StockComparison Logo
vs

NTAP vs RJF

Comparison between Netapp Inc (NTAP, Company) and Raymond James Financial Inc (RJF, Company).

NTAP is from the Technology sector, while RJF is from the Financial Services sector.

5-Year PerformanceNTAP has outperformed RJF, delivering a return of +18.4% compared to +13.0%

NTAP vs RJF - Performance Comparison

Key Characteristics

Financial metrics and valuation ratios

Market Cap
NTAP
$28B
Winner
RJF
$28B
Max Drawdown
NTAP
96.21%
Winner
RJF
69.99%
Sharpe Ratio
Winner
NTAP
1.33
RJF
0.20
5Y Beta
NTAP
1.26
Winner
RJF
0.96
Industry
NTAP
Software - Infrastructure
RJF
Asset Management
P/E Ratio
NTAP
23.46
Winner
RJF
13.36
Forward P/E
NTAP
19.34
Winner
RJF
11.44
PEG Ratio
Winner
NTAP
2.53
RJF
9.11
Dividend Yield
NTAP
1.16%
Winner
RJF
1.38%
5Y Dividends CAGR
NTAP
6.25%
Winner
RJF
20.55%
5Y EPS CAGR
Winner
NTAP
17.86%
RJF
16.38%
Debt to Equity
NTAP
214.68%
Winner
RJF
0.00%
Free Cash Flow Yield
NTAP
5.69%
Winner
RJF
8.42%
P/S Ratio
NTAP
4.21
Winner
RJF
1.90
P/B Ratio
NTAP
24.32
Winner
RJF
2.22

NTAP vs RJF - Historical Returns

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

1M
Winner
NTAP
+46.35%
RJF
-4.67%
3M
Winner
NTAP
+64.41%
RJF
-2.74%
6M
Winner
NTAP
+43.86%
RJF
-6.50%
1Y
Winner
NTAP
+62.77%
RJF
+7.02%
5Y(CAGR)
Winner
NTAP
+18.37%
RJF
+12.99%
10Y(CAGR)
Winner
NTAP
+23.99%
RJF
+16.70%
Max(CAGR)
NTAP
+9.89%
Winner
RJF
+14.57%

NTAP vs RJF - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

YearNTAPRJF
2026+57.68%-7.08%
2025-5.71%+4.63%
2024+37.20%+39.82%
2023+49.33%+6.85%
2022-33.23%+5.37%
2021+45.48%+61.61%
2020+9.14%+7.12%
2019+6.25%+22.83%
2018+9.17%-15.47%
2017+58.58%+29.22%
2016+39.25%+24.81%
2015-34.70%+2.79%
2014+4.23%+12.50%
2013+20.85%+32.21%
2012-8.77%+22.00%
2011-36.82%-4.67%
2010+60.75%+37.00%
2009+132.63%+34.87%
2008-43.26%-45.35%
2007-37.52%+7.34%
2006+40.74%+19.45%
2005-17.43%+24.72%
2004+60.25%+26.57%
2003+91.03%+26.41%
2002-57.95%-13.96%
2001-57.48%+1.54%
2000+51.04%+100.41%
1999+124.49%-6.74%

NTAP vs RJF Drawdown Comparison

The maximum drawdown for NTAP was -96.21%, occurring on Oct 8, 2002. Recovery took 5932 trading sessions.

The maximum drawdown for RJF was -69.67%, occurring on Mar 6, 2009. Recovery took 590 trading sessions.

The current NTAP drawdown is -7.75%. The current RJF drawdown is -13.29%.

RankNTAPRJF
#1-96.21%
Oct 20, 2000 - May 22, 2024
-69.67%
Sep 19, 2008 - Jan 24, 2011
#2-58.09%
Mar 9, 2000 - Sep 18, 2000
-45.59%
Feb 19, 2020 - Jan 6, 2021
#3-42.59%
Jul 10, 2024 - May 22, 2026
-44.37%
Oct 31, 2007 - Sep 19, 2008
#4-22.80%
Sep 22, 2000 - Oct 20, 2000
-40.65%
Jan 4, 2001 - Oct 6, 2003
#5-17.94%
Dec 22, 1999 - Jan 10, 2000
-38.15%
Feb 18, 2011 - Sep 14, 2012
#6-16.01%
Jan 18, 2000 - Feb 4, 2000
-33.45%
Jul 16, 2015 - Oct 27, 2016
#7-11.77%
Dec 14, 1999 - Dec 22, 1999
-32.11%
Nov 10, 2022 - Mar 5, 2024
#8-11.64%
Nov 29, 1999 - Dec 2, 1999
-31.02%
May 22, 2018 - Feb 18, 2020
#9-9.67%
Nov 9, 1999 - Nov 16, 1999
-28.12%
Jan 24, 2025 - Sep 18, 2025
#10-8.00%
Feb 24, 2000 - Mar 6, 2000
-25.75%
Feb 9, 2022 - Oct 28, 2022
#11-7.75%
Jun 3, 2026 - Jun 5, 2026
-22.11%
Mar 24, 2000 - Jun 16, 2000
#12-6.92%
Jan 10, 2000 - Jan 14, 2000
-21.27%
Nov 16, 1999 - Mar 24, 2000
#13-6.61%
Nov 17, 1999 - Nov 26, 1999
-19.64%
Sep 29, 2025 - Mar 30, 2026
#14-4.62%
Feb 16, 2000 - Feb 23, 2000
-19.45%
Nov 3, 2003 - Nov 3, 2004
#15-4.26%
Feb 11, 2000 - Feb 16, 2000
-19.02%
Mar 18, 2005 - Oct 4, 2005

Correlation

Correlation between NTAP and RJF is 0.89 which considered as a strong positive correlation - the stocks tend to move together.

0.89
-101

Dividend Comparison (1999 - 2026)

NTAP vs RJF dividend yield comparison.

YearNTAPRJF
20260.62%0.71%
20251.94%1.25%
20241.76%0.87%
20232.27%1.53%
20223.33%1.67%
20212.13%1.04%
20202.90%1.16%
20192.83%1.93%
20182.01%1.48%
20171.41%0.74%
20162.10%1.18%
20152.60%1.28%
20141.52%1.15%
20130.73%1.11%
20120.00%1.38%
20110.00%1.68%
20100.00%1.41%
20090.00%1.85%
20080.00%3.21%
20070.00%0.92%
20060.00%1.12%
20050.00%0.96%
20040.00%0.94%
20030.00%0.96%
20020.00%1.22%
20010.00%1.27%
20000.00%0.90%
19990.00%0.40%

Select Stocks to Compare