PUK vs MTB
Comparison between Prudential plc (PUK, Company) and M & T Bank Corp (MTB, Company).
Both PUK and MTB are from the Financial Services sector.
5-Year PerformanceMTB has outperformed PUK, delivering a return of +15.7% compared to -2.2%
PUK vs MTB - Performance Comparison
Key Characteristics
Financial metrics and valuation ratios
PUK vs MTB - Historical Returns
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
PUK vs MTB - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
| Year | PUK | MTB |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | -6.84% | +23.46% |
| 2025 | +102.41% | +10.48% |
| 2024 | -24.68% | +39.71% |
| 2023 | -19.00% | -1.61% |
| 2022 | -20.88% | -5.85% |
| 2021 | -1.20% | +24.76% |
| 2020 | -2.38% | -22.69% |
| 2019 | +29.52% | +20.18% |
| 2018 | -28.65% | -14.69% |
| 2017 | +30.01% | +11.15% |
| 2016 | -4.56% | +36.28% |
| 2015 | +0.73% | -1.12% |
| 2014 | +6.71% | +11.72% |
| 2013 | +56.31% | +18.22% |
| 2012 | +46.11% | +30.33% |
| 2011 | -2.79% | -10.03% |
| 2010 | +4.41% | +34.50% |
| 2009 | +73.80% | +23.24% |
| 2008 | -53.90% | -25.55% |
| 2007 | +3.47% | -31.82% |
| 2006 | +43.19% | +12.19% |
| 2005 | +15.14% | +4.73% |
| 2004 | +6.69% | +12.23% |
| 2003 | +22.50% | +22.06% |
| 2002 | -38.91% | +10.99% |
| 2001 | -25.12% | +13.92% |
| 2000 | +187.24% | +69.50% |
| 1999 | N/A | -16.09% |
PUK vs MTB Drawdown Comparison
The maximum drawdown for PUK was -82.51%, occurring on Mar 9, 2009. Recovery took 1352 trading sessions.
The maximum drawdown for MTB was -73.52%, occurring on Mar 5, 2009. Recovery took 1428 trading sessions.
The current PUK drawdown is -24.62%.
| Rank | PUK | MTB |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | -82.51% May 7, 2007 - Sep 14, 2012 | -73.52% Feb 20, 2007 - Oct 17, 2012 |
| #2 | -68.74% Jan 3, 2001 - Mar 20, 2006 | -52.97% Mar 9, 2018 - Jan 7, 2022 |
| #3 | -63.59% Oct 7, 2021 - Jan 13, 2025 | -40.69% Sep 12, 2022 - Sep 19, 2024 |
| #4 | -63.54% Jan 24, 2018 - May 7, 2021 | -28.19% Nov 25, 2024 - Jan 8, 2026 |
| #5 | -41.52% May 21, 2015 - Jul 31, 2017 | -26.75% Nov 2, 1999 - Aug 4, 2000 |
| #6 | -23.52% Mar 20, 2006 - Nov 17, 2006 | -23.95% May 17, 2002 - May 30, 2003 |
| #7 | -20.02% May 7, 2021 - Oct 7, 2021 | -23.47% Jul 22, 2015 - Nov 9, 2016 |
| #8 | -19.39% Jul 21, 2000 - Nov 30, 2000 | -19.77% Jul 20, 2001 - Mar 14, 2002 |
| #9 | -15.09% Jan 10, 2014 - Mar 4, 2014 | -18.02% Feb 16, 2022 - Aug 10, 2022 |
| #10 | -14.02% Jan 17, 2007 - Mar 20, 2007 | -16.99% Feb 6, 2026 - Jun 25, 2026 |
| #11 | -13.46% May 21, 2013 - Aug 2, 2013 | -16.08% Mar 1, 2017 - Dec 1, 2017 |
| #12 | -13.11% Aug 25, 2014 - Jan 26, 2015 | -15.04% Dec 30, 2003 - Aug 18, 2004 |
| #13 | -11.07% Aug 12, 2013 - Sep 16, 2013 | -13.61% Jan 14, 2022 - Feb 16, 2022 |
| #14 | -8.82% Mar 14, 2013 - Apr 26, 2013 | -12.43% Mar 7, 2001 - Mar 30, 2001 |
| #15 | -7.41% Mar 12, 2014 - Apr 30, 2014 | -12.30% Dec 5, 2014 - Mar 20, 2015 |
Correlation
Correlation between PUK and MTB is 0.73 which considered as a strong positive correlation - the stocks tend to move together.
Dividend Comparison (1999 - 2026)
PUK vs MTB dividend yield comparison.
| Year | PUK | MTB |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 1.30% | 1.21% |
| 2025 | 1.54% | 3.24% |
| 2024 | 2.64% | 2.85% |
| 2023 | 1.72% | 3.79% |
| 2022 | 1.28% | 3.31% |
| 2021 | 4.60% | 2.93% |
| 2020 | 1.70% | 3.46% |
| 2019 | 17.06% | 2.42% |
| 2018 | 3.71% | 2.48% |
| 2017 | 2.33% | 1.75% |
| 2016 | 3.50% | 1.79% |
| 2015 | 2.62% | 2.31% |
| 2014 | 2.53% | 2.23% |
| 2013 | 2.09% | 2.41% |
| 2012 | 2.84% | 2.84% |
| 2011 | 4.05% | 3.67% |
| 2010 | 2.90% | 3.22% |
| 2009 | 2.99% | 4.19% |
| 2008 | 5.57% | 4.88% |
| 2007 | 2.42% | 3.19% |
| 2006 | 2.21% | 1.84% |
| 2005 | 3.02% | 1.60% |
| 2004 | 6.16% | 1.48% |
| 2003 | 4.28% | 1.22% |
| 2002 | 5.50% | 1.32% |
| 2001 | 3.03% | 1.37% |
| 2000 | 0.73% | 0.92% |
| 1999 | 0.00% | 0.30% |
Select Stocks to Compare
More Comparisons
Compare with similar stocks