NOM vs SCUB
Comparison between Nuveen Missouri Quality Municipal Income Fund (NOM, ETF) and Sterling Capital Ultra Short Bond ETF (SCUB, ETF).
NOM vs SCUB - Performance Comparison
Key Characteristics
Financial metrics and valuation ratios
Net Assets
NOM
$25M
Winner
SCUB
$25M
Expense Ratio
NOM
N/A
SCUB
0.30%
Max Drawdown
NOM
55.11%
Winner
SCUB
0.36%
Sharpe Ratio
NOM
0.72
Winner
SCUB
1.75
5Y Beta
NOM
0.05
Winner
SCUB
0.02
5Y Dividends CAGR
NOM
10.46%
SCUB
N/A
NOM vs SCUB - Historical Returns
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
1M
Winner
NOM
+4.14%
SCUB
+0.29%
3M
NOM
-1.38%
SCUB
N/A
6M
NOM
+2.32%
SCUB
N/A
1Y
NOM
+18.90%
SCUB
N/A
5Y(CAGR)
NOM
-0.85%
SCUB
N/A
10Y(CAGR)
NOM
+0.18%
SCUB
N/A
Max(CAGR)
NOM
+4.31%
Winner
SCUB
+5.21%
NOM vs SCUB - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
| Year | NOM | SCUB |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | -5.27% | +0.94% |
| 2025 | +8.10% | N/A |
| 2024 | +26.93% | N/A |
| 2023 | -1.80% | N/A |
| 2022 | -25.49% | N/A |
| 2021 | +8.77% | N/A |
| 2020 | +1.20% | N/A |
| 2019 | +28.92% | N/A |
| 2018 | -15.69% | N/A |
| 2017 | -4.00% | N/A |
| 2016 | +1.64% | N/A |
| 2015 | +6.93% | N/A |
| 2014 | +23.67% | N/A |
| 2013 | -20.34% | N/A |
| 2012 | +3.99% | N/A |
| 2011 | +22.27% | N/A |
| 2010 | +0.72% | N/A |
| 2009 | +34.00% | N/A |
| 2008 | -9.09% | N/A |
| 2007 | -13.11% | N/A |
| 2006 | +1.27% | N/A |
| 2005 | -1.61% | N/A |
| 2004 | +16.93% | N/A |
| 2003 | +11.43% | N/A |
| 2002 | +14.28% | N/A |
| 2001 | +16.07% | N/A |
| 2000 | +4.42% | N/A |
| 1999 | +8.29% | N/A |
NOM vs SCUB Drawdown Comparison
The maximum drawdown for NOM was -44.22%, occurring on Oct 27, 2023. This drawdown has not yet recovered.
The maximum drawdown for SCUB was -0.08%, occurring on May 18, 2026. Recovery took 5 trading sessions.
The current NOM drawdown is -15.39%. The current SCUB drawdown is -0.04%.
| Rank | NOM | SCUB |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | -44.22% Aug 24, 2021 - Oct 27, 2023 | -0.08% May 13, 2026 - May 20, 2026 |
| #2 | -40.34% May 9, 2007 - Dec 2, 2009 | -0.08% Apr 14, 2026 - Apr 17, 2026 |
| #3 | -32.42% Oct 31, 2017 - Mar 24, 2021 | -0.04% Apr 17, 2026 - Apr 22, 2026 |
| #4 | -28.00% Jan 7, 2013 - Nov 23, 2015 | -0.04% May 20, 2026 - May 26, 2026 |
| #5 | -18.99% Mar 19, 2004 - Nov 26, 2004 | -0.04% Apr 22, 2026 - Apr 24, 2026 |
| #6 | -17.76% Jan 10, 2006 - May 9, 2007 | -0.04% Apr 27, 2026 - Apr 30, 2026 |
| #7 | -16.49% Jul 21, 2010 - Nov 8, 2011 | -0.04% Jun 4, 2026 - Jun 5, 2026 |
| #8 | -14.41% Aug 5, 2016 - Oct 31, 2017 | -0.03% May 29, 2026 - Jun 4, 2026 |
| #9 | -12.02% Dec 31, 2004 - Dec 13, 2005 | -0.02% May 6, 2026 - May 8, 2026 |
| #10 | -10.96% Aug 17, 2012 - Jan 7, 2013 | N/A |
| #11 | -10.95% Dec 15, 2009 - Mar 8, 2010 | N/A |
| #12 | -10.88% Oct 8, 2002 - May 22, 2003 | N/A |
| #13 | -8.23% Mar 15, 2010 - Apr 23, 2010 | N/A |
| #14 | -7.94% Jan 12, 2000 - Aug 15, 2000 | N/A |
| #15 | -7.55% Dec 2, 2009 - Dec 10, 2009 | N/A |
Correlation
Correlation between NOM and SCUB is 1.00 which considered as a very strong positive correlation - the stocks move almost identically together.
1.00
-101
Dividend Comparison (1999 - 2026)
NOM vs SCUB dividend yield comparison.
| Year | NOM | SCUB |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 2.22% | 1.01% |
| 2025 | 6.58% | 0.00% |
| 2024 | 5.45% | 0.00% |
| 2023 | 3.17% | 0.00% |
| 2022 | 4.45% | 0.00% |
| 2021 | 3.60% | 0.00% |
| 2020 | 3.43% | 0.00% |
| 2019 | 3.60% | 0.00% |
| 2018 | 4.82% | 0.00% |
| 2017 | 4.74% | 0.00% |
| 2016 | 4.51% | 0.00% |
| 2015 | 4.76% | 0.00% |
| 2014 | 4.88% | 0.00% |
| 2013 | 5.80% | 0.00% |
| 2012 | 4.70% | 0.00% |
| 2011 | 4.75% | 0.00% |
| 2010 | 5.14% | 0.00% |
| 2009 | 4.26% | 0.00% |
| 2008 | 5.41% | 0.00% |
| 2007 | 5.71% | 0.00% |
| 2006 | 4.55% | 0.00% |
| 2005 | 5.53% | 0.00% |
| 2004 | 4.64% | 0.00% |
| 2003 | 5.10% | 0.00% |
| 2002 | 5.16% | 0.00% |
| 2001 | 4.70% | 0.00% |
| 2000 | 5.60% | 0.00% |
| 1999 | 0.93% | 0.00% |
Select Stocks to Compare
Popular: NOM vs SPYSCUB vs SPY
More Comparisons
Compare with similar stocks