QQH vs PEO

Comparison between HCM DEFENDER 100 INDEX ETF (QQH, ETF) and Adams Natural Resources Fund Inc (PEO, ETF).

5-Year PerformancePEO has outperformed QQH, delivering a return of +18.2% compared to +13.3%

QQH vs PEO - Performance Comparison

Log

Key Characteristics

Financial metrics and valuation ratios

Metric	QQH(ETF)	PEO(ETF)
Net Assets	$799M	$797M
Expense Ratio	0.98%	N/A
Max Drawdown	41.87%	86.24%
Sharpe Ratio	1.17	1.49
5Y Beta	1.15	0.53
P/E Ratio	34.80	N/A
Forward P/E	25.46	N/A
PEG Ratio	0.35	N/A
5Y Dividends CAGR	N/A	28.22%
5Y EPS CAGR	31.42%	N/A
Debt to Equity	35.61%	N/A
P/S Ratio	6.03	N/A
P/B Ratio	9.43	N/A

Net Assets

Winner

QQH

$799M

PEO

$797M

Expense Ratio

QQH

0.98%

PEO

N/A

Max Drawdown

Winner

QQH

41.87%

PEO

86.24%

Sharpe Ratio

QQH

1.17

Winner

PEO

1.49

5Y Beta

QQH

1.15

Winner

PEO

0.53

P/E Ratio

QQH

34.80

PEO

N/A

Forward P/E

QQH

25.46

PEO

N/A

PEG Ratio

QQH

0.35

PEO

N/A

5Y Dividends CAGR

QQH

N/A

PEO

28.22%

5Y EPS CAGR

QQH

31.42%

PEO

N/A

Debt to Equity

QQH

35.61%

PEO

N/A

P/S Ratio

QQH

6.03

PEO

N/A

P/B Ratio

QQH

9.43

PEO

N/A

QQH vs PEO - Historical Returns

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

Period	QQH	PEO
1 month	+0.75%	-0.96%
3 months	+14.51%	-1.31%
6 months	+8.98%	+23.81%
1 year	+30.74%	+31.88%
5 years(CAGR)	+13.32%	+18.25%
10 years(CAGR)	N/A	+10.18%
Max(CAGR)	+19.97%	+7.83%

Winner

QQH

+0.75%

PEO

-0.96%

Winner

QQH

+14.51%

PEO

-1.31%

QQH

+8.98%

Winner

PEO

+23.81%

QQH

+30.74%

Winner

PEO

+31.88%

5Y(CAGR)

QQH

+13.32%

Winner

PEO

+18.25%

10Y(CAGR)

QQH

N/A

PEO

+10.18%

Max(CAGR)

Winner

QQH

+19.97%

PEO

+7.83%

QQH vs PEO - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

Year	QQH	PEO
2026	+9.30%	+22.01%
2025	+16.29%	+8.90%
2024	+37.02%	+11.91%
2023	+48.35%	+3.91%
2022	-40.58%	+39.27%
2021	+40.68%	+53.52%
2020	+39.19%	-27.08%
2019	+15.13%	+18.97%
2018	N/A	-24.05%
2017	N/A	+3.47%
2016	N/A	+21.94%
2015	N/A	-20.12%
2014	N/A	-5.87%
2013	N/A	+19.97%
2012	N/A	+1.70%
2011	N/A	-2.82%
2010	N/A	+16.74%
2009	N/A	+22.89%
2008	N/A	-42.98%
2007	N/A	+32.34%
2006	N/A	+12.95%
2005	N/A	+34.04%
2004	N/A	+15.02%
2003	N/A	+29.79%
2002	N/A	-12.73%
2001	N/A	-9.45%
2000	N/A	+35.62%
1999	N/A	-2.66%

QQH vs PEO Drawdown Comparison

The maximum drawdown for QQH was -41.87%, occurring on Dec 28, 2022. Recovery took 612 trading sessions.

The maximum drawdown for PEO was -71.90%, occurring on Mar 18, 2020. Recovery took 1896 trading sessions.

The current QQH drawdown is -5.87%. The current PEO drawdown is -7.08%.

Rank	QQH	PEO
#1	-41.87% Dec 28, 2021 - Jun 5, 2024	-71.90% Jul 24, 2014 - Feb 2, 2022
#2	-28.74% Feb 19, 2020 - Jul 20, 2020	-59.45% May 20, 2008 - Apr 3, 2014
#3	-24.84% Dec 16, 2024 - Aug 12, 2025	-40.24% May 22, 2001 - Oct 6, 2004
#4	-17.85% Sep 2, 2020 - Dec 7, 2020	-24.30% Jun 8, 2022 - Jan 26, 2023
#5	-16.18% Oct 29, 2025 - May 8, 2026	-18.84% Nov 22, 2024 - Dec 1, 2025
#6	-15.69% Jul 10, 2024 - Nov 7, 2024	-16.37% Jan 26, 2023 - Aug 9, 2023
#7	-14.63% Feb 12, 2021 - Apr 9, 2021	-15.32% May 10, 2006 - Aug 9, 2006
#8	-10.73% Sep 7, 2021 - Oct 28, 2021	-15.27% Dec 26, 2007 - Apr 15, 2008
#9	-10.19% Jun 2, 2026 - Jun 10, 2026	-15.23% Sep 19, 2005 - Dec 12, 2005
#10	-10.13% Apr 16, 2021 - Jun 14, 2021	-14.93% Nov 17, 1999 - Mar 31, 2000
#11	-8.12% Nov 19, 2021 - Dec 28, 2021	-13.35% Jul 19, 2007 - Sep 21, 2007
#12	-5.76% Jul 20, 2020 - Aug 3, 2020	-12.60% Aug 9, 2006 - Nov 9, 2006
#13	-5.50% Jan 25, 2021 - Feb 4, 2021	-12.23% Mar 4, 2005 - Jun 20, 2005
#14	-4.96% Oct 8, 2025 - Oct 24, 2025	-11.80% Sep 5, 2023 - Mar 13, 2024
#15	-4.75% Aug 6, 2020 - Aug 17, 2020	-11.79% Oct 12, 2000 - Jan 25, 2001

Correlation

Correlation between QQH and PEO is 0.81 which considered as a strong positive correlation - the stocks tend to move together.

0.81

-101

Dividend Comparison (2000 - 2026)

QQH vs PEO dividend yield comparison.

Year	QQH	PEO
2026	0.00%	3.91%
2025	0.21%	9.43%
2024	0.24%	8.14%
2023	0.27%	6.54%
2022	0.00%	7.48%
2021	0.00%	5.51%
2020	0.00%	6.42%
2019	0.21%	6.68%
2018	0.00%	5.63%
2017	0.00%	5.95%
2016	0.00%	5.65%
2015	0.00%	7.78%
2014	0.00%	7.84%
2013	0.00%	6.76%
2012	0.00%	6.69%
2011	0.00%	8.21%
2010	0.00%	4.70%
2009	0.00%	5.90%
2008	0.00%	15.20%
2007	0.00%	11.07%
2006	0.00%	11.06%
2005	0.00%	5.50%
2004	0.00%	5.12%
2003	0.00%	5.01%
2002	0.00%	5.79%
2001	0.00%	6.18%
2000	0.00%	5.43%