PBI vs TY-P
Comparison between Pitney Bowes Inc (PBI, Company) and Tri-Continental Corp (TY-P, Company).
5-Year PerformancePBI has outperformed TY-P, delivering a return of +18.1% compared to -0.9%
PBI vs TY-P - Performance Comparison
Key Characteristics
Financial metrics and valuation ratios
PBI vs TY-P - Historical Returns
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
PBI vs TY-P - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
| Year | PBI | TY-P |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | +70.10% | -3.33% |
| 2025 | +50.88% | +1.16% |
| 2024 | +72.58% | +1.89% |
| 2023 | +15.45% | +3.79% |
| 2022 | -40.76% | -17.04% |
| 2021 | +7.39% | +5.88% |
| 2020 | +63.83% | +8.50% |
| 2019 | -31.42% | +6.95% |
| 2018 | -43.66% | +6.94% |
| 2017 | -25.14% | +9.13% |
| 2016 | -22.16% | -0.16% |
| 2015 | -12.32% | +4.38% |
| 2014 | +7.06% | +1.95% |
| 2013 | +128.78% | N/A |
| 2012 | -36.85% | N/A |
| 2011 | -17.99% | N/A |
| 2010 | +12.59% | N/A |
| 2009 | -8.23% | N/A |
| 2008 | -29.45% | N/A |
| 2007 | -15.47% | N/A |
| 2006 | +10.12% | N/A |
| 2005 | -5.13% | N/A |
| 2004 | +17.62% | N/A |
| 2003 | +26.07% | N/A |
| 2002 | -12.03% | N/A |
| 2001 | +21.50% | N/A |
| 2000 | -27.99% | N/A |
| 1999 | +3.89% | N/A |
PBI vs TY-P Drawdown Comparison
The maximum drawdown for PBI was -92.13%, occurring on Apr 3, 2020. This drawdown has not yet recovered.
The maximum drawdown for TY-P was -23.31%, occurring on Nov 3, 2022. This drawdown has not yet recovered.
The current PBI drawdown is -5.23%. The current TY-P drawdown is -11.62%.
| Rank | PBI | TY-P |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | -92.13% Apr 25, 2007 - Apr 3, 2020 | -23.31% Dec 30, 2021 - Nov 3, 2022 |
| #2 | -51.83% Mar 1, 2000 - Dec 6, 2004 | -9.94% Jul 27, 2016 - Jul 19, 2017 |
| #3 | -16.69% Nov 16, 1999 - Jan 13, 2000 | -7.54% Apr 6, 2015 - Feb 8, 2016 |
| #4 | -13.43% Jan 13, 2000 - Feb 3, 2000 | -6.55% Sep 19, 2017 - Jun 7, 2018 |
| #5 | -12.64% Feb 11, 2005 - Oct 4, 2006 | -4.97% Jan 5, 2021 - Jun 17, 2021 |
| #6 | -8.08% Feb 18, 2000 - Mar 1, 2000 | -4.52% Jan 26, 2015 - Feb 18, 2015 |
| #7 | -7.36% Dec 28, 2004 - Feb 7, 2005 | -4.50% Mar 2, 2020 - Apr 2, 2020 |
| #8 | -7.06% Feb 3, 2000 - Feb 17, 2000 | -4.15% Jan 2, 2019 - May 21, 2019 |
| #9 | -6.50% Feb 26, 2007 - Apr 20, 2007 | -3.96% Dec 1, 2014 - Jan 21, 2015 |
| #10 | -4.68% Nov 1, 1999 - Nov 10, 1999 | -3.93% Apr 2, 2020 - May 22, 2020 |
| #11 | -4.07% Nov 16, 2006 - Jan 10, 2007 | -3.44% Nov 2, 2021 - Dec 30, 2021 |
| #12 | -1.74% Nov 12, 1999 - Nov 16, 1999 | -3.24% Aug 12, 2020 - Nov 30, 2020 |
| #13 | -1.70% Dec 6, 2004 - Dec 17, 2004 | -2.91% Sep 18, 2018 - Nov 8, 2018 |
| #14 | -1.57% Oct 18, 2006 - Nov 6, 2006 | -2.72% Mar 29, 2016 - Jun 2, 2016 |
| #15 | -1.47% Jan 16, 2007 - Feb 6, 2007 | -2.71% Mar 6, 2015 - Apr 2, 2015 |
Correlation
Correlation between PBI and TY-P is -0.49 which considered as a weak negative correlation - the stocks show a slight tendency to move in opposite directions.
Dividend Comparison (1999 - 2026)
PBI vs TY-P dividend yield comparison.
| Year | PBI | TY-P |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 1.10% | 1.49% |
| 2025 | 2.84% | 5.70% |
| 2024 | 2.76% | 5.59% |
| 2023 | 4.55% | 5.43% |
| 2022 | 5.26% | 5.43% |
| 2021 | 3.02% | 4.32% |
| 2020 | 3.25% | 4.38% |
| 2019 | 4.96% | 4.56% |
| 2018 | 12.69% | 3.57% |
| 2017 | 6.71% | 4.96% |
| 2016 | 4.94% | 5.16% |
| 2015 | 3.63% | 0.00% |
| 2014 | 3.08% | 0.00% |
| 2013 | 4.02% | 0.00% |
| 2012 | 14.10% | 0.00% |
| 2011 | 7.98% | 0.00% |
| 2010 | 6.04% | 0.00% |
| 2009 | 6.33% | 0.00% |
| 2008 | 5.49% | 0.00% |
| 2007 | 3.47% | 0.00% |
| 2006 | 2.77% | 0.00% |
| 2005 | 2.93% | 0.00% |
| 2004 | 2.64% | 0.00% |
| 2003 | 2.95% | 0.00% |
| 2002 | 3.61% | 0.00% |
| 2001 | 5.67% | 0.00% |
| 2000 | 3.44% | 0.00% |
| 1999 | 0.53% | 0.00% |
Select Stocks to Compare
More Comparisons
Compare with similar stocks