NCA vs SMB
Comparison between Nuveen California Municipal Value Fund. (NCA, ETF) and VANECK SHORT MUNI ETF (SMB, ETF).
5-Year PerformanceSMB has outperformed NCA, delivering a return of +1.2% compared to +1.2%
NCA vs SMB - Performance Comparison
Key Characteristics
Financial metrics and valuation ratios
NCA vs SMB - Historical Returns
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
NCA vs SMB - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
| Year | NCA | SMB |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | +3.85% | +0.55% |
| 2025 | +10.13% | +4.55% |
| 2024 | -0.80% | +2.47% |
| 2023 | +8.96% | +3.14% |
| 2022 | -13.22% | -4.35% |
| 2021 | -2.16% | +0.06% |
| 2020 | +4.73% | +3.36% |
| 2019 | +19.52% | +4.48% |
| 2018 | -7.83% | +1.75% |
| 2017 | +1.75% | +0.69% |
| 2016 | +0.41% | -0.39% |
| 2015 | +8.06% | +1.20% |
| 2014 | +19.53% | +1.09% |
| 2013 | -5.95% | +0.53% |
| 2012 | +10.54% | +1.47% |
| 2011 | +16.12% | +5.37% |
| 2010 | +0.45% | +1.32% |
| 2009 | +10.05% | +7.86% |
| 2008 | -3.00% | +2.14% |
| 2007 | -5.56% | N/A |
| 2006 | +12.17% | N/A |
| 2005 | +9.35% | N/A |
| 2004 | +6.39% | N/A |
| 2003 | +3.67% | N/A |
| 2002 | +1.42% | N/A |
| 2001 | +11.60% | N/A |
| 2000 | +21.02% | N/A |
| 1999 | -8.03% | N/A |
NCA vs SMB Drawdown Comparison
The maximum drawdown for NCA was -23.58%, occurring on Oct 10, 2008. Recovery took 580 trading sessions.
The maximum drawdown for SMB was -12.64%, occurring on Mar 19, 2020. Recovery took 65 trading sessions.
The current NCA drawdown is -4.95%. The current SMB drawdown is -0.19%.
| Rank | NCA | SMB |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | -23.58% May 15, 2007 - Sep 1, 2009 | -12.64% Mar 9, 2020 - Jun 10, 2020 |
| #2 | -22.97% Sep 16, 2021 - Jan 7, 2026 | -7.48% Jul 20, 2021 - Aug 20, 2024 |
| #3 | -19.28% Mar 3, 2020 - Sep 14, 2020 | -5.58% Sep 11, 2008 - Jan 6, 2009 |
| #4 | -14.95% Jan 24, 2013 - Apr 25, 2014 | -4.11% Aug 26, 2010 - May 17, 2011 |
| #5 | -14.28% Sep 2, 2010 - Nov 9, 2011 | -4.10% Aug 2, 2016 - Aug 4, 2017 |
| #6 | -13.49% Sep 22, 2016 - Jul 9, 2019 | -4.07% May 1, 2013 - Feb 14, 2014 |
| #7 | -13.48% Nov 2, 1999 - Mar 30, 2000 | -3.84% Jan 29, 2009 - May 22, 2009 |
| #8 | -12.31% Jun 26, 2003 - Feb 12, 2004 | -2.46% Aug 30, 2017 - Dec 24, 2018 |
| #9 | -12.29% Feb 17, 2004 - Nov 16, 2004 | -2.37% Apr 10, 2008 - Aug 12, 2008 |
| #10 | -10.28% Sep 30, 2002 - Jun 12, 2003 | -1.96% Oct 2, 2009 - Nov 27, 2009 |
| #11 | -9.19% Jan 20, 2021 - Jul 29, 2021 | -1.80% Feb 28, 2025 - May 23, 2025 |
| #12 | -8.33% Mar 30, 2000 - Jun 9, 2000 | -1.79% Feb 5, 2015 - Oct 16, 2015 |
| #13 | -7.94% Mar 7, 2001 - Jul 23, 2001 | -1.62% May 22, 2009 - Jul 13, 2009 |
| #14 | -7.88% Mar 1, 2012 - May 4, 2012 | -1.53% Jan 8, 2009 - Jan 12, 2009 |
| #15 | -7.72% Aug 10, 2000 - Jan 4, 2001 | -1.49% Mar 12, 2010 - May 26, 2010 |
Correlation
Correlation between NCA and SMB is 0.95 which considered as a very strong positive correlation - the stocks move almost identically together.
Dividend Comparison (2000 - 2026)
NCA vs SMB dividend yield comparison.
| Year | NCA | SMB |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 1.61% | 1.13% |
| 2025 | 3.89% | 2.63% |
| 2024 | 4.12% | 2.38% |
| 2023 | 3.88% | 1.83% |
| 2022 | 3.66% | 1.32% |
| 2021 | 3.02% | 1.24% |
| 2020 | 2.98% | 1.50% |
| 2019 | 3.21% | 1.58% |
| 2018 | 3.79% | 1.49% |
| 2017 | 5.33% | 1.23% |
| 2016 | 4.36% | 1.12% |
| 2015 | 4.34% | 1.13% |
| 2014 | 4.45% | 1.21% |
| 2013 | 5.11% | 1.38% |
| 2012 | 4.69% | 1.64% |
| 2011 | 4.81% | 1.93% |
| 2010 | 5.32% | 2.40% |
| 2009 | 5.03% | 2.38% |
| 2008 | 6.90% | 2.34% |
| 2007 | 5.13% | 0.00% |
| 2006 | 4.78% | 0.00% |
| 2005 | 5.39% | 0.00% |
| 2004 | 6.01% | 0.00% |
| 2003 | 5.97% | 0.00% |
| 2002 | 5.49% | 0.00% |
| 2001 | 5.17% | 0.00% |
| 2000 | 2.31% | 0.00% |
Select Stocks to Compare
More Comparisons
Compare with similar stocks