PHM vs L
Comparison between PulteGroup Inc (PHM, Company) and Loews Corp (L, Company).
PHM is from the Consumer Cyclical sector, while L is from the Financial Services sector.
5-Year PerformancePHM has outperformed L, delivering a return of +17.0% compared to +14.0%
PHM vs L - Performance Comparison
Key Characteristics
Financial metrics and valuation ratios
PHM vs L - Historical Returns
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
PHM vs L - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
| Year | PHM | L |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | -2.12% | +4.39% |
| 2025 | +9.82% | +25.47% |
| 2024 | +7.98% | +20.58% |
| 2023 | +125.46% | +19.25% |
| 2022 | -17.68% | +0.81% |
| 2021 | +36.94% | +30.68% |
| 2020 | +13.00% | -14.46% |
| 2019 | +49.88% | +17.03% |
| 2018 | -21.05% | -8.29% |
| 2017 | +81.73% | +7.70% |
| 2016 | +9.17% | +24.72% |
| 2015 | -14.74% | -7.41% |
| 2014 | +8.11% | -10.80% |
| 2013 | +10.47% | +16.79% |
| 2012 | +178.53% | +6.59% |
| 2011 | -18.89% | -3.83% |
| 2010 | -26.56% | +5.39% |
| 2009 | -10.47% | +23.20% |
| 2008 | +6.27% | -43.83% |
| 2007 | -67.13% | +22.76% |
| 2006 | -19.29% | +29.47% |
| 2005 | +24.89% | +37.58% |
| 2004 | +40.78% | +44.03% |
| 2003 | +84.87% | +8.24% |
| 2002 | +8.56% | -18.52% |
| 2001 | +11.32% | +11.69% |
| 2000 | +101.03% | +78.21% |
| 1999 | +9.65% | -9.42% |
PHM vs L Drawdown Comparison
The maximum drawdown for PHM was -92.39%, occurring on Oct 3, 2011. Recovery took 3644 trading sessions.
The maximum drawdown for L was -65.59%, occurring on Mar 9, 2009. Recovery took 2616 trading sessions.
The current PHM drawdown is -21.02%. The current L drawdown is -3.04%.
| Rank | PHM | L |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | -92.39% Jul 28, 2005 - Jan 21, 2020 | -65.59% Jun 19, 2007 - Nov 6, 2017 |
| #2 | -62.09% Feb 11, 2020 - Aug 21, 2020 | -48.52% Jul 3, 2019 - Apr 29, 2021 |
| #3 | -45.40% Apr 27, 2001 - Feb 26, 2002 | -45.96% May 4, 2001 - Nov 29, 2004 |
| #4 | -40.98% May 10, 2021 - Apr 18, 2023 | -41.13% Nov 8, 1999 - Aug 8, 2000 |
| #5 | -38.01% Oct 18, 2024 - Apr 8, 2025 | -26.11% Apr 20, 2022 - Nov 16, 2023 |
| #6 | -37.85% Jun 24, 2002 - May 7, 2003 | -20.02% Jan 26, 2018 - Jun 5, 2019 |
| #7 | -31.65% Nov 16, 1999 - May 16, 2000 | -14.30% Dec 28, 2000 - Feb 5, 2001 |
| #8 | -25.43% Sep 21, 2004 - Dec 15, 2004 | -12.16% Apr 1, 2025 - Jul 1, 2025 |
| #9 | -25.27% Dec 5, 2000 - Apr 24, 2001 | -12.07% May 14, 2021 - Jan 4, 2022 |
| #10 | -20.93% Mar 5, 2004 - Aug 16, 2004 | -9.82% Sep 28, 2000 - Oct 27, 2000 |
| #11 | -19.11% Oct 9, 2000 - Nov 3, 2000 | -9.67% Mar 9, 2001 - Mar 30, 2001 |
| #12 | -18.85% Aug 8, 2023 - Nov 14, 2023 | -9.49% May 5, 2006 - Jul 31, 2006 |
| #13 | -18.38% Jun 16, 2003 - Oct 2, 2003 | -8.29% Jan 13, 2006 - Mar 27, 2006 |
| #14 | -17.87% Oct 12, 2020 - Feb 10, 2021 | -7.89% Apr 30, 2026 - May 11, 2026 |
| #15 | -15.44% Mar 4, 2002 - May 1, 2002 | -7.36% Oct 30, 2000 - Nov 10, 2000 |
Correlation
Correlation between PHM and L is 0.85 which considered as a strong positive correlation - the stocks tend to move together.
Dividend Comparison (1999 - 2026)
PHM vs L dividend yield comparison.
| Year | PHM | L |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 0.22% | 0.06% |
| 2025 | 0.78% | 0.24% |
| 2024 | 0.75% | 0.30% |
| 2023 | 0.66% | 0.36% |
| 2022 | 1.34% | 0.43% |
| 2021 | 1.00% | 0.43% |
| 2020 | 1.16% | 0.56% |
| 2019 | 1.16% | 0.48% |
| 2018 | 1.46% | 0.55% |
| 2017 | 1.08% | 1.58% |
| 2016 | 1.96% | 0.53% |
| 2015 | 1.85% | 0.65% |
| 2014 | 1.07% | 0.59% |
| 2013 | 0.74% | 0.51% |
| 2012 | 0.00% | 0.61% |
| 2011 | 0.00% | 0.66% |
| 2010 | 0.00% | 0.64% |
| 2009 | 0.00% | 0.69% |
| 2008 | 1.46% | 0.88% |
| 2007 | 1.52% | 0.50% |
| 2006 | 0.48% | 0.57% |
| 2005 | 0.33% | 0.63% |
| 2004 | 0.31% | 0.85% |
| 2003 | 0.18% | 1.21% |
| 2002 | 0.33% | 1.35% |
| 2001 | 0.36% | 1.76% |
| 2000 | 0.38% | 0.97% |
| 1999 | 0.18% | 0.00% |
Select Stocks to Compare
More Comparisons
Compare with similar stocks