StockComparison Logo
vs

NCA vs BSMS

Comparison between Nuveen California Municipal Value Fund. (NCA, ETF) and INVESCO BULLETSHARES 2028 MUNICIPAL BOND ETF (BSMS, ETF).

5-Year PerformanceNCA has outperformed BSMS, delivering a return of +1.2% compared to -0.1%

NCA vs BSMS - Performance Comparison

Key Characteristics

Financial metrics and valuation ratios

Net Assets
Winner
NCA
$308M
BSMS
$307M
Expense Ratio
NCA
N/A
BSMS
0.18%
Max Drawdown
NCA
31.70%
Winner
BSMS
16.51%
Sharpe Ratio
Winner
NCA
0.70
BSMS
0.18
5Y Beta
NCA
0.14
Winner
BSMS
0.01
5Y Dividends CAGR
NCA
3.86%
Winner
BSMS
9.58%

NCA vs BSMS - Historical Returns

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

1M
Winner
NCA
+0.98%
BSMS
+0.07%
3M
Winner
NCA
+0.86%
BSMS
+0.50%
6M
NCA
-0.01%
Winner
BSMS
+0.72%
1Y
Winner
NCA
+13.13%
BSMS
+4.01%
5Y(CAGR)
Winner
NCA
+1.22%
BSMS
-0.10%
10Y(CAGR)
NCA
+1.82%
BSMS
N/A
Max(CAGR)
Winner
NCA
+4.91%
BSMS
+1.21%

NCA vs BSMS - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

YearNCABSMS
2026+4.86%+1.13%
2025+10.13%+3.52%
2024-0.80%+1.13%
2023+8.96%+4.78%
2022-13.22%-9.86%
2021-2.16%+1.34%
2020+4.73%+6.50%
2019+19.52%+0.22%
2018-7.83%N/A
2017+1.75%N/A
2016+0.41%N/A
2015+8.06%N/A
2014+19.53%N/A
2013-5.95%N/A
2012+10.54%N/A
2011+16.12%N/A
2010+0.45%N/A
2009+10.05%N/A
2008-3.00%N/A
2007-5.56%N/A
2006+12.17%N/A
2005+9.35%N/A
2004+6.39%N/A
2003+3.67%N/A
2002+1.42%N/A
2001+11.60%N/A
2000+21.02%N/A
1999-8.03%N/A

NCA vs BSMS Drawdown Comparison

The maximum drawdown for NCA was -23.58%, occurring on Oct 10, 2008. Recovery took 580 trading sessions.

The maximum drawdown for BSMS was -14.95%, occurring on Oct 31, 2022. This drawdown has not yet recovered.

The current NCA drawdown is -4.02%. The current BSMS drawdown is -0.75%.

RankNCABSMS
#1-23.58%
May 15, 2007 - Sep 1, 2009
-14.95%
Jul 19, 2021 - Oct 31, 2022
#2-22.97%
Sep 16, 2021 - Jan 7, 2026
-14.01%
Feb 27, 2020 - Jul 16, 2020
#3-19.28%
Mar 3, 2020 - Sep 14, 2020
-2.92%
Feb 12, 2021 - Jun 8, 2021
#4-14.95%
Jan 24, 2013 - Apr 25, 2014
-2.40%
Aug 10, 2020 - Nov 25, 2020
#5-14.28%
Sep 2, 2010 - Nov 9, 2011
-1.09%
Sep 26, 2019 - Dec 3, 2019
#6-13.49%
Sep 22, 2016 - Jul 9, 2019
-0.66%
Jun 10, 2021 - Jul 7, 2021
#7-13.48%
Nov 2, 1999 - Mar 30, 2000
-0.55%
Jan 6, 2021 - Jan 28, 2021
#8-12.31%
Jun 26, 2003 - Feb 12, 2004
-0.43%
Jan 31, 2020 - Feb 18, 2020
#9-12.29%
Feb 17, 2004 - Nov 16, 2004
-0.39%
Jul 16, 2020 - Jul 20, 2020
#10-10.28%
Sep 30, 2002 - Jun 12, 2003
-0.32%
Dec 4, 2019 - Dec 18, 2019
#11-9.19%
Jan 20, 2021 - Jul 29, 2021
-0.23%
Dec 18, 2019 - Jan 2, 2020
#12-8.33%
Mar 30, 2000 - Jun 9, 2000
-0.16%
Jan 17, 2020 - Jan 31, 2020
#13-7.94%
Mar 7, 2001 - Jul 23, 2001
-0.13%
Nov 25, 2020 - Dec 7, 2020
#14-7.88%
Mar 1, 2012 - May 4, 2012
-0.13%
Jul 8, 2021 - Jul 14, 2021
#15-7.72%
Aug 10, 2000 - Jan 4, 2001
-0.11%
Dec 29, 2020 - Jan 4, 2021

Correlation

Correlation between NCA and BSMS is 0.90 which considered as a strong positive correlation - the stocks tend to move together.

0.90
-101

Dividend Comparison (2000 - 2026)

NCA vs BSMS dividend yield comparison.

YearNCABSMS
20262.25%1.62%
20253.89%2.79%
20244.12%2.81%
20233.88%2.58%
20223.66%1.56%
20213.02%1.49%
20202.98%1.61%
20193.21%0.46%
20183.79%0.00%
20175.33%0.00%
20164.36%0.00%
20154.34%0.00%
20144.45%0.00%
20135.11%0.00%
20124.69%0.00%
20114.81%0.00%
20105.32%0.00%
20095.03%0.00%
20086.90%0.00%
20075.13%0.00%
20064.78%0.00%
20055.39%0.00%
20046.01%0.00%
20035.97%0.00%
20025.49%0.00%
20015.17%0.00%
20002.31%0.00%

Select Stocks to Compare