 trading sessions.

The maximum drawdown for NTAP was -96.21%, occurring on Oct 8, 2002. Recovery took 5932 trading sessions.

The current RJF drawdown is -13.29%. The current NTAP drawdown is -7.75%.

RankRJFNTAP
#1-69.67%
Sep 19, 2008 - Jan 24, 2011
-96.21%
Oct 20, 2000 - May 22, 2024
#2-45.59%
Feb 19, 2020 - Jan 6, 2021
-58.09%
Mar 9, 2000 - Sep 18, 2000
#3-44.37%
Oct 31, 2007 - Sep 19, 2008
-42.59%
Jul 10, 2024 - May 22, 2026
#4-40.65%
Jan 4, 2001 - Oct 6, 2003
-22.80%
Sep 22, 2000 - Oct 20, 2000
#5-38.15%
Feb 18, 2011 - Sep 14, 2012
-17.94%
Dec 22, 1999 - Jan 10, 2000
#6-33.45%
Jul 16, 2015 - Oct 27, 2016
-16.01%
Jan 18, 2000 - Feb 4, 2000
#7-32.11%
Nov 10, 2022 - Mar 5, 2024
-11.77%
Dec 14, 1999 - Dec 22, 1999
#8-31.02%
May 22, 2018 - Feb 18, 2020
-11.64%
Nov 29, 1999 - Dec 2, 1999
#9-28.12%
Jan 24, 2025 - Sep 18, 2025
-9.67%
Nov 9, 1999 - Nov 16, 1999
#10-25.75%
Feb 9, 2022 - Oct 28, 2022
-8.00%
Feb 24, 2000 - Mar 6, 2000
#11-22.11%
Mar 24, 2000 - Jun 16, 2000
-7.75%
Jun 3, 2026 - Jun 5, 2026
#12-21.27%
Nov 16, 1999 - Mar 24, 2000
-6.92%
Jan 10, 2000 - Jan 14, 2000
#13-19.64%
Sep 29, 2025 - Mar 30, 2026
-6.61%
Nov 17, 1999 - Nov 26, 1999
#14-19.45%
Nov 3, 2003 - Nov 3, 2004
-4.62%
Feb 16, 2000 - Feb 23, 2000
#15-19.02%
Mar 18, 2005 - Oct 4, 2005
-4.26%
Feb 11, 2000 - Feb 16, 2000

Correlation

Correlation between RJF and NTAP is 0.89 which considered as a strong positive correlation - the stocks tend to move together.

0.89
-101

Dividend Comparison (1999 - 2026)

RJF vs NTAP dividend yield comparison.

YearRJFNTAP
20260.71%0.62%
20251.25%1.94%
20240.87%1.76%
20231.53%2.27%
20221.67%3.33%
20211.04%2.13%
20201.16%2.90%
20191.93%2.83%
20181.48%2.01%
20170.74%1.41%
20161.18%2.10%
20151.28%2.60%
20141.15%1.52%
20131.11%0.73%
20121.38%0.00%
20111.68%0.00%
20101.41%0.00%
20091.85%0.00%
20083.21%0.00%
20070.92%0.00%
20061.12%0.00%
20050.96%0.00%
20040.94%0.00%
20030.96%0.00%
20021.22%0.00%
20011.27%0.00%
20000.90%0.00%
19990.40%0.00%

Select Stocks to Compare