PM vs WFC
Comparison between Philip Morris International Inc (PM, Company) and Wells Fargo & Company (WFC, Company).
PM is from the Consumer Defensive sector, while WFC is from the Financial Services sector.
5-Year PerformancePM has outperformed WFC, delivering a return of +19.8% compared to +16.7%
PM vs WFC - Performance Comparison
Key Characteristics
Financial metrics and valuation ratios
PM vs WFC - Historical Returns
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
PM vs WFC - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
| Year | PM | WFC |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | +19.33% | -6.84% |
| 2025 | +37.15% | +35.66% |
| 2024 | +32.25% | +46.15% |
| 2023 | -1.87% | +21.46% |
| 2022 | +11.50% | -16.66% |
| 2021 | +22.71% | +63.73% |
| 2020 | +3.74% | -41.61% |
| 2019 | +33.87% | +19.18% |
| 2018 | -32.43% | -22.36% |
| 2017 | +20.22% | +11.39% |
| 2016 | +9.71% | +7.53% |
| 2015 | +14.02% | +2.07% |
| 2014 | -0.86% | +25.14% |
| 2013 | +4.62% | +33.32% |
| 2012 | +10.48% | +23.48% |
| 2011 | +39.42% | -11.23% |
| 2010 | +24.21% | +14.23% |
| 2009 | +14.91% | -7.77% |
| 2008 | -9.06% | +5.69% |
| 2007 | N/A | -12.57% |
| 2006 | N/A | +15.04% |
| 2005 | N/A | +4.88% |
| 2004 | N/A | +10.32% |
| 2003 | N/A | +24.92% |
| 2002 | N/A | +10.33% |
| 2001 | N/A | -17.66% |
| 2000 | N/A | +45.45% |
| 1999 | N/A | -13.36% |
PM vs WFC Drawdown Comparison
The maximum drawdown for PM was -42.75%, occurring on Mar 23, 2020. Recovery took 1002 trading sessions.
The maximum drawdown for WFC was -78.98%, occurring on Mar 5, 2009. Recovery took 1122 trading sessions.
The current PM drawdown is -2.56%. The current WFC drawdown is -7.99%.
| Rank | PM | WFC |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | -42.75% Jun 19, 2017 - Jun 11, 2021 | -78.98% Sep 19, 2008 - Mar 7, 2013 |
| #2 | -40.87% Aug 12, 2008 - Mar 19, 2010 | -64.47% Jan 26, 2018 - Feb 8, 2022 |
| #3 | -22.74% Feb 17, 2022 - May 9, 2024 | -43.56% Oct 5, 2007 - Sep 18, 2008 |
| #4 | -20.63% Jun 23, 2025 - Feb 4, 2026 | -37.07% Feb 9, 2022 - Mar 4, 2024 |
| #5 | -19.33% Apr 12, 2013 - Oct 15, 2015 | -35.23% Nov 16, 1999 - Jun 2, 2000 |
| #6 | -18.53% Feb 25, 2026 - May 14, 2026 | -29.24% Dec 28, 2000 - Jul 14, 2003 |
| #7 | -18.47% Apr 12, 2010 - Aug 9, 2010 | -24.73% Feb 6, 2025 - Jul 1, 2025 |
| #8 | -17.97% Sep 3, 2021 - Jan 14, 2022 | -23.01% Jan 6, 2026 - May 15, 2026 |
| #9 | -14.85% Jul 15, 2016 - Feb 7, 2017 | -22.43% Jul 22, 2015 - Dec 7, 2016 |
| #10 | -13.61% Jul 28, 2011 - Oct 28, 2011 | -19.77% Jun 2, 2000 - Oct 3, 2000 |
| #11 | -12.11% Oct 5, 2012 - Feb 21, 2013 | -16.65% May 15, 2024 - Oct 14, 2024 |
| #12 | -10.98% Nov 29, 2024 - Feb 6, 2025 | -15.81% Mar 1, 2017 - Dec 5, 2017 |
| #13 | -10.01% May 14, 2026 - Jul 17, 2026 | -12.69% Oct 3, 2000 - Nov 9, 2000 |
| #14 | -9.30% May 2, 2012 - Jul 3, 2012 | -11.11% Nov 26, 2024 - Jan 21, 2025 |
| #15 | -8.41% May 31, 2011 - Jul 21, 2011 | -10.33% Sep 19, 2014 - Nov 3, 2014 |
Correlation
Correlation between PM and WFC is 0.93 which considered as a very strong positive correlation - the stocks move almost identically together.
Dividend Comparison (1999 - 2026)
PM vs WFC dividend yield comparison.
| Year | PM | WFC |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 1.56% | 1.03% |
| 2025 | 3.52% | 1.82% |
| 2024 | 4.40% | 2.14% |
| 2023 | 5.46% | 2.64% |
| 2022 | 4.98% | 2.66% |
| 2021 | 5.16% | 1.25% |
| 2020 | 5.73% | 4.04% |
| 2019 | 5.43% | 3.57% |
| 2018 | 6.73% | 3.56% |
| 2017 | 3.99% | 2.54% |
| 2016 | 4.50% | 2.75% |
| 2015 | 4.60% | 2.71% |
| 2014 | 4.76% | 2.46% |
| 2013 | 4.11% | 2.53% |
| 2012 | 3.87% | 2.57% |
| 2011 | 3.59% | 1.74% |
| 2010 | 4.17% | 0.65% |
| 2009 | 4.65% | 1.82% |
| 2008 | 3.54% | 4.41% |
| 2007 | 0.00% | 3.91% |
| 2006 | 0.00% | 3.04% |
| 2005 | 0.00% | 3.18% |
| 2004 | 0.00% | 2.99% |
| 2003 | 0.00% | 2.55% |
| 2002 | 0.00% | 2.35% |
| 2001 | 0.00% | 2.30% |
| 2000 | 0.00% | 1.62% |
| 1999 | 0.00% | 0.49% |
Select Stocks to Compare
More Comparisons
Compare with similar stocks