QLTA vs EMO

Comparison between ISHARES AAA - A RATED CORPORATE BOND ETF (QLTA, ETF) and ClearBridge Energy Midstream Opportunity Fund Inc (EMO, ETF).

5-Year PerformanceEMO has outperformed QLTA, delivering a return of +30.4% compared to -0.4%

QLTA vs EMO - Performance Comparison

Log

Key Characteristics

Financial metrics and valuation ratios

Metric	QLTA(ETF)	EMO(ETF)
Net Assets	$1.20B	$1.20B
Expense Ratio	0.15%	N/A
Max Drawdown	26.32%	97.19%
Sharpe Ratio	-0.48	1.02
5Y Beta	0.11	0.48
5Y Dividends CAGR	10.99%	28.59%

Net Assets

QLTA

$1.20B

EMO

$1.20B

Expense Ratio

QLTA

0.15%

EMO

N/A

Max Drawdown

Winner

QLTA

26.32%

EMO

97.19%

Sharpe Ratio

QLTA

-0.48

Winner

EMO

1.02

5Y Beta

Winner

QLTA

0.11

EMO

0.48

5Y Dividends CAGR

QLTA

10.99%

Winner

EMO

28.59%

QLTA vs EMO - Historical Returns

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

Period	QLTA	EMO
1 month	-0.56%	+2.08%
3 months	-0.64%	+4.43%
6 months	-0.99%	+9.34%
1 year	+1.78%	+19.56%
5 years(CAGR)	-0.41%	+30.44%
10 years(CAGR)	+1.74%	+7.19%
Max(CAGR)	+2.44%	+4.19%

QLTA

-0.56%

Winner

EMO

+2.08%

QLTA

-0.64%

Winner

EMO

+4.43%

QLTA

-0.99%

Winner

EMO

+9.34%

QLTA

+1.78%

Winner

EMO

+19.56%

5Y(CAGR)

QLTA

-0.41%

Winner

EMO

+30.44%

10Y(CAGR)

QLTA

+1.74%

Winner

EMO

+7.19%

Max(CAGR)

QLTA

+2.44%

Winner

EMO

+4.19%

QLTA vs EMO - Annual Returns (2011 - 2026)

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

Year	QLTA	EMO
2026	-0.40%	+19.07%
2025	+7.38%	+6.99%
2024	+1.84%	+44.57%
2023	+6.96%	+36.60%
2022	-14.44%	+34.91%
2021	-1.97%	+74.02%
2020	+9.46%	-65.02%
2019	+12.41%	+15.33%
2018	-1.81%	-27.49%
2017	+5.55%	-1.34%
2016	+4.23%	+13.87%
2015	+0.13%	-42.18%
2014	+6.39%	+9.30%
2013	-2.60%	+13.80%
2012	+6.22%	+15.44%
2011	N/A	-1.56%

QLTA vs EMO Drawdown Comparison

The maximum drawdown for QLTA was -22.28%, occurring on Oct 20, 2022. This drawdown has not yet recovered.

The maximum drawdown for EMO was -95.09%, occurring on Mar 18, 2020. Recovery took 2614 trading sessions.

The current QLTA drawdown is -4.19%. The current EMO drawdown is -3.34%.

Rank	QLTA	EMO
#1	-22.28% Aug 6, 2020 - Oct 20, 2022	-95.09% Aug 28, 2014 - Jan 21, 2025
#2	-15.24% Mar 6, 2020 - May 29, 2020	-22.28% Jul 27, 2011 - Feb 10, 2012
#3	-7.06% May 2, 2013 - May 27, 2014	-18.81% Apr 2, 2025 - Aug 29, 2025
#4	-5.63% Jul 8, 2016 - Aug 23, 2017	-13.19% Oct 4, 2012 - Jan 2, 2013
#5	-4.40% Jan 30, 2015 - Mar 15, 2016	-11.04% May 24, 2013 - May 7, 2014
#6	-4.28% Dec 29, 2017 - Jan 31, 2019	-10.87% Aug 29, 2025 - Jan 13, 2026
#7	-2.71% Sep 4, 2019 - Dec 27, 2019	-10.63% Mar 25, 2026 - Jul 24, 2026
#8	-2.24% Jul 25, 2012 - Sep 24, 2012	-9.78% Mar 27, 2012 - Jul 18, 2012
#9	-2.20% Dec 6, 2012 - Apr 8, 2013	-7.80% Jan 21, 2025 - Apr 2, 2025
#10	-1.78% Feb 28, 2012 - May 1, 2012	-7.03% Jul 1, 2014 - Aug 20, 2014
#11	-1.70% Aug 27, 2014 - Oct 7, 2014	-4.68% Jul 24, 2026 - Aug 5, 2026
#12	-1.53% Oct 17, 2014 - Jan 2, 2015	-4.30% Feb 28, 2013 - Mar 27, 2013
#13	-1.43% May 5, 2016 - Jun 3, 2016	-4.12% Feb 8, 2013 - Feb 27, 2013
#14	-1.21% Jul 3, 2019 - Aug 1, 2019	-4.04% Aug 20, 2012 - Sep 20, 2012
#15	-1.06% Sep 7, 2017 - Dec 13, 2017	-3.96% Mar 2, 2026 - Mar 20, 2026

Correlation

Correlation between QLTA and EMO is -0.26 which considered as a very weak or no correlation - the stocks move independently of each other.

-0.26

-101

Dividend Comparison (2011 - 2026)

QLTA vs EMO dividend yield comparison.

Year	QLTA	EMO
2026	2.72%	4.94%
2025	4.33%	9.41%
2024	4.11%	7.15%
2023	3.39%	6.79%
2022	2.79%	6.71%
2021	1.96%	6.71%
2020	2.31%	15.82%
2019	2.99%	10.94%
2018	3.09%	16.39%
2017	2.67%	10.85%
2016	2.59%	9.76%
2015	2.99%	11.88%
2014	2.32%	5.91%
2013	2.14%	5.89%
2012	1.94%	6.44%
2011	0.00%	3.46%