NMR vs CTSH
Comparison between Nomura Holdings Inc (NMR, Company) and Cognizant Technology Solutions Corp - Class A (CTSH, Company).
NMR is from the Financial Services sector, while CTSH is from the Technology sector.
5-Year PerformanceNMR has outperformed CTSH, delivering a return of +11.8% compared to -5.6%
NMR vs CTSH - Performance Comparison
Key Characteristics
Financial metrics and valuation ratios
NMR vs CTSH - Historical Returns
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
NMR vs CTSH - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
| Year | NMR | CTSH |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | -5.92% | -36.10% |
| 2025 | +53.57% | +10.38% |
| 2024 | +35.63% | +5.04% |
| 2023 | +21.20% | +33.43% |
| 2022 | -12.30% | -35.16% |
| 2021 | -17.05% | +13.13% |
| 2020 | +3.34% | +34.18% |
| 2019 | +35.43% | -0.47% |
| 2018 | -36.95% | -9.57% |
| 2017 | -0.51% | +26.47% |
| 2016 | +10.26% | -3.61% |
| 2015 | +0.64% | +13.95% |
| 2014 | -23.82% | +6.56% |
| 2013 | +29.46% | +32.62% |
| 2012 | +92.81% | +12.42% |
| 2011 | -52.04% | -14.66% |
| 2010 | -14.33% | +56.60% |
| 2009 | -11.17% | +137.08% |
| 2008 | -49.10% | -43.97% |
| 2007 | -11.80% | -12.71% |
| 2006 | -1.99% | +52.28% |
| 2005 | +34.20% | +20.18% |
| 2004 | -14.69% | +79.90% |
| 2003 | +52.55% | +89.51% |
| 2002 | -13.30% | +88.30% |
| 2001 | -29.05% | +23.70% |
| 2000 | +2.57% | -24.36% |
| 1999 | +11.76% | +114.82% |
NMR vs CTSH Drawdown Comparison
The maximum drawdown for NMR was -89.30%, occurring on Nov 23, 2011. This drawdown has not yet recovered.
The maximum drawdown for CTSH was -71.38%, occurring on Oct 8, 2001. Recovery took 653 trading sessions.
The current NMR drawdown is -61.02%. The current CTSH drawdown is -41.82%.
| Rank | NMR | CTSH |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | -89.30% Mar 31, 2000 - Nov 23, 2011 | -71.38% Mar 28, 2000 - Nov 4, 2002 |
| #2 | -20.52% Feb 11, 2000 - Mar 29, 2000 | -69.06% Feb 7, 2007 - Jan 13, 2010 |
| #3 | -11.59% Nov 26, 1999 - Jan 4, 2000 | -49.77% Mar 15, 2018 - May 3, 2021 |
| #4 | -11.04% Jan 4, 2000 - Jan 18, 2000 | -43.77% Mar 22, 2022 - Feb 13, 2025 |
| #5 | -4.76% Nov 12, 1999 - Nov 22, 1999 | -42.21% Feb 14, 2025 - May 6, 2026 |
| #6 | -4.45% Jan 24, 2000 - Jan 27, 2000 | -35.68% Dec 22, 1999 - Feb 8, 2000 |
| #7 | -4.04% Jan 18, 2000 - Jan 21, 2000 | -34.31% Apr 29, 2011 - Sep 18, 2013 |
| #8 | -3.28% Jan 31, 2000 - Feb 3, 2000 | -31.60% Oct 28, 2015 - Jul 20, 2017 |
| #9 | -2.21% Nov 1, 1999 - Nov 10, 1999 | -30.65% Dec 23, 2002 - Jul 2, 2003 |
| #10 | -0.87% Jan 27, 2000 - Jan 31, 2000 | -28.10% Jan 23, 2004 - Sep 9, 2004 |
| #11 | N/A | -25.36% Mar 9, 2000 - Mar 24, 2000 |
| #12 | N/A | -19.21% Mar 7, 2014 - Nov 7, 2014 |
| #13 | N/A | -18.87% May 3, 2021 - Nov 12, 2021 |
| #14 | N/A | -17.85% Mar 4, 2005 - Jun 15, 2005 |
| #15 | N/A | -17.00% Feb 11, 2000 - Mar 9, 2000 |
Correlation
Correlation between NMR and CTSH is -0.64 which considered as a moderate negative correlation - the stocks show some tendency to move in opposite directions.
Dividend Comparison (2000 - 2026)
NMR vs CTSH dividend yield comparison.
| Year | NMR | CTSH |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 0.00% | 0.64% |
| 2025 | 4.91% | 1.49% |
| 2024 | 4.29% | 1.56% |
| 2023 | 1.20% | 1.54% |
| 2022 | 3.86% | 1.89% |
| 2021 | 0.00% | 1.08% |
| 2020 | 0.86% | 1.07% |
| 2019 | 0.00% | 1.29% |
| 2018 | 0.00% | 1.26% |
| 2017 | 1.70% | 0.63% |
| 2016 | 1.79% | 0.00% |
| 2015 | 3.34% | 0.00% |
| 2014 | 2.44% | 0.00% |
| 2013 | 1.77% | 0.00% |
| 2012 | 1.28% | 0.00% |
| 2011 | 5.11% | 0.00% |
| 2010 | 1.37% | 0.00% |
| 2009 | 0.57% | 0.00% |
| 2008 | 2.85% | 0.00% |
| 2006 | 2.36% | 0.00% |
| 2005 | 1.07% | 0.00% |
| 2004 | 1.08% | 0.00% |
| 2003 | 1.03% | 0.00% |
| 2002 | 1.05% | 0.00% |
| 2001 | 5.57% | 0.00% |
| 2000 | 6.49% | 0.00% |
Select Stocks to Compare
More Comparisons
Compare with similar stocks