PCG vs TRI
Comparison between PG&E Corp (PCG, Company) and Thomson-Reuters Corp (TRI, Company).
PCG is from the Utilities sector, while TRI is from the Industrials sector.
5-Year PerformancePCG has outperformed TRI, delivering a return of +10.8% compared to -1.1%
PCG vs TRI - Performance Comparison
Key Characteristics
Financial metrics and valuation ratios
PCG vs TRI - Historical Returns
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
PCG vs TRI - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
| Year | PCG | TRI |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | +5.46% | -30.89% |
| 2025 | -19.04% | -17.06% |
| 2024 | +12.13% | +12.82% |
| 2023 | +15.05% | +28.64% |
| 2022 | +33.17% | -0.97% |
| 2021 | -0.57% | +51.02% |
| 2020 | +14.84% | +15.80% |
| 2019 | -54.33% | +53.97% |
| 2018 | -46.62% | +14.09% |
| 2017 | -24.01% | +2.50% |
| 2016 | +18.46% | +22.07% |
| 2015 | +3.27% | -2.07% |
| 2014 | +39.50% | +13.45% |
| 2013 | +2.92% | +33.37% |
| 2012 | +2.72% | +12.37% |
| 2011 | -9.20% | -27.57% |
| 2010 | +11.98% | +17.92% |
| 2009 | +19.88% | +16.31% |
| 2008 | -6.76% | -26.04% |
| 2007 | -5.97% | -0.57% |
| 2006 | +30.35% | +22.33% |
| 2005 | +16.23% | +0.75% |
| 2004 | +22.22% | -2.37% |
| 2003 | +90.08% | +37.12% |
| 2002 | -28.25% | -12.38% |
| 2001 | -1.64% | N/A |
| 2000 | +6.09% | N/A |
| 1999 | -10.55% | N/A |
PCG vs TRI Drawdown Comparison
The maximum drawdown for PCG was -94.65%, occurring on Oct 28, 2019. This drawdown has not yet recovered.
The maximum drawdown for TRI was -62.55%, occurring on May 14, 2026. This drawdown has not yet recovered.
The current PCG drawdown is -75.56%. The current TRI drawdown is -58.92%.
| Rank | PCG | TRI |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | -94.65% Sep 11, 2017 - Oct 28, 2019 | -62.55% Jul 14, 2025 - May 14, 2026 |
| #2 | -77.66% Sep 11, 2000 - Oct 5, 2004 | -56.41% Oct 31, 2007 - Nov 6, 2013 |
| #3 | -39.83% Apr 25, 2007 - Aug 10, 2010 | -35.36% Feb 19, 2020 - Oct 5, 2020 |
| #4 | -20.92% Nov 5, 2010 - Jun 29, 2012 | -26.73% Jun 28, 2002 - May 20, 2003 |
| #5 | -19.44% Jan 29, 2015 - Feb 25, 2016 | -24.61% Nov 19, 2021 - Feb 13, 2023 |
| #6 | -16.06% Nov 5, 1999 - Apr 12, 2000 | -20.38% Oct 17, 2017 - Oct 3, 2018 |
| #7 | -15.56% Apr 30, 2013 - Jun 5, 2014 | -18.30% Jan 2, 2004 - Nov 16, 2004 |
| #8 | -12.91% Oct 3, 2005 - Mar 14, 2006 | -17.36% Oct 22, 2015 - Apr 26, 2016 |
| #9 | -12.88% Aug 6, 2012 - Apr 3, 2013 | -14.34% Jun 27, 2023 - Nov 17, 2023 |
| #10 | -10.54% Jul 6, 2016 - Feb 21, 2017 | -13.21% Feb 17, 2005 - Aug 10, 2005 |
| #11 | -10.45% Jun 30, 2014 - Sep 5, 2014 | -11.96% May 24, 2024 - Feb 6, 2025 |
| #12 | -10.21% Apr 26, 2000 - Aug 2, 2000 | -11.63% Nov 14, 2013 - Jul 9, 2014 |
| #13 | -8.35% Sep 9, 2010 - Oct 29, 2010 | -11.24% Sep 19, 2005 - Feb 15, 2006 |
| #14 | -7.32% Nov 24, 2004 - Jan 24, 2005 | -11.20% Apr 15, 2015 - Oct 12, 2015 |
| #15 | -7.05% Sep 5, 2014 - Oct 29, 2014 | -10.65% Jul 17, 2007 - Oct 5, 2007 |
Correlation
Correlation between PCG and TRI is -0.41 which considered as a weak negative correlation - the stocks show a slight tendency to move in opposite directions.
Dividend Comparison (1999 - 2026)
PCG vs TRI dividend yield comparison.
| Year | PCG | TRI |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 0.29% | 3.20% |
| 2025 | 0.78% | 1.80% |
| 2024 | 0.27% | 1.35% |
| 2023 | 0.06% | 4.68% |
| 2022 | 0.00% | 1.56% |
| 2021 | 0.00% | 1.76% |
| 2020 | 0.00% | 1.86% |
| 2019 | 0.00% | 2.01% |
| 2018 | 0.00% | 2.87% |
| 2017 | 3.46% | 3.17% |
| 2016 | 3.17% | 3.11% |
| 2015 | 3.42% | 3.54% |
| 2014 | 3.42% | 4.51% |
| 2013 | 4.52% | 3.44% |
| 2012 | 4.53% | 4.41% |
| 2011 | 4.42% | 4.65% |
| 2010 | 3.80% | 3.11% |
| 2009 | 3.76% | 3.47% |
| 2008 | 4.03% | 2.77% |
| 2007 | 3.34% | 1.80% |
| 2006 | 2.79% | 2.12% |
| 2005 | 3.31% | 2.28% |
| 2004 | 0.00% | 2.14% |
| 2003 | 0.00% | 3.18% |
| 2002 | 0.36% | 1.33% |
| 2000 | 6.00% | 0.00% |
| 1999 | 1.46% | 0.00% |
Select Stocks to Compare
More Comparisons
Compare with similar stocks