NMR vs BG
Comparison between Nomura Holdings Inc (NMR, Company) and Bunge Global SA (BG, Company).
NMR is from the Financial Services sector, while BG is from the Consumer Defensive sector.
5-Year PerformanceNMR has outperformed BG, delivering a return of +11.8% compared to +10.9%
NMR vs BG - Performance Comparison
Key Characteristics
Financial metrics and valuation ratios
NMR vs BG - Historical Returns
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
NMR vs BG - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
| Year | NMR | BG |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | -1.18% | +41.11% |
| 2025 | +53.57% | +18.87% |
| 2024 | +35.63% | -21.19% |
| 2023 | +21.20% | +8.35% |
| 2022 | -12.30% | +8.87% |
| 2021 | -17.05% | +46.47% |
| 2020 | +3.34% | +18.89% |
| 2019 | +35.43% | +11.77% |
| 2018 | -36.95% | -19.10% |
| 2017 | -0.51% | -6.06% |
| 2016 | +10.26% | +10.99% |
| 2015 | +0.64% | -23.70% |
| 2014 | -23.82% | +12.73% |
| 2013 | +29.46% | +12.77% |
| 2012 | +92.81% | +25.73% |
| 2011 | -52.04% | -11.26% |
| 2010 | -14.33% | +2.96% |
| 2009 | -11.17% | +21.75% |
| 2008 | -49.10% | -57.18% |
| 2007 | -11.80% | +63.86% |
| 2006 | -1.99% | +27.45% |
| 2005 | +34.20% | +0.37% |
| 2004 | -14.69% | +74.90% |
| 2003 | +52.55% | +39.88% |
| 2002 | -13.30% | +6.09% |
| 2001 | -29.05% | +46.26% |
| 2000 | +2.57% | N/A |
| 1999 | +11.76% | N/A |
NMR vs BG Drawdown Comparison
The maximum drawdown for NMR was -89.30%, occurring on Nov 23, 2011. This drawdown has not yet recovered.
The maximum drawdown for BG was -77.34%, occurring on Oct 28, 2008. Recovery took 3524 trading sessions.
The current NMR drawdown is -59.06%. The current BG drawdown is -0.58%.
| Rank | NMR | BG |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | -89.30% Mar 31, 2000 - Nov 23, 2011 | -77.34% Jan 14, 2008 - Jan 11, 2022 |
| #2 | -20.52% Feb 11, 2000 - Mar 29, 2000 | -41.51% Apr 18, 2022 - Jan 27, 2026 |
| #3 | -11.59% Nov 26, 1999 - Jan 4, 2000 | -28.06% Jul 20, 2005 - Nov 9, 2006 |
| #4 | -11.04% Jan 4, 2000 - Jan 18, 2000 | -25.63% Dec 14, 2001 - Sep 26, 2002 |
| #5 | -4.76% Nov 12, 1999 - Nov 22, 1999 | -17.28% Apr 7, 2004 - Oct 15, 2004 |
| #6 | -4.45% Jan 24, 2000 - Jan 27, 2000 | -15.95% Nov 18, 2002 - Jan 9, 2003 |
| #7 | -4.04% Jan 18, 2000 - Jan 21, 2000 | -15.78% Feb 22, 2007 - Jul 2, 2007 |
| #8 | -3.28% Jan 31, 2000 - Feb 3, 2000 | -15.06% Sep 9, 2003 - Dec 12, 2003 |
| #9 | -2.21% Nov 1, 1999 - Nov 10, 1999 | -14.97% Jan 18, 2005 - May 18, 2005 |
| #10 | -0.87% Jan 27, 2000 - Jan 31, 2000 | -13.87% Aug 2, 2007 - Sep 10, 2007 |
| #11 | N/A | -13.78% Oct 3, 2001 - Nov 1, 2001 |
| #12 | N/A | -11.76% Oct 25, 2007 - Dec 3, 2007 |
| #13 | N/A | -10.23% Jan 17, 2003 - Apr 10, 2003 |
| #14 | N/A | -9.59% Aug 31, 2001 - Oct 3, 2001 |
| #15 | N/A | -9.41% Oct 3, 2002 - Oct 21, 2002 |
Correlation
Correlation between NMR and BG is -0.23 which considered as a very weak or no correlation - the stocks move independently of each other.
Dividend Comparison (2000 - 2026)
NMR vs BG dividend yield comparison.
| Year | NMR | BG |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 0.00% | 1.10% |
| 2025 | 4.91% | 3.12% |
| 2024 | 4.29% | 3.48% |
| 2023 | 1.20% | 2.55% |
| 2022 | 3.86% | 2.31% |
| 2021 | 0.00% | 2.76% |
| 2020 | 0.86% | 3.05% |
| 2019 | 0.00% | 3.48% |
| 2018 | 0.00% | 3.59% |
| 2017 | 1.70% | 2.62% |
| 2016 | 1.79% | 2.21% |
| 2015 | 3.34% | 2.11% |
| 2014 | 2.44% | 1.41% |
| 2013 | 1.77% | 1.39% |
| 2012 | 1.28% | 1.43% |
| 2011 | 5.11% | 1.68% |
| 2010 | 1.37% | 1.34% |
| 2009 | 0.57% | 1.25% |
| 2008 | 2.85% | 1.39% |
| 2007 | 0.00% | 0.57% |
| 2006 | 2.36% | 0.86% |
| 2005 | 1.07% | 0.99% |
| 2004 | 1.08% | 0.84% |
| 2003 | 1.03% | 1.28% |
| 2002 | 1.05% | 1.60% |
| 2001 | 5.57% | 0.41% |
| 2000 | 6.49% | 0.00% |
Select Stocks to Compare
More Comparisons
Compare with similar stocks