NMR vs STZ
Comparison between Nomura Holdings Inc (NMR, Company) and Constellation Brands Inc - Class A (STZ, Company).
NMR is from the Financial Services sector, while STZ is from the Consumer Defensive sector.
5-Year PerformanceNMR has outperformed STZ, delivering a return of +14.9% compared to -6.9%
NMR vs STZ - Performance Comparison
Key Characteristics
Financial metrics and valuation ratios
NMR vs STZ - Historical Returns
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
NMR vs STZ - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
| Year | NMR | STZ |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | +6.00% | +5.03% |
| 2025 | +53.57% | -36.43% |
| 2024 | +35.63% | -7.92% |
| 2023 | +21.20% | +7.76% |
| 2022 | -12.30% | -7.14% |
| 2021 | -17.05% | +17.35% |
| 2020 | +3.34% | +18.30% |
| 2019 | +35.43% | +17.51% |
| 2018 | -36.95% | -28.09% |
| 2017 | -0.51% | +49.28% |
| 2016 | +10.26% | +10.03% |
| 2015 | +0.64% | +47.20% |
| 2014 | -23.82% | +41.78% |
| 2013 | +29.46% | +87.38% |
| 2012 | +92.81% | +70.72% |
| 2011 | -52.04% | -4.35% |
| 2010 | -14.33% | +37.41% |
| 2009 | -11.17% | -3.16% |
| 2008 | -49.10% | -32.84% |
| 2007 | -11.80% | -16.76% |
| 2006 | -1.99% | +11.66% |
| 2005 | +34.20% | +12.91% |
| 2004 | -14.69% | +41.37% |
| 2003 | +52.55% | +33.70% |
| 2002 | -13.30% | +10.92% |
| 2001 | -29.05% | +50.35% |
| 2000 | +2.57% | +17.95% |
| 1999 | +11.76% | -13.01% |
NMR vs STZ Drawdown Comparison
The maximum drawdown for NMR was -89.30%, occurring on Nov 23, 2011. This drawdown has not yet recovered.
The maximum drawdown for STZ was -64.97%, occurring on Nov 12, 2008. Recovery took 1797 trading sessions.
The current NMR drawdown is -56.09%. The current STZ drawdown is -43.41%.
| Rank | NMR | STZ |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | -89.30% Mar 31, 2000 - Nov 23, 2011 | -64.97% Jun 28, 2005 - Aug 15, 2012 |
| #2 | -20.52% Feb 11, 2000 - Mar 29, 2000 | -53.52% Apr 27, 2018 - Jan 7, 2021 |
| #3 | -11.59% Nov 26, 1999 - Jan 4, 2000 | -51.28% Mar 27, 2024 - Nov 7, 2025 |
| #4 | -11.04% Jan 4, 2000 - Jan 18, 2000 | -31.25% Jun 28, 2002 - Nov 5, 2003 |
| #5 | -4.76% Nov 12, 1999 - Nov 22, 1999 | -28.92% Nov 5, 1999 - Jan 11, 2001 |
| #6 | -4.45% Jan 24, 2000 - Jan 27, 2000 | -21.59% Jan 29, 2013 - Feb 14, 2013 |
| #7 | -4.04% Jan 18, 2000 - Jan 21, 2000 | -21.32% Aug 20, 2001 - Jan 8, 2002 |
| #8 | -3.28% Jan 31, 2000 - Feb 3, 2000 | -20.06% Dec 2, 2022 - Jul 19, 2023 |
| #9 | -2.21% Nov 1, 1999 - Nov 10, 1999 | -16.31% Jan 4, 2022 - Apr 19, 2022 |
| #10 | -0.87% Jan 27, 2000 - Jan 31, 2000 | -16.00% Jul 31, 2023 - Mar 25, 2024 |
| #11 | N/A | -15.07% Apr 5, 2001 - May 17, 2001 |
| #12 | N/A | -15.02% May 7, 2002 - Jun 27, 2002 |
| #13 | N/A | -14.91% Oct 10, 2016 - Apr 6, 2017 |
| #14 | N/A | -14.16% Aug 25, 2022 - Nov 25, 2022 |
| #15 | N/A | -13.93% Apr 12, 2005 - Jun 28, 2005 |
Correlation
Correlation between NMR and STZ is -0.54 which considered as a moderate negative correlation - the stocks show some tendency to move in opposite directions.
Dividend Comparison (2000 - 2026)
NMR vs STZ dividend yield comparison.
| Year | NMR | STZ |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 1.71% | 1.40% |
| 2025 | 4.91% | 2.95% |
| 2024 | 4.29% | 1.77% |
| 2023 | 1.20% | 1.44% |
| 2022 | 3.86% | 1.36% |
| 2021 | 0.00% | 1.21% |
| 2020 | 0.86% | 1.37% |
| 2019 | 0.00% | 1.58% |
| 2018 | 0.00% | 1.70% |
| 2017 | 1.70% | 0.86% |
| 2016 | 1.79% | 0.98% |
| 2015 | 3.34% | 0.65% |
| 2014 | 2.44% | 0.00% |
| 2013 | 1.77% | 0.00% |
| 2012 | 1.28% | 0.00% |
| 2011 | 5.11% | 0.00% |
| 2010 | 1.37% | 0.00% |
| 2009 | 0.57% | 0.00% |
| 2008 | 2.85% | 0.00% |
| 2006 | 2.36% | 0.00% |
| 2005 | 1.07% | 0.00% |
| 2004 | 1.08% | 0.00% |
| 2003 | 1.03% | 0.00% |
| 2002 | 1.05% | 0.00% |
| 2001 | 5.57% | 0.00% |
| 2000 | 6.49% | 0.00% |
Select Stocks to Compare
More Comparisons
Compare with similar stocks