NMR vs GFI
Comparison between Nomura Holdings Inc (NMR, Company) and Gold Fields Ltd (GFI, Company).
NMR is from the Financial Services sector, while GFI is from the Basic Materials sector.
5-Year PerformanceGFI has outperformed NMR, delivering a return of +35.1% compared to +17.3%
NMR vs GFI - Performance Comparison
Key Characteristics
Financial metrics and valuation ratios
NMR vs GFI - Historical Returns
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
NMR vs GFI - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
| Year | NMR | GFI |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | +12.27% | -18.05% |
| 2025 | +53.57% | +219.66% |
| 2024 | +35.63% | -3.59% |
| 2023 | +21.20% | +38.57% |
| 2022 | -12.30% | +0.90% |
| 2021 | -17.05% | +8.58% |
| 2020 | +3.34% | +43.65% |
| 2019 | +35.43% | +90.08% |
| 2018 | -36.95% | -19.01% |
| 2017 | -0.51% | +35.42% |
| 2016 | +10.26% | +4.62% |
| 2015 | +0.64% | -40.18% |
| 2014 | -23.82% | +40.12% |
| 2013 | +29.46% | -74.12% |
| 2012 | +92.81% | -17.98% |
| 2011 | -52.04% | -14.75% |
| 2010 | -14.33% | +34.79% |
| 2009 | -11.17% | +37.23% |
| 2008 | -49.10% | -33.97% |
| 2007 | -11.80% | -21.28% |
| 2006 | -1.99% | -0.98% |
| 2005 | +34.20% | +47.02% |
| 2004 | -14.69% | -11.51% |
| 2003 | +52.55% | +2.30% |
| 2002 | -13.30% | +196.74% |
| 2001 | -29.05% | +52.73% |
| 2000 | +2.57% | -21.30% |
| 1999 | +11.76% | +6.59% |
NMR vs GFI Drawdown Comparison
The maximum drawdown for NMR was -89.30%, occurring on Nov 23, 2011. This drawdown has not yet recovered.
The maximum drawdown for GFI was -90.91%, occurring on Nov 17, 2015. Recovery took 4643 trading sessions.
The current NMR drawdown is -53.49%. The current GFI drawdown is -41.97%.
| Rank | NMR | GFI |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | -89.30% Mar 31, 2000 - Nov 23, 2011 | -90.91% May 11, 2006 - Oct 22, 2024 |
| #2 | -20.52% Feb 11, 2000 - Mar 29, 2000 | -53.38% Feb 18, 2000 - Jan 10, 2002 |
| #3 | -11.59% Nov 26, 1999 - Jan 4, 2000 | -46.53% Jan 28, 2026 - Jun 24, 2026 |
| #4 | -11.04% Jan 4, 2000 - Jan 18, 2000 | -44.99% May 21, 2002 - Nov 18, 2005 |
| #5 | -4.76% Nov 12, 1999 - Nov 22, 1999 | -30.41% Oct 22, 2024 - Feb 10, 2025 |
| #6 | -4.45% Jan 24, 2000 - Jan 27, 2000 | -23.47% Oct 16, 2025 - Dec 22, 2025 |
| #7 | -4.04% Jan 18, 2000 - Jan 21, 2000 | -21.90% Feb 1, 2006 - Apr 17, 2006 |
| #8 | -3.28% Jan 31, 2000 - Feb 3, 2000 | -20.00% Jan 19, 2000 - Feb 9, 2000 |
| #9 | -2.21% Nov 1, 1999 - Nov 10, 1999 | -18.81% Apr 16, 2025 - Jun 2, 2025 |
| #10 | -0.87% Jan 27, 2000 - Jan 31, 2000 | -17.69% Feb 14, 2002 - Mar 20, 2002 |
| #11 | N/A | -12.39% Apr 1, 2025 - Apr 10, 2025 |
| #12 | N/A | -12.12% Nov 10, 1999 - Nov 24, 1999 |
| #13 | N/A | -11.84% Mar 27, 2002 - Apr 17, 2002 |
| #14 | N/A | -11.05% Jun 13, 2025 - Jul 22, 2025 |
| #15 | N/A | -10.52% Apr 26, 2002 - May 7, 2002 |
Correlation
Correlation between NMR and GFI is 0.09 which considered as a very weak or no correlation - the stocks move independently of each other.
Dividend Comparison (2000 - 2026)
NMR vs GFI dividend yield comparison.
| Year | NMR | GFI |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 1.61% | 4.17% |
| 2025 | 4.91% | 1.77% |
| 2024 | 4.29% | 2.94% |
| 2023 | 1.20% | 2.86% |
| 2022 | 3.86% | 3.40% |
| 2021 | 0.00% | 3.24% |
| 2020 | 0.86% | 1.72% |
| 2019 | 0.00% | 0.81% |
| 2018 | 0.00% | 1.61% |
| 2017 | 1.70% | 1.41% |
| 2016 | 1.79% | 1.35% |
| 2015 | 3.34% | 0.60% |
| 2014 | 2.44% | 0.72% |
| 2013 | 1.77% | 2.17% |
| 2012 | 1.28% | 3.88% |
| 2011 | 5.11% | 1.56% |
| 2010 | 1.37% | 0.88% |
| 2009 | 0.57% | 1.01% |
| 2008 | 2.85% | 2.38% |
| 2007 | 0.00% | 1.81% |
| 2006 | 2.36% | 1.16% |
| 2005 | 1.07% | 0.64% |
| 2004 | 1.08% | 0.95% |
| 2003 | 1.03% | 2.28% |
| 2002 | 1.05% | 1.95% |
| 2001 | 5.57% | 3.44% |
| 2000 | 6.49% | 0.76% |
Select Stocks to Compare
More Comparisons
Compare with similar stocks