PHM vs CUK
Comparison between PulteGroup Inc (PHM, Company) and Carnival PLC (CUK, Company).
Both PHM and CUK are from the Consumer Cyclical sector.
5-Year PerformancePHM has outperformed CUK, delivering a return of +20.7% compared to +3.6%
PHM vs CUK - Performance Comparison
Key Characteristics
Financial metrics and valuation ratios
PHM vs CUK - Historical Returns
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
PHM vs CUK - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
| Year | PHM | CUK |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | +10.80% | -10.04% |
| 2025 | +9.82% | +34.68% |
| 2024 | +7.98% | +42.74% |
| 2023 | +125.46% | +137.80% |
| 2022 | -17.68% | -63.28% |
| 2021 | +36.94% | +4.88% |
| 2020 | +13.00% | -60.92% |
| 2019 | +49.88% | +2.10% |
| 2018 | -21.05% | -24.95% |
| 2017 | +81.73% | +32.75% |
| 2016 | +9.17% | -6.96% |
| 2015 | -14.74% | +28.55% |
| 2014 | +8.11% | +13.27% |
| 2013 | +10.47% | +8.24% |
| 2012 | +178.53% | +20.26% |
| 2011 | -18.89% | -27.95% |
| 2010 | -26.56% | +36.99% |
| 2009 | -10.47% | +43.05% |
| 2008 | +6.27% | -44.48% |
| 2007 | -67.13% | -13.42% |
| 2006 | -19.29% | -11.34% |
| 2005 | +24.89% | -5.33% |
| 2004 | +40.78% | +53.47% |
| 2003 | +84.87% | +74.30% |
| 2002 | +8.56% | +21.44% |
| 2001 | +11.32% | +40.94% |
| 2000 | +101.03% | -8.00% |
| 1999 | +9.65% | N/A |
PHM vs CUK Drawdown Comparison
The maximum drawdown for PHM was -92.39%, occurring on Oct 3, 2011. Recovery took 3644 trading sessions.
The maximum drawdown for CUK was -91.43%, occurring on Oct 10, 2022. This drawdown has not yet recovered.
The current PHM drawdown is -10.59%. The current CUK drawdown is -58.06%.
| Rank | PHM | CUK |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | -92.39% Jul 28, 2005 - Jan 21, 2020 | -91.43% Jan 29, 2018 - Oct 10, 2022 |
| #2 | -62.09% Feb 11, 2020 - Aug 21, 2020 | -72.11% Dec 28, 2004 - Mar 27, 2015 |
| #3 | -45.40% Apr 27, 2001 - Feb 26, 2002 | -53.15% Aug 27, 2001 - Dec 26, 2001 |
| #4 | -40.98% May 10, 2021 - Apr 18, 2023 | -31.82% Feb 9, 2001 - Aug 1, 2001 |
| #5 | -38.01% Oct 18, 2024 - Apr 8, 2025 | -31.41% Nov 6, 2002 - May 28, 2003 |
| #6 | -37.85% Jun 24, 2002 - May 7, 2003 | -23.78% Oct 23, 2000 - Jan 4, 2001 |
| #7 | -31.65% Nov 16, 1999 - May 16, 2000 | -23.71% Dec 29, 2015 - Mar 10, 2017 |
| #8 | -25.43% Sep 21, 2004 - Dec 15, 2004 | -22.08% May 16, 2002 - Sep 11, 2002 |
| #9 | -25.27% Dec 5, 2000 - Apr 24, 2001 | -14.40% Feb 17, 2004 - Jun 23, 2004 |
| #10 | -20.93% Mar 5, 2004 - Aug 16, 2004 | -11.69% Aug 18, 2015 - Oct 23, 2015 |
| #11 | -19.11% Oct 9, 2000 - Nov 3, 2000 | -11.22% Sep 11, 2002 - Oct 23, 2002 |
| #12 | -18.85% Aug 8, 2023 - Nov 14, 2023 | -10.68% Apr 7, 2015 - May 19, 2015 |
| #13 | -18.38% Jun 16, 2003 - Oct 2, 2003 | -10.39% Jul 2, 2004 - Sep 16, 2004 |
| #14 | -17.87% Oct 12, 2020 - Feb 10, 2021 | -9.03% Aug 31, 2017 - Jan 12, 2018 |
| #15 | -15.44% Mar 4, 2002 - May 1, 2002 | -8.61% Jan 17, 2002 - Mar 6, 2002 |
Correlation
Correlation between PHM and CUK is -0.18 which considered as a very weak or no correlation - the stocks move independently of each other.
Dividend Comparison (1999 - 2026)
PHM vs CUK dividend yield comparison.
| Year | PHM | CUK |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 0.40% | 0.55% |
| 2025 | 0.78% | 0.00% |
| 2024 | 0.75% | 0.00% |
| 2023 | 0.66% | 0.00% |
| 2022 | 1.34% | 0.00% |
| 2021 | 1.00% | 0.00% |
| 2020 | 1.16% | 2.67% |
| 2019 | 1.16% | 4.15% |
| 2018 | 1.46% | 4.00% |
| 2017 | 1.08% | 2.41% |
| 2016 | 1.96% | 2.64% |
| 2015 | 1.85% | 1.93% |
| 2014 | 1.07% | 2.22% |
| 2013 | 0.74% | 2.41% |
| 2012 | 0.00% | 3.87% |
| 2011 | 0.00% | 3.04% |
| 2010 | 0.00% | 0.86% |
| 2008 | 1.46% | 7.06% |
| 2007 | 1.52% | 3.13% |
| 2006 | 0.48% | 2.04% |
| 2005 | 0.33% | 1.41% |
| 2004 | 0.31% | 0.86% |
| 2003 | 0.18% | 1.04% |
| 2002 | 0.33% | 1.44% |
| 2001 | 0.36% | 1.73% |
| 2000 | 0.38% | 0.00% |
| 1999 | 0.18% | 0.00% |
Select Stocks to Compare
More Comparisons
Compare with similar stocks