PEO vs QQH

Comparison between Adams Natural Resources Fund Inc (PEO, ETF) and HCM DEFENDER 100 INDEX ETF (QQH, ETF).

5-Year PerformancePEO has outperformed QQH, delivering a return of +18.2% compared to +13.3%

PEO vs QQH - Performance Comparison

Log

Key Characteristics

Financial metrics and valuation ratios

Metric	PEO(ETF)	QQH(ETF)
Net Assets	$797M	$799M
Expense Ratio	N/A	0.98%
Max Drawdown	86.24%	41.87%
Sharpe Ratio	1.49	1.17
5Y Beta	0.53	1.15
P/E Ratio	N/A	34.80
Forward P/E	N/A	25.46
PEG Ratio	N/A	0.35
5Y Dividends CAGR	28.22%	N/A
5Y EPS CAGR	N/A	31.42%
Debt to Equity	N/A	35.61%
P/S Ratio	N/A	6.03
P/B Ratio	N/A	9.43

Net Assets

PEO

$797M

Winner

QQH

$799M

Expense Ratio

PEO

N/A

QQH

0.98%

Max Drawdown

PEO

86.24%

Winner

QQH

41.87%

Sharpe Ratio

Winner

PEO

1.49

QQH

1.17

5Y Beta

Winner

PEO

0.53

QQH

1.15

P/E Ratio

PEO

N/A

QQH

34.80

Forward P/E

PEO

N/A

QQH

25.46

PEG Ratio

PEO

N/A

QQH

0.35

5Y Dividends CAGR

PEO

28.22%

QQH

N/A

5Y EPS CAGR

PEO

N/A

QQH

31.42%

Debt to Equity

PEO

N/A

QQH

35.61%

P/S Ratio

PEO

N/A

QQH

6.03

P/B Ratio

PEO

N/A

QQH

9.43

PEO vs QQH - Historical Returns

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

Period	PEO	QQH
1 month	-0.96%	+0.75%
3 months	-1.31%	+14.51%
6 months	+23.81%	+8.98%
1 year	+31.88%	+30.74%
5 years(CAGR)	+18.25%	+13.32%
10 years(CAGR)	+10.18%	N/A
Max(CAGR)	+7.83%	+19.97%

PEO

-0.96%

Winner

QQH

+0.75%

PEO

-1.31%

Winner

QQH

+14.51%

Winner

PEO

+23.81%

QQH

+8.98%

Winner

PEO

+31.88%

QQH

+30.74%

5Y(CAGR)

Winner

PEO

+18.25%

QQH

+13.32%

10Y(CAGR)

PEO

+10.18%

QQH

N/A

Max(CAGR)

PEO

+7.83%

Winner

QQH

+19.97%

PEO vs QQH - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

Year	PEO	QQH
2026	+22.01%	+9.30%
2025	+8.90%	+16.29%
2024	+11.91%	+37.02%
2023	+3.91%	+48.35%
2022	+39.27%	-40.58%
2021	+53.52%	+40.68%
2020	-27.08%	+39.19%
2019	+18.97%	+15.13%
2018	-24.05%	N/A
2017	+3.47%	N/A
2016	+21.94%	N/A
2015	-20.12%	N/A
2014	-5.87%	N/A
2013	+19.97%	N/A
2012	+1.70%	N/A
2011	-2.82%	N/A
2010	+16.74%	N/A
2009	+22.89%	N/A
2008	-42.98%	N/A
2007	+32.34%	N/A
2006	+12.95%	N/A
2005	+34.04%	N/A
2004	+15.02%	N/A
2003	+29.79%	N/A
2002	-12.73%	N/A
2001	-9.45%	N/A
2000	+35.62%	N/A
1999	-2.66%	N/A

PEO vs QQH Drawdown Comparison

The maximum drawdown for PEO was -71.90%, occurring on Mar 18, 2020. Recovery took 1896 trading sessions.

The maximum drawdown for QQH was -41.87%, occurring on Dec 28, 2022. Recovery took 612 trading sessions.

The current PEO drawdown is -7.08%. The current QQH drawdown is -5.87%.

Rank	PEO	QQH
#1	-71.90% Jul 24, 2014 - Feb 2, 2022	-41.87% Dec 28, 2021 - Jun 5, 2024
#2	-59.45% May 20, 2008 - Apr 3, 2014	-28.74% Feb 19, 2020 - Jul 20, 2020
#3	-40.24% May 22, 2001 - Oct 6, 2004	-24.84% Dec 16, 2024 - Aug 12, 2025
#4	-24.30% Jun 8, 2022 - Jan 26, 2023	-17.85% Sep 2, 2020 - Dec 7, 2020
#5	-18.84% Nov 22, 2024 - Dec 1, 2025	-16.18% Oct 29, 2025 - May 8, 2026
#6	-16.37% Jan 26, 2023 - Aug 9, 2023	-15.69% Jul 10, 2024 - Nov 7, 2024
#7	-15.32% May 10, 2006 - Aug 9, 2006	-14.63% Feb 12, 2021 - Apr 9, 2021
#8	-15.27% Dec 26, 2007 - Apr 15, 2008	-10.73% Sep 7, 2021 - Oct 28, 2021
#9	-15.23% Sep 19, 2005 - Dec 12, 2005	-10.19% Jun 2, 2026 - Jun 10, 2026
#10	-14.93% Nov 17, 1999 - Mar 31, 2000	-10.13% Apr 16, 2021 - Jun 14, 2021
#11	-13.35% Jul 19, 2007 - Sep 21, 2007	-8.12% Nov 19, 2021 - Dec 28, 2021
#12	-12.60% Aug 9, 2006 - Nov 9, 2006	-5.76% Jul 20, 2020 - Aug 3, 2020
#13	-12.23% Mar 4, 2005 - Jun 20, 2005	-5.50% Jan 25, 2021 - Feb 4, 2021
#14	-11.80% Sep 5, 2023 - Mar 13, 2024	-4.96% Oct 8, 2025 - Oct 24, 2025
#15	-11.79% Oct 12, 2000 - Jan 25, 2001	-4.75% Aug 6, 2020 - Aug 17, 2020

Correlation

Correlation between PEO and QQH is 0.81 which considered as a strong positive correlation - the stocks tend to move together.

0.81

-101

Dividend Comparison (2000 - 2026)

PEO vs QQH dividend yield comparison.

Year	PEO	QQH
2026	3.91%	0.00%
2025	9.43%	0.21%
2024	8.14%	0.24%
2023	6.54%	0.27%
2022	7.48%	0.00%
2021	5.51%	0.00%
2020	6.42%	0.00%
2019	6.68%	0.21%
2018	5.63%	0.00%
2017	5.95%	0.00%
2016	5.65%	0.00%
2015	7.78%	0.00%
2014	7.84%	0.00%
2013	6.76%	0.00%
2012	6.69%	0.00%
2011	8.21%	0.00%
2010	4.70%	0.00%
2009	5.90%	0.00%
2008	15.20%	0.00%
2007	11.07%	0.00%
2006	11.06%	0.00%
2005	5.50%	0.00%
2004	5.12%	0.00%
2003	5.01%	0.00%
2002	5.79%	0.00%
2001	6.18%	0.00%
2000	5.43%	0.00%