PGC vs DQ

Comparison between Peapack-Gladstone Financial Corp (PGC, Company) and Daqo New Energy Corp (DQ, Company).

PGC is from the Financial Services sector, while DQ is from the Technology sector.

5-Year PerformancePGC has outperformed DQ, delivering a return of +9.3% compared to -27.7%

PGC vs DQ - Performance Comparison

Log

Key Characteristics

Financial metrics and valuation ratios

Metric	PGC(COMPANY)	DQ(COMPANY)
Market Cap	$812M	$812M
Max Drawdown	71.98%	94.98%
Sharpe Ratio	1.87	-0.84
5Y Beta	0.96	1.12
Industry	Banks - Regional	Semiconductor Equipment & Materials
P/E Ratio	18.41	-4.76
Forward P/E	9.60	21.37
PEG Ratio	0.49	0.17
Dividend Yield	0.44%	N/A
5Y Dividends CAGR	4.56%	N/A
5Y EPS CAGR	4.45%	N/A
Debt to Equity	9.13%	0.00%
Free Cash Flow Yield	7.83%	-15.18%
P/S Ratio	2.97	1.43
P/B Ratio	1.22	0.18

Market Cap

PGC

$812M

Winner

$812M

Max Drawdown

Winner

PGC

71.98%

94.98%

Sharpe Ratio

Winner

PGC

1.87

-0.84

5Y Beta

Winner

PGC

0.96

1.12

Industry

PGC

Banks - Regional

Semiconductor Equipment & Materials

P/E Ratio

PGC

18.41

Winner

-4.76

Forward P/E

Winner

PGC

9.60

21.37

PEG Ratio

PGC

0.49

Winner

0.17

Dividend Yield

PGC

0.44%

N/A

5Y Dividends CAGR

PGC

4.56%

N/A

5Y EPS CAGR

PGC

4.45%

N/A

Debt to Equity

PGC

9.13%

Winner

0.00%

Free Cash Flow Yield

Winner

PGC

7.83%

-15.18%

P/S Ratio

PGC

2.97

Winner

1.43

P/B Ratio

PGC

1.22

Winner

0.18

PGC vs DQ - Historical Returns

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

Period	PGC	DQ
1 month	+0.22%	-13.00%
3 months	+17.73%	-49.37%
6 months	+57.37%	-57.17%
1 year	+80.40%	-53.53%
5 years(CAGR)	+9.28%	-27.73%
10 years(CAGR)	+9.50%	+10.12%
Max(CAGR)	+5.34%	+0.81%

Winner

PGC

+0.22%

-13.00%

Winner

PGC

+17.73%

-49.37%

Winner

PGC

+57.37%

-57.17%

Winner

PGC

+80.40%

-53.53%

5Y(CAGR)

Winner

PGC

+9.28%

-27.73%

10Y(CAGR)

PGC

+9.50%

Winner

+10.12%

Max(CAGR)

Winner

PGC

+5.34%

+0.81%

PGC vs DQ - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

Year	PGC	DQ
2026	+67.34%	-60.76%
2025	-10.01%	+45.75%
2024	+8.91%	-22.80%
2023	-17.36%	-33.42%
2022	+4.45%	-8.01%
2021	+55.50%	-35.31%
2020	-25.34%	+421.64%
2019	+21.24%	+112.89%
2018	-28.14%	-62.60%
2017	+13.56%	+199.45%
2016	+56.03%	+16.27%
2015	+12.52%	-34.63%
2014	-0.76%	-30.68%
2013	+31.70%	+337.35%
2012	+33.21%	-13.48%
2011	-19.21%	-83.80%
2010	-1.27%	-0.88%
2009	-47.16%	N/A
2008	+10.68%	N/A
2007	-8.33%	N/A
2006	+3.51%	N/A
2005	-9.21%	N/A
2004	+14.55%	N/A
2003	+5.68%	N/A
2002	+87.73%	N/A
2001	-7.16%	N/A
2000	+4.41%	N/A
1999	-5.76%	N/A

PGC vs DQ Drawdown Comparison

The maximum drawdown for PGC was -70.40%, occurring on Sep 22, 2011. Recovery took 2078 trading sessions.

The maximum drawdown for DQ was -94.98%, occurring on Sep 21, 2012. Recovery took 2271 trading sessions.

The current PGC drawdown is -4.03%. The current DQ drawdown is -90.62%.

Rank	PGC	DQ
#1	-70.40% Sep 19, 2008 - Dec 20, 2016	-94.98% Feb 2, 2011 - Feb 12, 2020
#2	-65.20% Jan 12, 2018 - Jan 6, 2022	-90.63% Feb 9, 2021 - Jul 13, 2026
#3	-50.02% Nov 10, 2022 - Apr 27, 2026	-44.84% Feb 19, 2020 - Jul 1, 2020
#4	-32.73% Dec 20, 2002 - Jan 26, 2004	-31.62% Nov 11, 2010 - Feb 2, 2011
#5	-31.14% Apr 16, 2007 - Aug 13, 2008	-28.14% Oct 20, 2020 - Dec 15, 2020
#6	-27.23% Mar 3, 2022 - Oct 28, 2022	-27.62% Aug 25, 2020 - Sep 30, 2020
#7	-25.96% Nov 29, 2004 - Apr 9, 2007	-17.59% Oct 15, 2010 - Nov 4, 2010
#8	-23.39% Jan 29, 2001 - Mar 8, 2002	-15.59% Jan 12, 2021 - Jan 21, 2021
#9	-22.87% Nov 23, 1999 - Jan 25, 2001	-15.47% Dec 22, 2020 - Jan 5, 2021
#10	-19.86% Apr 5, 2004 - Nov 4, 2004	-15.23% Jan 27, 2021 - Feb 2, 2021
#11	-18.81% Aug 13, 2008 - Sep 18, 2008	-10.04% Aug 5, 2020 - Aug 19, 2020
#12	-13.45% Oct 3, 2002 - Nov 5, 2002	-9.84% Jul 6, 2020 - Jul 20, 2020
#13	-13.04% Feb 17, 2017 - Apr 26, 2017	-9.21% Feb 3, 2021 - Feb 9, 2021
#14	-11.19% Jan 26, 2004 - Apr 2, 2004	-8.57% Oct 14, 2020 - Oct 20, 2020
#15	-11.11% Apr 24, 2002 - Jul 9, 2002	-6.16% Jul 20, 2020 - Aug 3, 2020