PDT vs FCG
Comparison between John Hancock Premium Dividend Fund (PDT, ETF) and FIRST TRUST NATURAL GAS ETF (FCG, ETF).
5-Year PerformanceFCG has outperformed PDT, delivering a return of +15.4% compared to +2.6%
PDT vs FCG - Performance Comparison
Key Characteristics
Financial metrics and valuation ratios
PDT vs FCG - Historical Returns
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
PDT vs FCG - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
| Year | PDT | FCG |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | +3.70% | +13.31% |
| 2025 | +7.88% | -4.15% |
| 2024 | +28.48% | +3.63% |
| 2023 | -10.25% | +8.47% |
| 2022 | -16.41% | +41.72% |
| 2021 | +27.89% | +95.33% |
| 2020 | -14.36% | -22.08% |
| 2019 | +38.87% | -18.11% |
| 2018 | -11.60% | -36.53% |
| 2017 | +20.46% | -11.75% |
| 2016 | +25.22% | +17.98% |
| 2015 | +7.79% | -60.10% |
| 2014 | +26.06% | -41.72% |
| 2013 | -6.71% | +22.74% |
| 2012 | +8.08% | -16.57% |
| 2011 | +25.48% | -8.25% |
| 2010 | +25.49% | +6.38% |
| 2009 | +47.06% | +40.30% |
| 2008 | -21.88% | -48.08% |
| 2007 | -7.93% | +12.69% |
| 2006 | +19.70% | N/A |
| 2005 | -7.29% | N/A |
| 2004 | +9.54% | N/A |
| 2003 | +25.14% | N/A |
| 2002 | -2.21% | N/A |
| 2001 | +12.40% | N/A |
| 2000 | +19.49% | N/A |
| 1999 | -10.19% | N/A |
PDT vs FCG Drawdown Comparison
The maximum drawdown for PDT was -62.37%, occurring on Mar 23, 2020. Recovery took 325 trading sessions.
The maximum drawdown for FCG was -97.36%, occurring on Mar 23, 2020. This drawdown has not yet recovered.
The current PDT drawdown is -3.94%. The current FCG drawdown is -78.06%.
| Rank | PDT | FCG |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | -62.37% Feb 20, 2020 - Jun 4, 2021 | -97.36% Jun 18, 2008 - Mar 23, 2020 |
| #2 | -52.75% May 21, 2007 - Sep 30, 2009 | -16.09% Jun 15, 2007 - Oct 12, 2007 |
| #3 | -40.45% Nov 17, 2021 - May 30, 2025 | -11.85% Jan 14, 2008 - Feb 20, 2008 |
| #4 | -21.71% Sep 7, 2016 - Apr 18, 2017 | -11.29% Nov 6, 2007 - Jan 14, 2008 |
| #5 | -20.67% Mar 29, 2004 - Oct 18, 2004 | -11.01% Feb 28, 2008 - Apr 7, 2008 |
| #6 | -19.39% May 8, 2013 - Apr 30, 2014 | -5.88% May 20, 2008 - Jun 9, 2008 |
| #7 | -18.63% Jul 6, 2018 - Feb 8, 2019 | -5.70% Apr 21, 2008 - May 6, 2008 |
| #8 | -17.19% Nov 18, 1999 - Sep 1, 2000 | -4.23% Oct 18, 2007 - Oct 26, 2007 |
| #9 | -17.12% Jun 3, 2002 - Jan 8, 2003 | -4.03% Jun 4, 2007 - Jun 15, 2007 |
| #10 | -16.62% Jul 12, 2005 - Dec 15, 2006 | -2.43% Jun 9, 2008 - Jun 17, 2008 |
| #11 | -15.58% Jun 29, 2012 - Apr 23, 2013 | -2.25% Feb 20, 2008 - Feb 25, 2008 |
| #12 | -14.14% Jul 14, 2011 - Nov 17, 2011 | -2.23% May 22, 2007 - May 30, 2007 |
| #13 | -13.31% Dec 22, 2017 - Jul 5, 2018 | -1.59% Oct 31, 2007 - Nov 6, 2007 |
| #14 | -11.31% Jul 3, 2003 - Oct 31, 2003 | -1.38% Oct 29, 2007 - Oct 31, 2007 |
| #15 | -10.31% May 3, 2010 - Jul 12, 2010 | -1.37% Apr 16, 2008 - Apr 18, 2008 |
Correlation
Correlation between PDT and FCG is -0.78 which considered as a strong negative correlation - the stocks tend to move in opposite directions.
Dividend Comparison (2000 - 2026)
PDT vs FCG dividend yield comparison.
| Year | PDT | FCG |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 3.89% | 0.54% |
| 2025 | 7.80% | 2.86% |
| 2024 | 7.77% | 2.76% |
| 2023 | 10.14% | 3.25% |
| 2022 | 9.04% | 3.04% |
| 2021 | 6.42% | 1.73% |
| 2020 | 8.43% | 3.82% |
| 2019 | 6.70% | 2.87% |
| 2018 | 8.69% | 1.46% |
| 2017 | 9.94% | 1.56% |
| 2016 | 9.15% | 1.36% |
| 2015 | 7.88% | 0.96% |
| 2014 | 6.66% | 0.27% |
| 2013 | 10.82% | 0.07% |
| 2012 | 6.68% | 0.08% |
| 2011 | 7.30% | 0.08% |
| 2010 | 7.58% | 0.05% |
| 2009 | 7.57% | 0.08% |
| 2008 | 9.95% | 0.25% |
| 2007 | 6.14% | 0.02% |
| 2006 | 5.49% | 0.00% |
| 2005 | 7.45% | 0.00% |
| 2004 | 6.78% | 0.00% |
| 2003 | 7.16% | 0.00% |
| 2002 | 10.52% | 0.00% |
| 2001 | 7.06% | 0.00% |
| 2000 | 3.08% | 0.00% |
Select Stocks to Compare
More Comparisons
Compare with similar stocks