QAT vs CLSM

Comparison between ISHARES MSCI QATAR ETF (QAT, ETF) and ETC CABANA TARGET LEADING SECTOR MODERATE ETF (CLSM, ETF).

5-Year PerformanceCLSM has outperformed QAT, delivering a return of +3.4% compared to +3.2%

QAT vs CLSM - Performance Comparison

Log

Key Characteristics

Financial metrics and valuation ratios

Metric	QAT(ETF)	CLSM(ETF)
Net Assets	$93M	$93M
Expense Ratio	0.60%	0.82%
Max Drawdown	51.05%	33.55%
Sharpe Ratio	-0.05	1.70
5Y Beta	0.34	0.75
5Y Dividends CAGR	14.30%	N/A

Net Assets

Winner

QAT

$93M

CLSM

$93M

Expense Ratio

Winner

QAT

0.60%

CLSM

0.82%

Max Drawdown

QAT

51.05%

Winner

CLSM

33.55%

Sharpe Ratio

QAT

-0.05

Winner

CLSM

1.70

5Y Beta

Winner

QAT

0.34

CLSM

0.75

5Y Dividends CAGR

QAT

14.30%

CLSM

N/A

QAT vs CLSM - Historical Returns

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

Period	QAT	CLSM
1 month	-1.27%	+3.25%
3 months	-1.27%	+13.32%
6 months	-0.45%	+14.89%
1 year	+2.76%	+29.52%
5 years(CAGR)	+3.24%	+3.41%
10 years(CAGR)	+4.25%	N/A
Max(CAGR)	+1.23%	+3.41%

QAT

-1.27%

Winner

CLSM

+3.25%

QAT

-1.27%

Winner

CLSM

+13.32%

QAT

-0.45%

Winner

CLSM

+14.89%

QAT

+2.76%

Winner

CLSM

+29.52%

5Y(CAGR)

QAT

+3.24%

Winner

CLSM

+3.41%

10Y(CAGR)

QAT

+4.25%

CLSM

N/A

Max(CAGR)

QAT

+1.23%

Winner

CLSM

+3.41%

QAT vs CLSM - Annual Returns (2014 - 2026)

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

Year	QAT	CLSM
2026	-1.09%	+15.30%
2025	+9.02%	+15.26%
2024	+4.05%	+1.42%
2023	+1.14%	+3.95%
2022	-5.35%	-23.96%
2021	+13.19%	+9.10%
2020	+5.61%	N/A
2019	+0.68%	N/A
2018	+19.11%	N/A
2017	-12.89%	N/A
2016	+7.91%	N/A
2015	-14.63%	N/A
2014	-3.19%	N/A

QAT vs CLSM Drawdown Comparison

The maximum drawdown for QAT was -45.16%, occurring on Nov 21, 2017. Recovery took 1876 trading sessions.

The maximum drawdown for CLSM was -27.76%, occurring on Apr 8, 2025. Recovery took 1083 trading sessions.

The current QAT drawdown is -13.40%. The current CLSM drawdown is -4.55%.

Rank	QAT	CLSM
#1	-45.16% May 30, 2014 - Nov 9, 2021	-27.76% Dec 27, 2021 - Apr 22, 2026
#2	-33.18% Apr 11, 2022 - Oct 27, 2023	-5.24% Sep 2, 2021 - Oct 21, 2021
#3	-5.29% Nov 15, 2021 - Jan 12, 2022	-4.61% Nov 19, 2021 - Dec 27, 2021
#4	-4.28% May 13, 2014 - May 27, 2014	-4.55% Jun 2, 2026 - Jun 5, 2026
#5	-3.88% Mar 8, 2022 - Mar 25, 2022	-2.26% Jul 14, 2021 - Jul 22, 2021
#6	-3.61% Feb 11, 2022 - Mar 1, 2022	-2.16% Nov 5, 2021 - Nov 19, 2021
#7	-1.42% Jan 19, 2022 - Jan 31, 2022	-1.92% May 14, 2026 - May 26, 2026
#8	-1.19% Mar 25, 2022 - Apr 4, 2022	-1.91% Jul 26, 2021 - Aug 23, 2021
#9	-1.11% May 5, 2014 - May 12, 2014	-1.05% Apr 24, 2026 - Apr 30, 2026
#10	-0.94% Apr 4, 2022 - Apr 7, 2022	-0.62% Aug 25, 2021 - Aug 27, 2021
#11	-0.86% Mar 2, 2022 - Mar 8, 2022	-0.50% Oct 21, 2021 - Oct 25, 2021
#12	-0.58% May 27, 2014 - May 29, 2014	-0.46% May 1, 2026 - May 5, 2026
#13	-0.51% Feb 3, 2022 - Feb 9, 2022	-0.40% May 11, 2026 - May 13, 2026
#14	-0.32% Nov 9, 2021 - Nov 11, 2021	-0.19% Apr 22, 2026 - Apr 24, 2026
#15	-0.14% Apr 7, 2022 - Apr 11, 2022	-0.16% May 6, 2026 - May 8, 2026

Correlation

Correlation between QAT and CLSM is 0.49 which considered as a weak positive correlation - the stocks show a slight tendency to move together.

0.49

-101

Dividend Comparison (2015 - 2025)

QAT vs CLSM dividend yield comparison.

Year	QAT	CLSM
2025	3.51%	0.90%
2024	5.90%	2.13%
2023	3.92%	2.58%
2022	4.78%	3.17%
2021	2.33%	0.59%
2020	2.63%	0.00%
2019	3.57%	0.00%
2018	4.63%	0.00%
2017	4.10%	0.00%
2016	3.51%	0.00%
2015	4.49%	0.00%