PLG vs CMT
Comparison between Platinum Group Metals Ltd (PLG, Company) and Core Molding Technologies (CMT, Company).
Both PLG and CMT are from the Basic Materials sector.
5-Year PerformanceCMT has outperformed PLG, delivering a return of +12.5% compared to -19.5%
PLG vs CMT - Performance Comparison
Key Characteristics
Financial metrics and valuation ratios
PLG vs CMT - Historical Returns
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
PLG vs CMT - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
| Year | PLG | CMT |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | -39.48% | +17.99% |
| 2025 | +74.81% | +28.53% |
| 2024 | +13.27% | -7.08% |
| 2023 | -32.94% | +41.45% |
| 2022 | +2.96% | +52.64% |
| 2021 | -68.40% | -36.25% |
| 2020 | +159.22% | +326.67% |
| 2019 | +6.96% | -57.46% |
| 2018 | -57.43% | -65.50% |
| 2017 | -81.58% | +31.58% |
| 2016 | -1.24% | +39.67% |
| 2015 | -71.54% | -7.83% |
| 2014 | -57.66% | +4.48% |
| 2013 | +40.14% | +102.96% |
| 2012 | -13.47% | -19.66% |
| 2011 | -68.13% | +37.35% |
| 2010 | +21.46% | +100.00% |
| 2009 | +25.44% | -0.35% |
| 2008 | -63.72% | -63.38% |
| 2007 | +115.05% | -24.41% |
| 2006 | +50.00% | +29.37% |
| 2005 | +58.22% | +177.17% |
| 2004 | +27.82% | -6.10% |
| 2003 | +891.40% | +165.45% |
| 2002 | +68.42% | -25.17% |
| 2001 | N/A | +67.05% |
| 2000 | N/A | -66.67% |
| 1999 | N/A | +36.69% |
PLG vs CMT Drawdown Comparison
The maximum drawdown for PLG was -99.81%, occurring on Jun 11, 2018. This drawdown has not yet recovered.
The maximum drawdown for CMT was -96.21%, occurring on Apr 8, 2020. Recovery took 2090 trading sessions.
The current PLG drawdown is -99.70%. The current CMT drawdown is -22.56%.
| Rank | PLG | CMT |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | -99.81% Oct 29, 2007 - Jun 11, 2018 | -96.21% Jun 10, 2015 - Sep 28, 2023 |
| #2 | -55.68% Jan 29, 2003 - Sep 2, 2003 | -90.74% Jun 7, 2005 - Dec 27, 2013 |
| #3 | -43.23% Mar 8, 2004 - Jun 8, 2004 | -76.87% Dec 22, 1999 - Aug 25, 2003 |
| #4 | -40.89% Mar 9, 2005 - Aug 11, 2005 | -55.95% Oct 2, 2023 - Mar 3, 2025 |
| #5 | -36.29% Nov 5, 2003 - Dec 8, 2003 | -42.96% Mar 31, 2004 - Mar 22, 2005 |
| #6 | -30.82% Jan 23, 2004 - Mar 8, 2004 | -26.50% Apr 8, 2005 - Apr 28, 2005 |
| #7 | -30.09% May 12, 2006 - Nov 21, 2006 | -22.48% Mar 6, 2014 - Mar 18, 2015 |
| #8 | -28.44% Jun 25, 2004 - Sep 13, 2004 | -19.19% Oct 10, 2003 - Jan 21, 2004 |
| #9 | -27.12% Sep 25, 2003 - Oct 15, 2003 | -17.02% Nov 11, 1999 - Dec 2, 1999 |
| #10 | -26.30% Jul 2, 2007 - Oct 12, 2007 | -16.01% Dec 30, 2013 - Feb 14, 2014 |
| #11 | -23.91% Sep 13, 2004 - Oct 28, 2004 | -15.07% Jan 23, 2004 - Feb 10, 2004 |
| #12 | -22.70% Nov 7, 2005 - Mar 2, 2006 | -13.77% Mar 28, 2005 - Apr 6, 2005 |
| #13 | -22.29% Nov 23, 2004 - Mar 7, 2005 | -13.74% May 12, 2005 - May 20, 2005 |
| #14 | -17.82% Feb 16, 2007 - Mar 22, 2007 | -12.89% Dec 2, 1999 - Dec 16, 1999 |
| #15 | -16.86% May 14, 2007 - Jul 2, 2007 | -10.86% Nov 2, 1999 - Nov 11, 1999 |
Correlation
Correlation between PLG and CMT is -0.37 which considered as a weak negative correlation - the stocks show a slight tendency to move in opposite directions.
Dividend Comparison (2003 - 2018)
PLG vs CMT dividend yield comparison.
| Year | PLG | CMT |
|---|---|---|
| 2018 | 0.00% | 1.41% |
| 2017 | 0.00% | 0.46% |
| 2004 | 91.47% | 0.00% |
| 2003 | 67.75% | 0.00% |
Select Stocks to Compare
More Comparisons
Compare with similar stocks