StockComparison Logo
vs

PAR vs GOOD

Comparison between Par Technology Corp (PAR, Company) and Gladstone Commercial Corp (GOOD, Company).

PAR is from the Technology sector, while GOOD is from the Real Estate sector.

5-Year PerformanceGOOD has outperformed PAR, delivering a return of -3.2% compared to -24.7%

PAR vs GOOD - Performance Comparison

Key Characteristics

Financial metrics and valuation ratios

Market Cap
Winner
PAR
$633M
GOOD
$629M
Max Drawdown
PAR
88.42%
Winner
GOOD
73.73%
Sharpe Ratio
PAR
-1.89
Winner
GOOD
0.12
5Y Beta
PAR
1.37
Winner
GOOD
0.45
Industry
PAR
Software - Application
GOOD
Reit - Diversified
P/E Ratio
Winner
PAR
-8.19
GOOD
29.53
Forward P/E
Winner
PAR
9.27
GOOD
52.36
PEG Ratio
PAR
-0.00
GOOD
N/A
Dividend Yield
PAR
N/A
GOOD
9.21%
5Y Dividends CAGR
PAR
N/A
GOOD
-4.40%
5Y EPS CAGR
PAR
2.39%
Winner
GOOD
3.84%
Debt to Equity
Winner
PAR
51.37%
GOOD
511.62%
Free Cash Flow Yield
PAR
-4.72%
Winner
GOOD
14.04%

PAR vs GOOD - Historical Returns

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

1M
PAR
+1.04%
Winner
GOOD
+5.53%
3M
Winner
PAR
+15.80%
GOOD
+4.47%
6M
PAR
-50.82%
Winner
GOOD
+16.72%
1Y
PAR
-78.18%
Winner
GOOD
+1.72%
5Y(CAGR)
PAR
-24.72%
Winner
GOOD
-3.25%
10Y(CAGR)
Winner
PAR
+11.61%
GOOD
+4.87%
Max(CAGR)
PAR
+6.40%
Winner
GOOD
+7.69%

PAR vs GOOD - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

YearPARGOOD
2026-56.51%+24.51%
2025-49.27%-27.71%
2024+70.23%+33.12%
2023+64.05%-22.93%
2022-50.95%-21.83%
2021-12.39%+56.45%
2020+98.83%-7.47%
2019+39.85%+30.45%
2018+136.41%-6.71%
2017+70.00%+11.63%
2016-13.35%+53.74%
2015+12.73%-7.62%
2014+14.95%+4.17%
2013+9.44%+7.43%
2012+23.12%+10.39%
2011-34.11%+0.80%
2010-5.46%+53.14%
2009+0.70%+68.57%
2008-26.97%-46.07%
2007-13.37%-6.25%
2006-51.23%+31.90%
2005+146.76%+1.83%
2004+44.39%+6.14%
2003+16.30%+13.16%
2002+165.39%N/A
2001+38.66%N/A
2000-62.94%N/A
1999+5.56%N/A

PAR vs GOOD Drawdown Comparison

The maximum drawdown for PAR was -88.42%, occurring on Nov 25, 2008. Recovery took 3301 trading sessions.

The maximum drawdown for GOOD was -67.15%, occurring on Mar 9, 2009. Recovery took 869 trading sessions.

The current PAR drawdown is -82.48%. The current GOOD drawdown is -26.63%.

RankPARGOOD
#1-88.42%
Jul 22, 2005 - Aug 31, 2018
-67.15%
Oct 27, 2006 - Apr 14, 2010
#2-86.68%
Feb 22, 2021 - Apr 10, 2026
-66.25%
Nov 1, 2019 - Apr 29, 2021
#3-72.99%
Feb 8, 2000 - Oct 18, 2002
-53.23%
Dec 31, 2021 - May 16, 2023
#4-69.20%
Jan 29, 2020 - Aug 6, 2020
-26.07%
Mar 20, 2015 - Apr 25, 2016
#5-44.14%
Dec 3, 2002 - Dec 2, 2003
-25.84%
Nov 29, 2017 - Feb 20, 2019
#6-37.19%
Aug 31, 2018 - Feb 13, 2019
-22.75%
May 31, 2011 - Jan 30, 2012
#7-32.11%
Apr 5, 2004 - Jan 25, 2005
-15.90%
May 17, 2013 - Feb 27, 2015
#8-25.21%
Jun 10, 2019 - Nov 8, 2019
-14.43%
Apr 26, 2010 - Jun 25, 2010
#9-22.66%
Feb 25, 2019 - May 28, 2019
-13.35%
Feb 3, 2012 - Aug 29, 2012
#10-19.81%
Sep 28, 2020 - Nov 11, 2020
-13.21%
Sep 23, 2016 - Nov 16, 2016
#11-16.28%
Nov 19, 1999 - Jan 19, 2000
-12.59%
Apr 18, 2017 - Sep 26, 2017
#12-15.49%
Jan 20, 2021 - Feb 2, 2021
-11.64%
Apr 4, 2006 - Aug 23, 2006
#13-13.90%
Mar 5, 2004 - Apr 1, 2004
-10.68%
Jun 25, 2010 - Oct 5, 2010
#14-12.12%
Dec 17, 2020 - Jan 14, 2021
-10.44%
Dec 23, 2004 - Aug 31, 2005
#15-11.69%
Jun 17, 2005 - Jul 12, 2005
-10.20%
Sep 24, 2012 - Jan 10, 2013

Correlation

Correlation between PAR and GOOD is 0.75 which considered as a strong positive correlation - the stocks tend to move together.

0.75
-101

Dividend Comparison (2003 - 2026)

PAR vs GOOD dividend yield comparison.

YearPARGOOD
20260.00%4.69%
20250.00%11.25%
20240.00%7.39%
20230.00%9.06%
20220.00%8.13%
20210.00%5.83%
20200.00%8.35%
20191.01%6.86%
20180.00%8.37%
20170.00%7.12%
20160.00%7.46%
20150.00%10.28%
20140.00%8.74%
20130.00%8.35%
20120.00%8.36%
20110.00%8.55%
20100.00%7.97%
20090.00%11.19%
20080.00%17.65%
20070.00%8.21%
20060.00%7.15%
20050.00%5.82%
20040.00%2.81%
20030.00%0.06%

Select Stocks to Compare