NVO vs TMUS
Comparison between Novo Nordisk (NVO, Company) and T-Mobile US Inc (TMUS, Company).
NVO is from the Healthcare sector, while TMUS is from the Communication Services sector.
5-Year PerformanceTMUS has outperformed NVO, delivering a return of +5.4% compared to +5.1%
NVO vs TMUS - Performance Comparison
Key Characteristics
Financial metrics and valuation ratios
NVO vs TMUS - Historical Returns
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
NVO vs TMUS - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
| Year | NVO | TMUS |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | -6.38% | -8.49% |
| 2025 | -40.30% | -6.09% |
| 2024 | -14.82% | +38.32% |
| 2023 | +52.98% | +15.81% |
| 2022 | +26.30% | +22.35% |
| 2021 | +59.85% | -12.42% |
| 2020 | +22.30% | +71.59% |
| 2019 | +26.72% | +20.17% |
| 2018 | -13.76% | -0.67% |
| 2017 | +52.70% | +8.90% |
| 2016 | -36.16% | +47.65% |
| 2015 | +38.20% | +43.30% |
| 2014 | +16.84% | -19.27% |
| 2013 | +12.95% | +416.85% |
| 2012 | +41.35% | +5.86% |
| 2011 | +4.80% | -33.59% |
| 2010 | +73.64% | +58.47% |
| 2009 | +22.93% | -48.65% |
| 2008 | -18.66% | -20.38% |
| 2007 | +57.08% | -29.01% |
| 2006 | +48.69% | N/A |
| 2005 | +7.34% | N/A |
| 2004 | +33.06% | N/A |
| 2003 | +40.89% | N/A |
| 2002 | -27.39% | N/A |
| 2001 | +13.36% | N/A |
| 2000 | +32.47% | N/A |
| 1999 | +6.16% | N/A |
NVO vs TMUS Drawdown Comparison
The maximum drawdown for NVO was -74.71%, occurring on Mar 27, 2026. This drawdown has not yet recovered.
The maximum drawdown for TMUS was -86.29%, occurring on Jan 28, 2010. Recovery took 1576 trading sessions.
The current NVO drawdown is -65.59%. The current TMUS drawdown is -32.25%.
| Rank | NVO | TMUS |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | -74.71% Jun 25, 2024 - Mar 27, 2026 | -86.29% Jul 17, 2007 - Oct 17, 2013 |
| #2 | -51.38% Aug 6, 2001 - Feb 9, 2004 | -33.66% Mar 3, 2025 - Jun 4, 2026 |
| #3 | -46.53% Aug 3, 2015 - Jan 19, 2018 | -31.99% Jul 16, 2021 - Oct 28, 2022 |
| #4 | -41.56% Apr 8, 2008 - Feb 16, 2010 | -29.52% May 29, 2014 - May 20, 2015 |
| #5 | -28.04% Apr 21, 2011 - Feb 7, 2012 | -26.04% Feb 19, 2020 - May 18, 2020 |
| #6 | -27.56% Jan 26, 2018 - Nov 1, 2019 | -21.24% Sep 23, 2015 - Jun 2, 2016 |
| #7 | -26.73% Sep 26, 2000 - Jun 20, 2001 | -18.97% Jun 2, 2017 - Sep 13, 2018 |
| #8 | -23.65% Mar 4, 2020 - Apr 20, 2020 | -16.97% Dec 2, 2022 - Dec 1, 2023 |
| #9 | -21.43% Feb 6, 2013 - Jan 10, 2014 | -16.47% Dec 31, 2013 - May 19, 2014 |
| #10 | -21.36% Apr 7, 2022 - Nov 28, 2022 | -14.43% Nov 29, 2024 - Feb 6, 2025 |
| #11 | -20.48% Dec 16, 2021 - Apr 6, 2022 | -13.75% Sep 27, 2018 - Feb 14, 2019 |
| #12 | -19.00% Apr 21, 2005 - Mar 3, 2006 | -12.70% Jan 8, 2021 - May 6, 2021 |
| #13 | -16.44% Jan 10, 2000 - May 3, 2000 | -11.43% Jul 26, 2019 - Feb 7, 2020 |
| #14 | -14.94% Dec 4, 2007 - Feb 22, 2008 | -11.31% Jun 4, 2007 - Jul 12, 2007 |
| #15 | -14.66% Oct 22, 2012 - Jan 10, 2013 | -10.23% Nov 4, 2013 - Dec 19, 2013 |
Correlation
Correlation between NVO and TMUS is 0.82 which considered as a strong positive correlation - the stocks tend to move together.
Dividend Comparison (2000 - 2026)
NVO vs TMUS dividend yield comparison.
| Year | NVO | TMUS |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 2.57% | 1.13% |
| 2025 | 3.31% | 1.80% |
| 2024 | 1.68% | 1.28% |
| 2023 | 1.00% | 0.41% |
| 2022 | 1.20% | 0.00% |
| 2021 | 1.35% | 0.00% |
| 2020 | 1.87% | 0.00% |
| 2019 | 2.14% | 0.00% |
| 2018 | 1.45% | 0.00% |
| 2017 | 1.52% | 0.00% |
| 2016 | 2.87% | 0.00% |
| 2015 | 0.92% | 0.00% |
| 2014 | 1.43% | 0.00% |
| 2013 | 1.23% | 24.08% |
| 2012 | 1.12% | 0.00% |
| 2011 | 1.18% | 0.00% |
| 2010 | 0.87% | 0.00% |
| 2009 | 1.22% | 0.00% |
| 2008 | 1.32% | 0.00% |
| 2007 | 0.69% | 0.00% |
| 2006 | 0.83% | 0.00% |
| 2005 | 1.10% | 0.00% |
| 2004 | 0.96% | 0.00% |
| 2003 | 0.92% | 0.00% |
| 2002 | 0.98% | 0.00% |
| 2001 | 0.57% | 0.00% |
| 2000 | 0.53% | 0.00% |
Select Stocks to Compare
More Comparisons
Compare with similar stocks