NMT vs KRMA

Comparison between Nuveen Massachusetts Quality Municipal Income Fund (NMT, ETF) and GLOBAL X CONSCIOUS COMPANIES ETF (KRMA, ETF).

5-Year PerformanceKRMA has outperformed NMT, delivering a return of +9.9% compared to +1.8%

NMT vs KRMA - Performance Comparison

Log

Key Characteristics

Financial metrics and valuation ratios

Metric	NMT(ETF)	KRMA(ETF)
Net Assets	$116M	$116M
Expense Ratio	N/A	0.43%
Max Drawdown	48.99%	36.16%
Sharpe Ratio	1.26	1.19
5Y Beta	0.14	0.94
P/E Ratio	N/A	24.48
Forward P/E	N/A	18.11
PEG Ratio	N/A	0.42
5Y Dividends CAGR	8.85%	24.01%
5Y EPS CAGR	N/A	22.60%
Debt to Equity	N/A	38.19%

Net Assets

NMT

$116M

Winner

KRMA

$116M

Expense Ratio

NMT

N/A

KRMA

0.43%

Max Drawdown

NMT

48.99%

Winner

KRMA

36.16%

Sharpe Ratio

Winner

NMT

1.26

KRMA

1.19

5Y Beta

Winner

NMT

0.14

KRMA

0.94

P/E Ratio

NMT

N/A

KRMA

24.48

Forward P/E

NMT

N/A

KRMA

18.11

PEG Ratio

NMT

N/A

KRMA

0.42

5Y Dividends CAGR

NMT

8.85%

Winner

KRMA

24.01%

5Y EPS CAGR

NMT

N/A

KRMA

22.60%

Debt to Equity

NMT

N/A

KRMA

38.19%

NMT vs KRMA - Historical Returns

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

Period	NMT	KRMA
1 month	+0.87%	+1.96%
3 months	+3.31%	+6.26%
6 months	+14.15%	+10.26%
1 year	+19.95%	+19.76%
5 years(CAGR)	+1.76%	+9.89%
10 years(CAGR)	+2.40%	+13.60%
Max(CAGR)	+4.60%	+13.58%

NMT

+0.87%

Winner

KRMA

+1.96%

NMT

+3.31%

Winner

KRMA

+6.26%

Winner

NMT

+14.15%

KRMA

+10.26%

Winner

NMT

+19.95%

KRMA

+19.76%

5Y(CAGR)

NMT

+1.76%

Winner

KRMA

+9.89%

10Y(CAGR)

NMT

+2.40%

Winner

KRMA

+13.60%

Max(CAGR)

NMT

+4.60%

Winner

KRMA

+13.58%

NMT vs KRMA - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

Year	NMT	KRMA
2026	+17.11%	+10.19%
2025	+5.85%	+14.39%
2024	+16.17%	+18.87%
2023	+1.52%	+22.70%
2022	-30.75%	-19.09%
2021	+9.84%	+29.42%
2020	+6.18%	+16.40%
2019	+23.70%	+30.21%
2018	-14.40%	-4.25%
2017	+13.61%	+22.74%
2016	+0.05%	+5.65%
2015	+8.91%	N/A
2014	+15.06%	N/A
2013	-16.13%	N/A
2012	+6.26%	N/A
2011	+17.17%	N/A
2010	+4.45%	N/A
2009	+43.04%	N/A
2008	-20.35%	N/A
2007	-7.15%	N/A
2006	-3.17%	N/A
2005	+3.83%	N/A
2004	+8.22%	N/A
2003	+4.73%	N/A
2002	+6.23%	N/A
2001	+12.45%	N/A
2000	+10.29%	N/A
1999	-6.15%	N/A

NMT vs KRMA Drawdown Comparison

The maximum drawdown for NMT was -40.09%, occurring on Oct 10, 2008. Recovery took 895 trading sessions.

The maximum drawdown for KRMA was -36.16%, occurring on Mar 23, 2020. Recovery took 125 trading sessions.

The current NMT drawdown is -2.88%. The current KRMA drawdown is -2.27%.

Rank	NMT	KRMA
#1	-40.09% Mar 2, 2006 - Sep 21, 2009	-36.16% Feb 19, 2020 - Aug 17, 2020
#2	-38.87% Nov 22, 2021 - May 1, 2026	-26.12% Dec 29, 2021 - Jan 25, 2024
#3	-21.46% Jan 24, 2013 - Dec 3, 2015	-19.41% Dec 4, 2024 - Jul 1, 2025
#4	-20.51% Jul 25, 2016 - Aug 1, 2019	-17.48% Sep 21, 2018 - Mar 19, 2019
#5	-18.20% Oct 21, 2010 - Jan 5, 2012	-9.59% Jan 26, 2018 - Jul 25, 2018
#6	-17.05% Jan 24, 2020 - Jul 10, 2020	-8.92% Sep 2, 2020 - Oct 12, 2020
#7	-16.42% Jun 4, 2003 - Mar 31, 2004	-8.62% Jan 6, 2026 - Apr 15, 2026
#8	-15.35% Feb 15, 2005 - Sep 7, 2005	-8.36% Jul 16, 2024 - Sep 19, 2024
#9	-13.69% Mar 31, 2004 - Oct 27, 2004	-7.02% Jul 26, 2019 - Oct 30, 2019
#10	-9.72% Nov 3, 1999 - Jul 27, 2000	-6.95% Oct 12, 2020 - Nov 6, 2020
#11	-8.85% Oct 7, 2009 - Mar 4, 2010	-6.30% May 3, 2019 - Jun 19, 2019
#12	-8.72% Feb 13, 2012 - May 2, 2012	-6.01% Dec 14, 2020 - Feb 8, 2021
#13	-8.29% Oct 8, 2002 - Mar 11, 2003	-5.90% Oct 28, 2025 - Dec 10, 2025
#14	-7.58% Oct 15, 2012 - Jan 17, 2013	-5.70% Sep 2, 2021 - Oct 26, 2021
#15	-7.49% Sep 7, 2005 - Feb 28, 2006	-5.65% Mar 27, 2024 - May 15, 2024

Correlation

Correlation between NMT and KRMA is 0.57 which considered as a moderate positive correlation - the stocks show some tendency to move together.

0.57

-101

Dividend Comparison (1999 - 2026)

NMT vs KRMA dividend yield comparison.

Year	NMT	KRMA
2026	3.45%	0.36%
2025	7.27%	2.59%
2024	5.94%	0.91%
2023	3.06%	1.16%
2022	4.50%	0.86%
2021	3.43%	1.07%
2020	3.60%	0.96%
2019	3.46%	1.52%
2018	4.66%	1.82%
2017	4.57%	1.21%
2016	5.30%	0.95%
2015	5.15%	0.00%
2014	5.05%	0.00%
2013	5.63%	0.00%
2012	4.93%	0.00%
2011	5.24%	0.00%
2010	6.12%	0.00%
2009	5.31%	0.00%
2008	6.87%	0.00%
2007	5.04%	0.00%
2006	5.10%	0.00%
2005	5.67%	0.00%
2004	5.64%	0.00%
2003	6.12%	0.00%
2002	5.39%	0.00%
2001	6.16%	0.00%
2000	5.75%	0.00%
1999	1.00%	0.00%