NMR vs FE
Comparison between Nomura Holdings Inc (NMR, Company) and Firstenergy Corp (FE, Company).
NMR is from the Financial Services sector, while FE is from the Utilities sector.
5-Year PerformanceNMR has outperformed FE, delivering a return of +18.3% compared to +9.5%
NMR vs FE - Performance Comparison
Key Characteristics
Financial metrics and valuation ratios
NMR vs FE - Historical Returns
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
NMR vs FE - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
| Year | NMR | FE |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | +17.82% | +11.51% |
| 2025 | +53.57% | +16.83% |
| 2024 | +35.63% | +10.99% |
| 2023 | +21.20% | -9.06% |
| 2022 | -12.30% | +5.72% |
| 2021 | -17.05% | +47.07% |
| 2020 | +3.34% | -32.72% |
| 2019 | +35.43% | +37.14% |
| 2018 | -36.95% | +27.00% |
| 2017 | -0.51% | +3.63% |
| 2016 | +10.26% | +2.63% |
| 2015 | +0.64% | -15.64% |
| 2014 | -23.82% | +25.76% |
| 2013 | +29.46% | -16.96% |
| 2012 | +92.81% | +2.36% |
| 2011 | -52.04% | +27.44% |
| 2010 | -14.33% | -16.15% |
| 2009 | -11.17% | -1.67% |
| 2008 | -49.10% | -30.14% |
| 2007 | -11.80% | +23.39% |
| 2006 | -1.99% | +24.67% |
| 2005 | +34.20% | +29.25% |
| 2004 | -14.69% | +16.16% |
| 2003 | +52.55% | +11.71% |
| 2002 | -13.30% | -1.86% |
| 2001 | -29.05% | +19.96% |
| 2000 | +2.57% | +51.92% |
| 1999 | +11.76% | -12.31% |
NMR vs FE Drawdown Comparison
The maximum drawdown for NMR was -89.30%, occurring on Nov 23, 2011. This drawdown has not yet recovered.
The maximum drawdown for FE was -55.72%, occurring on Mar 13, 2009. Recovery took 2815 trading sessions.
The current NMR drawdown is -51.19%. The current FE drawdown is -3.69%.
| Rank | NMR | FE |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | -89.30% Mar 31, 2000 - Nov 23, 2011 | -55.72% Jul 11, 2008 - Sep 17, 2019 |
| #2 | -20.52% Feb 11, 2000 - Mar 29, 2000 | -47.67% Feb 18, 2020 - Apr 6, 2022 |
| #3 | -11.59% Nov 26, 1999 - Jan 4, 2000 | -34.46% Mar 11, 2002 - May 27, 2003 |
| #4 | -11.04% Jan 4, 2000 - Jan 18, 2000 | -28.73% Nov 3, 1999 - Apr 24, 2000 |
| #5 | -4.76% Nov 12, 1999 - Nov 22, 1999 | -28.58% Apr 20, 2022 - Aug 28, 2024 |
| #6 | -4.45% Jan 24, 2000 - Jan 27, 2000 | -27.06% Jul 2, 2003 - Feb 3, 2004 |
| #7 | -4.04% Jan 18, 2000 - Jan 21, 2000 | -19.04% Dec 26, 2000 - Jun 18, 2001 |
| #8 | -3.28% Jan 31, 2000 - Feb 3, 2000 | -16.82% May 21, 2007 - Dec 5, 2007 |
| #9 | -2.21% Nov 1, 1999 - Nov 10, 1999 | -14.88% Aug 3, 2000 - Sep 13, 2000 |
| #10 | -0.87% Jan 27, 2000 - Jan 31, 2000 | -14.72% Apr 9, 2026 - May 15, 2026 |
| #11 | N/A | -13.01% Sep 4, 2024 - Aug 1, 2025 |
| #12 | N/A | -12.77% Jan 10, 2008 - Apr 23, 2008 |
| #13 | N/A | -12.42% Sep 9, 2005 - May 5, 2006 |
| #14 | N/A | -11.43% Oct 2, 2000 - Nov 16, 2000 |
| #15 | N/A | -11.33% Nov 12, 2004 - Apr 12, 2005 |
Correlation
Correlation between NMR and FE is -0.37 which considered as a weak negative correlation - the stocks show a slight tendency to move in opposite directions.
Dividend Comparison (1999 - 2026)
NMR vs FE dividend yield comparison.
| Year | NMR | FE |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 1.54% | 1.84% |
| 2025 | 4.91% | 3.93% |
| 2024 | 4.29% | 4.24% |
| 2023 | 1.20% | 4.31% |
| 2022 | 3.86% | 3.72% |
| 2021 | 0.00% | 3.75% |
| 2020 | 0.86% | 5.10% |
| 2019 | 0.00% | 3.13% |
| 2018 | 0.00% | 3.83% |
| 2017 | 1.70% | 4.70% |
| 2016 | 1.79% | 4.65% |
| 2015 | 3.34% | 4.54% |
| 2014 | 2.44% | 3.69% |
| 2013 | 1.77% | 6.67% |
| 2012 | 1.28% | 5.27% |
| 2011 | 5.11% | 7.45% |
| 2010 | 1.37% | 5.94% |
| 2009 | 0.57% | 4.74% |
| 2008 | 2.85% | 4.53% |
| 2007 | 0.00% | 2.76% |
| 2006 | 2.36% | 2.99% |
| 2005 | 1.07% | 3.40% |
| 2004 | 1.08% | 3.80% |
| 2003 | 1.03% | 4.26% |
| 2002 | 1.05% | 4.55% |
| 2001 | 5.57% | 4.29% |
| 2000 | 6.49% | 4.75% |
| 1999 | 0.00% | 1.65% |
Select Stocks to Compare
More Comparisons
Compare with similar stocks