NMR vs FIS
Comparison between Nomura Holdings Inc (NMR, Company) and Fidelity National Information Services Inc (FIS, Company).
NMR is from the Financial Services sector, while FIS is from the Technology sector.
5-Year PerformanceNMR has outperformed FIS, delivering a return of +11.8% compared to -20.2%
NMR vs FIS - Performance Comparison
Key Characteristics
Financial metrics and valuation ratios
NMR vs FIS - Historical Returns
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
NMR vs FIS - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
| Year | NMR | FIS |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | -5.92% | -33.12% |
| 2025 | +53.57% | -15.10% |
| 2024 | +35.63% | +34.94% |
| 2023 | +21.20% | -9.10% |
| 2022 | -12.30% | -39.09% |
| 2021 | -17.05% | -21.03% |
| 2020 | +3.34% | +2.16% |
| 2019 | +35.43% | +38.69% |
| 2018 | -36.95% | +10.78% |
| 2017 | -0.51% | +23.84% |
| 2016 | +10.26% | +28.10% |
| 2015 | +0.64% | -1.32% |
| 2014 | -23.82% | +19.39% |
| 2013 | +29.46% | +52.86% |
| 2012 | +92.81% | +33.62% |
| 2011 | -52.04% | -4.80% |
| 2010 | -14.33% | +15.87% |
| 2009 | -11.17% | +38.79% |
| 2008 | -49.10% | -26.00% |
| 2007 | -11.80% | +2.85% |
| 2006 | -1.99% | +7.53% |
| 2005 | +34.20% | +15.70% |
| 2004 | -14.69% | +8.46% |
| 2003 | +52.55% | +30.19% |
| 2002 | -13.30% | -30.26% |
| 2001 | -29.05% | +43.18% |
| 2000 | +2.57% | N/A |
| 1999 | +11.76% | N/A |
NMR vs FIS Drawdown Comparison
The maximum drawdown for NMR was -89.30%, occurring on Nov 23, 2011. This drawdown has not yet recovered.
The maximum drawdown for FIS was -68.65%, occurring on Apr 10, 2026. This drawdown has not yet recovered.
The current NMR drawdown is -61.02%. The current FIS drawdown is -68.55%.
| Rank | NMR | FIS |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | -89.30% Mar 31, 2000 - Nov 23, 2011 | -68.65% Apr 29, 2021 - Apr 10, 2026 |
| #2 | -20.52% Feb 11, 2000 - Mar 29, 2000 | -60.38% Jul 16, 2007 - Feb 1, 2011 |
| #3 | -11.59% Nov 26, 1999 - Jan 4, 2000 | -59.03% Jun 4, 2002 - Jan 19, 2006 |
| #4 | -11.04% Jan 4, 2000 - Jan 18, 2000 | -34.74% Feb 14, 2020 - Apr 29, 2021 |
| #5 | -4.76% Nov 12, 1999 - Nov 22, 1999 | -32.44% May 3, 2011 - Mar 26, 2012 |
| #6 | -4.45% Jan 24, 2000 - Jan 27, 2000 | -28.42% Sep 4, 2001 - Dec 24, 2001 |
| #7 | -4.04% Jan 18, 2000 - Jan 21, 2000 | -23.43% Nov 2, 2015 - May 10, 2016 |
| #8 | -3.28% Jan 31, 2000 - Feb 3, 2000 | -16.78% Mar 28, 2006 - Oct 26, 2006 |
| #9 | -2.21% Nov 1, 1999 - Nov 10, 1999 | -13.08% Sep 21, 2018 - Mar 21, 2019 |
| #10 | -0.87% Jan 27, 2000 - Jan 31, 2000 | -11.75% Jul 3, 2012 - Nov 6, 2012 |
| #11 | N/A | -10.10% Sep 5, 2014 - Oct 31, 2014 |
| #12 | N/A | -9.92% Aug 20, 2019 - Dec 27, 2019 |
| #13 | N/A | -9.86% Jan 26, 2018 - May 8, 2018 |
| #14 | N/A | -9.85% Mar 23, 2015 - Aug 12, 2015 |
| #15 | N/A | -9.44% Apr 23, 2002 - May 14, 2002 |
Correlation
Correlation between NMR and FIS is -0.54 which considered as a moderate negative correlation - the stocks show some tendency to move in opposite directions.
Dividend Comparison (2000 - 2026)
NMR vs FIS dividend yield comparison.
| Year | NMR | FIS |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 0.00% | 1.01% |
| 2025 | 4.91% | 2.41% |
| 2024 | 4.29% | 1.78% |
| 2023 | 1.20% | 3.46% |
| 2022 | 3.86% | 2.77% |
| 2021 | 0.00% | 1.43% |
| 2020 | 0.86% | 0.99% |
| 2019 | 0.00% | 1.01% |
| 2018 | 0.00% | 1.25% |
| 2017 | 1.70% | 1.23% |
| 2016 | 1.79% | 1.37% |
| 2015 | 3.34% | 1.72% |
| 2014 | 2.44% | 1.54% |
| 2013 | 1.77% | 1.64% |
| 2012 | 1.28% | 2.30% |
| 2011 | 5.11% | 0.75% |
| 2010 | 1.37% | 0.73% |
| 2009 | 0.57% | 0.85% |
| 2008 | 2.85% | 102.64% |
| 2007 | 0.00% | 0.48% |
| 2006 | 2.36% | 9.85% |
| 2005 | 1.07% | 0.49% |
| 2004 | 1.08% | 0.56% |
| 2003 | 1.03% | 0.30% |
| 2002 | 1.05% | 0.00% |
| 2001 | 5.57% | 0.00% |
| 2000 | 6.49% | 0.00% |
Select Stocks to Compare
More Comparisons
Compare with similar stocks