NG vs BTU
Comparison between Novagold Resources Inc (NG, Company) and Peabody Energy Corp New (BTU, Company).
NG is from the Basic Materials sector, while BTU is from the Energy sector.
5-Year PerformanceBTU has outperformed NG, delivering a return of +14.9% compared to -5.3%
NG vs BTU - Performance Comparison
Key Characteristics
Financial metrics and valuation ratios
NG vs BTU - Historical Returns
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
NG vs BTU - Annual Returns (2003 - 2026)
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
| Year | NG | BTU |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | -35.43% | -28.59% |
| 2025 | +171.72% | +44.81% |
| 2024 | -12.37% | -13.07% |
| 2023 | -38.18% | -2.16% |
| 2022 | -10.34% | +132.98% |
| 2021 | -33.72% | +242.52% |
| 2020 | +9.39% | -75.88% |
| 2019 | +126.26% | -67.95% |
| 2018 | -2.71% | -21.75% |
| 2017 | -14.38% | +27.00% |
| 2016 | +5.80% | N/A |
| 2015 | +35.81% | N/A |
| 2014 | +6.12% | N/A |
| 2013 | -47.41% | N/A |
| 2012 | -39.61% | N/A |
| 2011 | -39.86% | N/A |
| 2010 | +125.79% | N/A |
| 2009 | +287.97% | N/A |
| 2008 | -83.39% | N/A |
| 2007 | -49.78% | N/A |
| 2006 | +80.63% | N/A |
| 2005 | +24.66% | N/A |
| 2004 | +52.26% | N/A |
| 2003 | -1.97% | N/A |
NG vs BTU Drawdown Comparison
The maximum drawdown for NG was -97.85%, occurring on Dec 2, 2008. This drawdown has not yet recovered.
The maximum drawdown for BTU was -98.07%, occurring on Nov 10, 2020. This drawdown has not yet recovered.
The current NG drawdown is -65.36%. The current BTU drawdown is -47.10%.
| Rank | NG | BTU |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | -97.85% Nov 9, 2007 - Dec 2, 2008 | -98.07% Jun 14, 2018 - Nov 10, 2020 |
| #2 | -42.01% Jan 9, 2004 - Sep 13, 2004 | -25.77% Apr 3, 2017 - Nov 1, 2017 |
| #3 | -35.40% May 2, 2006 - Jul 26, 2006 | -13.95% Feb 15, 2018 - May 17, 2018 |
| #4 | -28.87% Feb 23, 2005 - Jan 9, 2006 | -8.07% Jan 26, 2018 - Feb 14, 2018 |
| #5 | -23.92% Sep 1, 2006 - Oct 10, 2007 | -3.03% May 21, 2018 - May 30, 2018 |
| #6 | -17.75% Nov 29, 2004 - Feb 10, 2005 | -2.54% Nov 6, 2017 - Nov 20, 2017 |
| #7 | -14.56% Dec 8, 2003 - Jan 5, 2004 | -2.54% Jan 12, 2018 - Jan 26, 2018 |
| #8 | -12.96% Mar 3, 2006 - Mar 29, 2006 | -2.20% Jun 7, 2018 - Jun 14, 2018 |
| #9 | -12.24% Oct 15, 2007 - Oct 25, 2007 | -2.12% Dec 1, 2017 - Dec 7, 2017 |
| #10 | -9.99% Apr 5, 2006 - May 2, 2006 | -0.99% Dec 28, 2017 - Jan 5, 2018 |
| #11 | -9.02% Feb 6, 2006 - Feb 24, 2006 | -0.97% Dec 26, 2017 - Dec 28, 2017 |
| #12 | -7.06% Jan 13, 2006 - Jan 26, 2006 | -0.89% Dec 13, 2017 - Dec 18, 2017 |
| #13 | -5.38% Sep 23, 2004 - Oct 5, 2004 | -0.89% Nov 24, 2017 - Nov 28, 2017 |
| #14 | -4.81% Oct 29, 2007 - Nov 2, 2007 | -0.84% May 17, 2018 - May 21, 2018 |
| #15 | -4.38% Oct 25, 2004 - Nov 3, 2004 | -0.57% Nov 1, 2017 - Nov 6, 2017 |
Correlation
Correlation between NG and BTU is -0.53 which considered as a moderate negative correlation - the stocks show some tendency to move in opposite directions.
Dividend Comparison (2012 - 2026)
NG vs BTU dividend yield comparison.
| Year | NG | BTU |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 0.00% | 0.69% |
| 2025 | 0.00% | 1.01% |
| 2024 | 0.00% | 1.43% |
| 2023 | 0.00% | 0.93% |
| 2019 | 0.00% | 26.43% |
| 2018 | 0.00% | 1.59% |
| 2012 | 15.52% | 0.00% |
Select Stocks to Compare
More Comparisons
Compare with similar stocks