PCQ vs VNM

Comparison between Pimco California Municipal Income Fund (PCQ, ETF) and VANECK VIETNAM ETF (VNM, ETF).

5-Year PerformanceVNM has outperformed PCQ, delivering a return of -1.2% compared to -10.1%

PCQ vs VNM - Performance Comparison

Log

Key Characteristics

Financial metrics and valuation ratios

Metric	PCQ(ETF)	VNM(ETF)
Net Assets	$566M	$565M
Expense Ratio	N/A	0.66%
Max Drawdown	60.60%	69.75%
Sharpe Ratio	0.82	0.31
5Y Beta	0.14	0.77
5Y Dividends CAGR	-11.37%	-27.59%

Net Assets

Winner

PCQ

$566M

VNM

$565M

Expense Ratio

PCQ

N/A

VNM

0.66%

Max Drawdown

Winner

PCQ

60.60%

VNM

69.75%

Sharpe Ratio

Winner

PCQ

0.82

VNM

0.31

5Y Beta

Winner

PCQ

0.14

VNM

0.77

5Y Dividends CAGR

Winner

PCQ

-11.37%

VNM

-27.59%

PCQ vs VNM - Historical Returns

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

Period	PCQ	VNM
1 month	-0.73%	-9.22%
3 months	+1.34%	-10.23%
6 months	+1.19%	-12.69%
1 year	+10.33%	+10.52%
5 years(CAGR)	-10.08%	-1.16%
10 years(CAGR)	-1.80%	+2.48%
Max(CAGR)	+3.73%	-0.95%

Winner

PCQ

-0.73%

VNM

-9.22%

Winner

PCQ

+1.34%

VNM

-10.23%

Winner

PCQ

+1.19%

VNM

-12.69%

PCQ

+10.33%

Winner

VNM

+10.52%

5Y(CAGR)

PCQ

-10.08%

Winner

VNM

-1.16%

10Y(CAGR)

PCQ

-1.80%

Winner

VNM

+2.48%

Max(CAGR)

Winner

PCQ

+3.73%

VNM

-0.95%

PCQ vs VNM - Annual Returns (2001 - 2026)

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

Year	PCQ	VNM
2026	+2.99%	-11.41%
2025	+0.17%	+65.39%
2024	+1.28%	-9.75%
2023	-36.42%	+10.66%
2022	-15.26%	-43.81%
2021	+7.87%	+21.63%
2020	-6.19%	+8.01%
2019	+26.15%	+8.14%
2018	-1.10%	-17.39%
2017	+16.44%	+36.46%
2016	+5.62%	-10.75%
2015	+6.94%	-19.15%
2014	+26.59%	+6.30%
2013	-14.10%	+2.36%
2012	+25.62%	+24.62%
2011	+18.97%	-46.32%
2010	+6.14%	-1.77%
2009	+45.10%	-1.90%
2008	-41.29%	N/A
2007	-3.73%	N/A
2006	+16.83%	N/A
2005	+24.28%	N/A
2004	+8.38%	N/A
2003	+0.07%	N/A
2002	+2.59%	N/A
2001	+0.78%	N/A

PCQ vs VNM Drawdown Comparison

The maximum drawdown for PCQ was -56.28%, occurring on Dec 16, 2008. Recovery took 839 trading sessions.

The maximum drawdown for VNM was -63.25%, occurring on Mar 23, 2020. This drawdown has not yet recovered.

The current PCQ drawdown is -45.05%. The current VNM drawdown is -30.97%.

Rank	PCQ	VNM
#1	-56.28% May 11, 2007 - Sep 9, 2010	-63.25% Oct 22, 2009 - Mar 23, 2020
#2	-54.86% Nov 12, 2021 - Oct 6, 2023	-6.44% Aug 21, 2009 - Sep 9, 2009
#3	-37.82% Dec 9, 2019 - Jul 15, 2021	-5.51% Sep 21, 2009 - Oct 9, 2009
#4	-22.43% Jan 23, 2013 - Nov 20, 2014	-3.04% Aug 14, 2009 - Aug 19, 2009
#5	-17.69% Oct 15, 2010 - Sep 29, 2011	-2.23% Oct 15, 2009 - Oct 19, 2009
#6	-17.09% Dec 11, 2017 - Jul 9, 2018	-1.78% Oct 19, 2009 - Oct 22, 2009
#7	-14.13% Aug 13, 2018 - Jan 28, 2019	-0.87% Sep 16, 2009 - Sep 21, 2009
#8	-13.13% Sep 8, 2016 - May 8, 2017	-0.82% Oct 12, 2009 - Oct 14, 2009
#9	-12.06% Jun 13, 2003 - Apr 1, 2004	N/A
#10	-11.35% Feb 2, 2015 - Oct 20, 2015	N/A
#11	-10.17% Jul 11, 2012 - Nov 28, 2012	N/A
#12	-9.02% Jan 30, 2012 - Apr 24, 2012	N/A
#13	-8.76% Apr 1, 2004 - Aug 6, 2004	N/A
#14	-8.05% Sep 13, 2002 - May 22, 2003	N/A
#15	-7.19% Aug 16, 2001 - Aug 6, 2002	N/A

Correlation

Correlation between PCQ and VNM is -0.19 which considered as a very weak or no correlation - the stocks move independently of each other.

-0.19

-101

Dividend Comparison (2001 - 2026)

PCQ vs VNM dividend yield comparison.

Year	PCQ	VNM
2026	2.88%	0.00%
2025	4.95%	0.20%
2024	4.78%	0.00%
2023	4.64%	5.21%
2022	5.29%	0.96%
2021	4.20%	0.49%
2020	4.39%	0.40%
2019	4.65%	0.76%
2018	5.72%	0.83%
2017	5.35%	1.14%
2016	5.89%	2.44%
2015	5.89%	3.69%
2014	5.90%	2.65%
2013	7.10%	3.19%
2012	5.80%	2.04%
2011	6.87%	1.12%
2010	7.45%	1.31%
2009	7.46%	0.14%
2008	10.68%	0.00%
2007	5.95%	0.00%
2006	5.25%	0.00%
2005	5.83%	0.00%
2004	6.83%	0.00%
2003	6.90%	0.00%
2002	6.45%	0.00%
2001	2.53%	0.00%