StockComparison Logo
vs

NMR vs CTSH

Comparison between Nomura Holdings Inc (NMR, Company) and Cognizant Technology Solutions Corp - Class A (CTSH, Company).

NMR is from the Financial Services sector, while CTSH is from the Technology sector.

5-Year PerformanceNMR has outperformed CTSH, delivering a return of +11.8% compared to -5.6%

NMR vs CTSH - Performance Comparison

Key Characteristics

Financial metrics and valuation ratios

Market Cap
NMR
$24B
Winner
CTSH
$24B
Max Drawdown
NMR
91.09%
Winner
CTSH
71.38%
Sharpe Ratio
Winner
NMR
1.36
CTSH
-1.31
5Y Beta
NMR
1.24
Winner
CTSH
0.79
Industry
NMR
Capital Markets
CTSH
Information Technology Services
P/E Ratio
Winner
NMR
10.61
CTSH
11.07
Forward P/E
NMR
15.38
Winner
CTSH
9.08
PEG Ratio
Winner
NMR
0.10
CTSH
0.85
Dividend Yield
Winner
NMR
5.18%
CTSH
2.46%
5Y Dividends CAGR
Winner
NMR
65.12%
CTSH
11.77%
5Y EPS CAGR
Winner
NMR
14.57%
CTSH
10.11%
Debt to Equity
NMR
417.50%
Winner
CTSH
3.77%
Free Cash Flow Yield
NMR
-24.02%
Winner
CTSH
10.15%
P/S Ratio
Winner
NMR
0.01
CTSH
1.13
P/B Ratio
Winner
NMR
0.95
CTSH
1.63

NMR vs CTSH - Historical Returns

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

1M
Winner
NMR
-7.02%
CTSH
-15.28%
3M
Winner
NMR
-14.42%
CTSH
-30.38%
6M
Winner
NMR
+11.97%
CTSH
-28.74%
1Y
Winner
NMR
+46.41%
CTSH
-33.61%
5Y(CAGR)
Winner
NMR
+11.83%
CTSH
-5.65%
10Y(CAGR)
Winner
NMR
+9.03%
CTSH
-0.37%
Max(CAGR)
NMR
-0.76%
Winner
CTSH
+16.34%

NMR vs CTSH - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

YearNMRCTSH
2026-5.92%-36.10%
2025+53.57%+10.38%
2024+35.63%+5.04%
2023+21.20%+33.43%
2022-12.30%-35.16%
2021-17.05%+13.13%
2020+3.34%+34.18%
2019+35.43%-0.47%
2018-36.95%-9.57%
2017-0.51%+26.47%
2016+10.26%-3.61%
2015+0.64%+13.95%
2014-23.82%+6.56%
2013+29.46%+32.62%
2012+92.81%+12.42%
2011-52.04%-14.66%
2010-14.33%+56.60%
2009-11.17%+137.08%
2008-49.10%-43.97%
2007-11.80%-12.71%
2006-1.99%+52.28%
2005+34.20%+20.18%
2004-14.69%+79.90%
2003+52.55%+89.51%
2002-13.30%+88.30%
2001-29.05%+23.70%
2000+2.57%-24.36%
1999+11.76%+114.82%

NMR vs CTSH Drawdown Comparison

The maximum drawdown for NMR was -89.30%, occurring on Nov 23, 2011. This drawdown has not yet recovered.

The maximum drawdown for CTSH was -71.38%, occurring on Oct 8, 2001. Recovery took 653 trading sessions.

The current NMR drawdown is -61.02%. The current CTSH drawdown is -41.82%.

RankNMRCTSH
#1-89.30%
Mar 31, 2000 - Nov 23, 2011
-71.38%
Mar 28, 2000 - Nov 4, 2002
#2-20.52%
Feb 11, 2000 - Mar 29, 2000
-69.06%
Feb 7, 2007 - Jan 13, 2010
#3-11.59%
Nov 26, 1999 - Jan 4, 2000
-49.77%
Mar 15, 2018 - May 3, 2021
#4-11.04%
Jan 4, 2000 - Jan 18, 2000
-43.77%
Mar 22, 2022 - Feb 13, 2025
#5-4.76%
Nov 12, 1999 - Nov 22, 1999
-42.21%
Feb 14, 2025 - May 6, 2026
#6-4.45%
Jan 24, 2000 - Jan 27, 2000
-35.68%
Dec 22, 1999 - Feb 8, 2000
#7-4.04%
Jan 18, 2000 - Jan 21, 2000
-34.31%
Apr 29, 2011 - Sep 18, 2013
#8-3.28%
Jan 31, 2000 - Feb 3, 2000
-31.60%
Oct 28, 2015 - Jul 20, 2017
#9-2.21%
Nov 1, 1999 - Nov 10, 1999
-30.65%
Dec 23, 2002 - Jul 2, 2003
#10-0.87%
Jan 27, 2000 - Jan 31, 2000
-28.10%
Jan 23, 2004 - Sep 9, 2004
#11N/A-25.36%
Mar 9, 2000 - Mar 24, 2000
#12N/A-19.21%
Mar 7, 2014 - Nov 7, 2014
#13N/A-18.87%
May 3, 2021 - Nov 12, 2021
#14N/A-17.85%
Mar 4, 2005 - Jun 15, 2005
#15N/A-17.00%
Feb 11, 2000 - Mar 9, 2000

Correlation

Correlation between NMR and CTSH is -0.64 which considered as a moderate negative correlation - the stocks show some tendency to move in opposite directions.

-0.64
-101

Dividend Comparison (2000 - 2026)

NMR vs CTSH dividend yield comparison.

YearNMRCTSH
20260.00%0.64%
20254.91%1.49%
20244.29%1.56%
20231.20%1.54%
20223.86%1.89%
20210.00%1.08%
20200.86%1.07%
20190.00%1.29%
20180.00%1.26%
20171.70%0.63%
20161.79%0.00%
20153.34%0.00%
20142.44%0.00%
20131.77%0.00%
20121.28%0.00%
20115.11%0.00%
20101.37%0.00%
20090.57%0.00%
20082.85%0.00%
20062.36%0.00%
20051.07%0.00%
20041.08%0.00%
20031.03%0.00%
20021.05%0.00%
20015.57%0.00%
20006.49%0.00%

Select Stocks to Compare