StockComparison Logo
vs

NG vs BTU

Comparison between Novagold Resources Inc (NG, Company) and Peabody Energy Corp New (BTU, Company).

NG is from the Basic Materials sector, while BTU is from the Energy sector.

5-Year PerformanceBTU has outperformed NG, delivering a return of +14.9% compared to -5.3%

NG vs BTU - Performance Comparison

Key Characteristics

Financial metrics and valuation ratios

Market Cap
Winner
NG
$2.54B
BTU
$2.54B
Max Drawdown
Winner
NG
97.85%
BTU
98.25%
Sharpe Ratio
NG
0.51
Winner
BTU
0.76
5Y Beta
NG
1.43
Winner
BTU
0.79
Industry
NG
Gold
BTU
Thermal Coal
P/E Ratio
NG
-21.71
Winner
BTU
-26.50
Forward P/E
Winner
NG
4.90
BTU
24.69
PEG Ratio
Winner
NG
-0.18
BTU
0.00
Dividend Yield
NG
N/A
BTU
1.40%
Debt to Equity
NG
0.00%
BTU
0.00%
Free Cash Flow Yield
Winner
NG
-0.53%
BTU
-6.60%
P/S Ratio
NG
3615.48
Winner
BTU
0.73
P/B Ratio
NG
6.07
Winner
BTU
0.81

NG vs BTU - Historical Returns

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

1M
NG
-7.76%
Winner
BTU
-2.29%
3M
NG
-25.28%
Winner
BTU
-17.58%
6M
Winner
NG
-35.15%
BTU
-37.81%
1Y
NG
+8.39%
Winner
BTU
+31.84%
5Y(CAGR)
NG
-5.28%
Winner
BTU
+14.88%
10Y(CAGR)
Winner
NG
-1.57%
BTU
-2.18%
Max(CAGR)
Winner
NG
+1.58%
BTU
-2.18%

NG vs BTU - Annual Returns (2003 - 2026)

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

YearNGBTU
2026-35.43%-28.59%
2025+171.72%+44.81%
2024-12.37%-13.07%
2023-38.18%-2.16%
2022-10.34%+132.98%
2021-33.72%+242.52%
2020+9.39%-75.88%
2019+126.26%-67.95%
2018-2.71%-21.75%
2017-14.38%+27.00%
2016+5.80%N/A
2015+35.81%N/A
2014+6.12%N/A
2013-47.41%N/A
2012-39.61%N/A
2011-39.86%N/A
2010+125.79%N/A
2009+287.97%N/A
2008-83.39%N/A
2007-49.78%N/A
2006+80.63%N/A
2005+24.66%N/A
2004+52.26%N/A
2003-1.97%N/A

NG vs BTU Drawdown Comparison

The maximum drawdown for NG was -97.85%, occurring on Dec 2, 2008. This drawdown has not yet recovered.

The maximum drawdown for BTU was -98.07%, occurring on Nov 10, 2020. This drawdown has not yet recovered.

The current NG drawdown is -65.36%. The current BTU drawdown is -47.10%.

RankNGBTU
#1-97.85%
Nov 9, 2007 - Dec 2, 2008
-98.07%
Jun 14, 2018 - Nov 10, 2020
#2-42.01%
Jan 9, 2004 - Sep 13, 2004
-25.77%
Apr 3, 2017 - Nov 1, 2017
#3-35.40%
May 2, 2006 - Jul 26, 2006
-13.95%
Feb 15, 2018 - May 17, 2018
#4-28.87%
Feb 23, 2005 - Jan 9, 2006
-8.07%
Jan 26, 2018 - Feb 14, 2018
#5-23.92%
Sep 1, 2006 - Oct 10, 2007
-3.03%
May 21, 2018 - May 30, 2018
#6-17.75%
Nov 29, 2004 - Feb 10, 2005
-2.54%
Nov 6, 2017 - Nov 20, 2017
#7-14.56%
Dec 8, 2003 - Jan 5, 2004
-2.54%
Jan 12, 2018 - Jan 26, 2018
#8-12.96%
Mar 3, 2006 - Mar 29, 2006
-2.20%
Jun 7, 2018 - Jun 14, 2018
#9-12.24%
Oct 15, 2007 - Oct 25, 2007
-2.12%
Dec 1, 2017 - Dec 7, 2017
#10-9.99%
Apr 5, 2006 - May 2, 2006
-0.99%
Dec 28, 2017 - Jan 5, 2018
#11-9.02%
Feb 6, 2006 - Feb 24, 2006
-0.97%
Dec 26, 2017 - Dec 28, 2017
#12-7.06%
Jan 13, 2006 - Jan 26, 2006
-0.89%
Dec 13, 2017 - Dec 18, 2017
#13-5.38%
Sep 23, 2004 - Oct 5, 2004
-0.89%
Nov 24, 2017 - Nov 28, 2017
#14-4.81%
Oct 29, 2007 - Nov 2, 2007
-0.84%
May 17, 2018 - May 21, 2018
#15-4.38%
Oct 25, 2004 - Nov 3, 2004
-0.57%
Nov 1, 2017 - Nov 6, 2017

Correlation

Correlation between NG and BTU is -0.53 which considered as a moderate negative correlation - the stocks show some tendency to move in opposite directions.

-0.53
-101

Dividend Comparison (2012 - 2026)

NG vs BTU dividend yield comparison.

YearNGBTU
20260.00%0.69%
20250.00%1.01%
20240.00%1.43%
20230.00%0.93%
20190.00%26.43%
20180.00%1.59%
201215.52%0.00%

Select Stocks to Compare