PUK vs TRI
Comparison between Prudential plc (PUK, Company) and Thomson-Reuters Corp (TRI, Company).
PUK is from the Financial Services sector, while TRI is from the Industrials sector.
5-Year PerformanceTRI has outperformed PUK, delivering a return of -2.6% compared to -4.8%
PUK vs TRI - Performance Comparison
Key Characteristics
Financial metrics and valuation ratios
PUK vs TRI - Historical Returns
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
PUK vs TRI - Annual Returns (2000 - 2026)
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
| Year | PUK | TRI |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | -14.18% | -36.88% |
| 2025 | +102.41% | -17.06% |
| 2024 | -24.68% | +12.82% |
| 2023 | -19.00% | +28.64% |
| 2022 | -20.88% | -0.97% |
| 2021 | -1.20% | +51.02% |
| 2020 | -2.38% | +15.80% |
| 2019 | +29.52% | +53.97% |
| 2018 | -28.65% | +14.09% |
| 2017 | +30.01% | +2.50% |
| 2016 | -4.56% | +22.07% |
| 2015 | +0.73% | -2.07% |
| 2014 | +6.71% | +13.45% |
| 2013 | +56.31% | +33.37% |
| 2012 | +46.11% | +12.37% |
| 2011 | -2.79% | -27.57% |
| 2010 | +4.41% | +17.92% |
| 2009 | +73.80% | +16.31% |
| 2008 | -53.90% | -26.04% |
| 2007 | +3.47% | -0.57% |
| 2006 | +43.19% | +22.33% |
| 2005 | +15.14% | +0.75% |
| 2004 | +6.69% | -2.37% |
| 2003 | +22.50% | +37.12% |
| 2002 | -38.91% | -12.38% |
| 2001 | -25.12% | N/A |
| 2000 | +187.24% | N/A |
PUK vs TRI Drawdown Comparison
The maximum drawdown for PUK was -82.51%, occurring on Mar 9, 2009. Recovery took 1352 trading sessions.
The maximum drawdown for TRI was -62.55%, occurring on May 14, 2026. This drawdown has not yet recovered.
The current PUK drawdown is -30.56%. The current TRI drawdown is -62.48%.
| Rank | PUK | TRI |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | -82.51% May 7, 2007 - Sep 14, 2012 | -62.55% Jul 14, 2025 - May 14, 2026 |
| #2 | -68.74% Jan 3, 2001 - Mar 20, 2006 | -56.41% Oct 31, 2007 - Nov 6, 2013 |
| #3 | -63.59% Oct 7, 2021 - Jan 13, 2025 | -35.36% Feb 19, 2020 - Oct 5, 2020 |
| #4 | -63.54% Jan 24, 2018 - May 7, 2021 | -26.73% Jun 28, 2002 - May 20, 2003 |
| #5 | -41.52% May 21, 2015 - Jul 31, 2017 | -24.61% Nov 19, 2021 - Feb 13, 2023 |
| #6 | -23.52% Mar 20, 2006 - Nov 17, 2006 | -20.38% Oct 17, 2017 - Oct 3, 2018 |
| #7 | -20.02% May 7, 2021 - Oct 7, 2021 | -18.30% Jan 2, 2004 - Nov 16, 2004 |
| #8 | -19.39% Jul 21, 2000 - Nov 30, 2000 | -17.36% Oct 22, 2015 - Apr 26, 2016 |
| #9 | -15.09% Jan 10, 2014 - Mar 4, 2014 | -14.34% Jun 27, 2023 - Nov 17, 2023 |
| #10 | -14.02% Jan 17, 2007 - Mar 20, 2007 | -13.21% Feb 17, 2005 - Aug 10, 2005 |
| #11 | -13.46% May 21, 2013 - Aug 2, 2013 | -11.96% May 24, 2024 - Feb 6, 2025 |
| #12 | -13.11% Aug 25, 2014 - Jan 26, 2015 | -11.63% Nov 14, 2013 - Jul 9, 2014 |
| #13 | -11.07% Aug 12, 2013 - Sep 16, 2013 | -11.24% Sep 19, 2005 - Feb 15, 2006 |
| #14 | -8.82% Mar 14, 2013 - Apr 26, 2013 | -11.20% Apr 15, 2015 - Oct 12, 2015 |
| #15 | -7.41% Mar 12, 2014 - Apr 30, 2014 | -10.65% Jul 17, 2007 - Oct 5, 2007 |
Correlation
Correlation between PUK and TRI is 0.41 which considered as a weak positive correlation - the stocks show a slight tendency to move together.
Dividend Comparison (2000 - 2026)
PUK vs TRI dividend yield comparison.
| Year | PUK | TRI |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 1.41% | 3.51% |
| 2025 | 1.54% | 1.80% |
| 2024 | 2.64% | 1.35% |
| 2023 | 1.72% | 4.68% |
| 2022 | 1.28% | 1.56% |
| 2021 | 4.60% | 1.76% |
| 2020 | 1.70% | 1.86% |
| 2019 | 17.06% | 2.01% |
| 2018 | 3.71% | 2.87% |
| 2017 | 2.33% | 3.17% |
| 2016 | 3.50% | 3.11% |
| 2015 | 2.62% | 3.54% |
| 2014 | 2.53% | 4.51% |
| 2013 | 2.09% | 3.44% |
| 2012 | 2.84% | 4.41% |
| 2011 | 4.05% | 4.65% |
| 2010 | 2.90% | 3.11% |
| 2009 | 2.99% | 3.47% |
| 2008 | 5.57% | 2.77% |
| 2007 | 2.42% | 1.80% |
| 2006 | 2.21% | 2.12% |
| 2005 | 3.02% | 2.28% |
| 2004 | 6.16% | 2.14% |
| 2003 | 4.28% | 3.18% |
| 2002 | 5.50% | 1.33% |
| 2001 | 3.03% | 0.00% |
| 2000 | 0.73% | 0.00% |
Select Stocks to Compare
More Comparisons
Compare with similar stocks