RGR vs CLB
Comparison between Sturm Ruger & Co. Inc (RGR, Company) and Core Laboratories Inc (CLB, Company).
RGR is from the Industrials sector, while CLB is from the Energy sector.
5-Year PerformanceRGR has outperformed CLB, delivering a return of -9.3% compared to -22.6%
RGR vs CLB - Performance Comparison
Key Characteristics
Financial metrics and valuation ratios
RGR vs CLB - Historical Returns
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
RGR vs CLB - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
| Year | RGR | CLB |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | +18.49% | -22.32% |
| 2025 | -4.76% | -11.95% |
| 2024 | -20.21% | -0.80% |
| 2023 | -10.53% | -7.33% |
| 2022 | -16.59% | -16.88% |
| 2021 | +6.13% | -19.29% |
| 2020 | +49.71% | -30.42% |
| 2019 | -11.43% | -34.57% |
| 2018 | -4.81% | -45.70% |
| 2017 | +7.12% | -8.10% |
| 2016 | -11.80% | +14.09% |
| 2015 | +74.22% | -7.01% |
| 2014 | -51.68% | -35.33% |
| 2013 | +65.20% | +71.69% |
| 2012 | +48.44% | -4.52% |
| 2011 | +125.49% | +28.72% |
| 2010 | +52.64% | +47.40% |
| 2009 | +58.94% | +85.09% |
| 2008 | -28.76% | -51.75% |
| 2007 | -13.75% | +60.64% |
| 2006 | +36.75% | +109.84% |
| 2005 | -17.66% | +63.64% |
| 2004 | -18.33% | +38.66% |
| 2003 | +24.84% | +44.75% |
| 2002 | -13.76% | -21.72% |
| 2001 | +37.95% | -45.55% |
| 2000 | +15.29% | +41.87% |
| 1999 | +0.86% | +9.59% |
RGR vs CLB Drawdown Comparison
The maximum drawdown for RGR was -79.69%, occurring on Nov 20, 2008. Recovery took 912 trading sessions.
The maximum drawdown for CLB was -95.78%, occurring on Mar 17, 2020. This drawdown has not yet recovered.
The current RGR drawdown is -45.83%. The current CLB drawdown is -92.96%.
| Rank | RGR | CLB |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | -79.69% Aug 7, 2007 - Mar 21, 2011 | -95.78% Apr 21, 2014 - Mar 17, 2020 |
| #2 | -60.65% Jun 30, 2021 - Nov 20, 2025 | -74.19% Apr 3, 2000 - Jul 29, 2005 |
| #3 | -58.67% Jan 16, 2014 - Jun 30, 2020 | -65.25% Nov 6, 2007 - Apr 22, 2010 |
| #4 | -57.09% Apr 7, 2004 - Mar 20, 2007 | -31.21% May 2, 2012 - Apr 22, 2013 |
| #5 | -39.73% May 28, 2002 - Feb 10, 2004 | -29.26% May 5, 2006 - Jul 27, 2006 |
| #6 | -38.89% May 2, 2012 - Nov 27, 2012 | -27.02% Sep 5, 2006 - Nov 14, 2006 |
| #7 | -30.68% Aug 30, 2011 - Jan 5, 2012 | -26.37% Jul 15, 2011 - Dec 1, 2011 |
| #8 | -28.36% May 24, 2000 - Jan 4, 2001 | -20.07% Dec 8, 2006 - Apr 25, 2007 |
| #9 | -28.07% Aug 10, 2020 - Jun 21, 2021 | -18.95% Nov 19, 1999 - Mar 1, 2000 |
| #10 | -26.29% Nov 29, 2012 - Feb 8, 2013 | -15.49% Sep 7, 2005 - Nov 1, 2005 |
| #11 | -20.72% Apr 29, 2011 - Jul 22, 2011 | -15.11% Apr 26, 2010 - Jun 18, 2010 |
| #12 | -19.15% Mar 4, 2013 - Sep 10, 2013 | -14.26% Mar 7, 2000 - Mar 31, 2000 |
| #13 | -15.98% Jan 19, 2000 - May 24, 2000 | -13.63% Oct 18, 2010 - Dec 7, 2010 |
| #14 | -15.73% Oct 15, 2001 - Mar 4, 2002 | -13.09% Apr 4, 2011 - Jun 20, 2011 |
| #15 | -15.51% Jan 16, 2001 - Sep 24, 2001 | -11.32% Aug 10, 2007 - Sep 5, 2007 |
Correlation
Correlation between RGR and CLB is 0.31 which considered as a weak positive correlation - the stocks show a slight tendency to move together.
Dividend Comparison (1999 - 2026)
RGR vs CLB dividend yield comparison.
| Year | RGR | CLB |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 0.48% | 0.15% |
| 2025 | 1.90% | 0.25% |
| 2024 | 1.95% | 0.23% |
| 2023 | 2.79% | 0.23% |
| 2022 | 14.66% | 0.20% |
| 2021 | 4.94% | 0.18% |
| 2020 | 10.00% | 1.06% |
| 2019 | 1.74% | 5.84% |
| 2018 | 2.07% | 3.69% |
| 2017 | 2.44% | 2.01% |
| 2016 | 3.28% | 1.83% |
| 2015 | 1.85% | 2.02% |
| 2014 | 4.68% | 1.66% |
| 2013 | 2.91% | 0.67% |
| 2012 | 12.76% | 1.02% |
| 2011 | 1.29% | 0.88% |
| 2010 | 2.16% | 1.00% |
| 2009 | 3.14% | 0.97% |
| 2008 | 0.00% | 2.67% |
| 2005 | 4.28% | 0.00% |
| 2004 | 6.64% | 0.00% |
| 2003 | 7.04% | 0.00% |
| 2002 | 8.36% | 0.00% |
| 2001 | 6.68% | 0.00% |
| 2000 | 8.47% | 0.00% |
| 1999 | 2.25% | 0.00% |
Select Stocks to Compare
More Comparisons
Compare with similar stocks