StockComparison Logo
vs

PDT vs FCG

Comparison between John Hancock Premium Dividend Fund (PDT, ETF) and FIRST TRUST NATURAL GAS ETF (FCG, ETF).

5-Year PerformanceFCG has outperformed PDT, delivering a return of +15.4% compared to +2.6%

PDT vs FCG - Performance Comparison

Key Characteristics

Financial metrics and valuation ratios

Net Assets
PDT
$712M
Winner
FCG
$714M
Expense Ratio
PDT
N/A
FCG
0.59%
Max Drawdown
Winner
PDT
62.63%
FCG
97.57%
Sharpe Ratio
PDT
0.30
Winner
FCG
0.38
5Y Beta
Winner
PDT
0.42
FCG
0.71
P/E Ratio
PDT
N/A
FCG
20.60
Forward P/E
PDT
N/A
FCG
8.13
5Y Dividends CAGR
PDT
-2.13%
Winner
FCG
16.89%

PDT vs FCG - Historical Returns

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

1M
Winner
PDT
+0.72%
FCG
-13.62%
3M
Winner
PDT
-2.42%
FCG
-10.95%
6M
PDT
+4.19%
Winner
FCG
+18.01%
1Y
PDT
+6.17%
Winner
FCG
+11.23%
5Y(CAGR)
PDT
+2.56%
Winner
FCG
+15.40%
10Y(CAGR)
Winner
PDT
+6.21%
FCG
+3.60%
Max(CAGR)
Winner
PDT
+9.09%
FCG
-5.22%

PDT vs FCG - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

YearPDTFCG
2026+3.70%+13.31%
2025+7.88%-4.15%
2024+28.48%+3.63%
2023-10.25%+8.47%
2022-16.41%+41.72%
2021+27.89%+95.33%
2020-14.36%-22.08%
2019+38.87%-18.11%
2018-11.60%-36.53%
2017+20.46%-11.75%
2016+25.22%+17.98%
2015+7.79%-60.10%
2014+26.06%-41.72%
2013-6.71%+22.74%
2012+8.08%-16.57%
2011+25.48%-8.25%
2010+25.49%+6.38%
2009+47.06%+40.30%
2008-21.88%-48.08%
2007-7.93%+12.69%
2006+19.70%N/A
2005-7.29%N/A
2004+9.54%N/A
2003+25.14%N/A
2002-2.21%N/A
2001+12.40%N/A
2000+19.49%N/A
1999-10.19%N/A

PDT vs FCG Drawdown Comparison

The maximum drawdown for PDT was -62.37%, occurring on Mar 23, 2020. Recovery took 325 trading sessions.

The maximum drawdown for FCG was -97.36%, occurring on Mar 23, 2020. This drawdown has not yet recovered.

The current PDT drawdown is -3.94%. The current FCG drawdown is -78.06%.

RankPDTFCG
#1-62.37%
Feb 20, 2020 - Jun 4, 2021
-97.36%
Jun 18, 2008 - Mar 23, 2020
#2-52.75%
May 21, 2007 - Sep 30, 2009
-16.09%
Jun 15, 2007 - Oct 12, 2007
#3-40.45%
Nov 17, 2021 - May 30, 2025
-11.85%
Jan 14, 2008 - Feb 20, 2008
#4-21.71%
Sep 7, 2016 - Apr 18, 2017
-11.29%
Nov 6, 2007 - Jan 14, 2008
#5-20.67%
Mar 29, 2004 - Oct 18, 2004
-11.01%
Feb 28, 2008 - Apr 7, 2008
#6-19.39%
May 8, 2013 - Apr 30, 2014
-5.88%
May 20, 2008 - Jun 9, 2008
#7-18.63%
Jul 6, 2018 - Feb 8, 2019
-5.70%
Apr 21, 2008 - May 6, 2008
#8-17.19%
Nov 18, 1999 - Sep 1, 2000
-4.23%
Oct 18, 2007 - Oct 26, 2007
#9-17.12%
Jun 3, 2002 - Jan 8, 2003
-4.03%
Jun 4, 2007 - Jun 15, 2007
#10-16.62%
Jul 12, 2005 - Dec 15, 2006
-2.43%
Jun 9, 2008 - Jun 17, 2008
#11-15.58%
Jun 29, 2012 - Apr 23, 2013
-2.25%
Feb 20, 2008 - Feb 25, 2008
#12-14.14%
Jul 14, 2011 - Nov 17, 2011
-2.23%
May 22, 2007 - May 30, 2007
#13-13.31%
Dec 22, 2017 - Jul 5, 2018
-1.59%
Oct 31, 2007 - Nov 6, 2007
#14-11.31%
Jul 3, 2003 - Oct 31, 2003
-1.38%
Oct 29, 2007 - Oct 31, 2007
#15-10.31%
May 3, 2010 - Jul 12, 2010
-1.37%
Apr 16, 2008 - Apr 18, 2008

Correlation

Correlation between PDT and FCG is -0.78 which considered as a strong negative correlation - the stocks tend to move in opposite directions.

-0.78
-101

Dividend Comparison (2000 - 2026)

PDT vs FCG dividend yield comparison.

YearPDTFCG
20263.89%0.54%
20257.80%2.86%
20247.77%2.76%
202310.14%3.25%
20229.04%3.04%
20216.42%1.73%
20208.43%3.82%
20196.70%2.87%
20188.69%1.46%
20179.94%1.56%
20169.15%1.36%
20157.88%0.96%
20146.66%0.27%
201310.82%0.07%
20126.68%0.08%
20117.30%0.08%
20107.58%0.05%
20097.57%0.08%
20089.95%0.25%
20076.14%0.02%
20065.49%0.00%
20057.45%0.00%
20046.78%0.00%
20037.16%0.00%
200210.52%0.00%
20017.06%0.00%
20003.08%0.00%

Select Stocks to Compare