NAN vs EWM

Comparison between Nuveen New York Quality Municipal Income Fund (NAN, ETF) and ISHARES MSCI MALAYSIA ETF (EWM, ETF).

5-Year PerformanceEWM has outperformed NAN, delivering a return of +4.4% compared to +0.4%

NAN vs EWM - Performance Comparison

Log

Key Characteristics

Financial metrics and valuation ratios

Metric	NAN(ETF)	EWM(ETF)
Net Assets	$367M	$367M
Expense Ratio	N/A	0.50%
Max Drawdown	52.20%	71.46%
Sharpe Ratio	0.76	1.11
5Y Beta	0.15	0.48
5Y Dividends CAGR	8.45%	10.09%

Net Assets

Winner

NAN

$367M

EWM

$367M

Expense Ratio

NAN

N/A

EWM

0.50%

Max Drawdown

Winner

NAN

52.20%

EWM

71.46%

Sharpe Ratio

NAN

0.76

Winner

EWM

1.11

5Y Beta

Winner

NAN

0.15

EWM

0.48

5Y Dividends CAGR

NAN

8.45%

Winner

EWM

10.09%

NAN vs EWM - Historical Returns

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

Period	NAN	EWM
1 month	+1.43%	-6.56%
3 months	+1.73%	-2.21%
6 months	+3.31%	+6.43%
1 year	+9.58%	+19.11%
5 years(CAGR)	+0.43%	+4.44%
10 years(CAGR)	+2.39%	+2.39%
Max(CAGR)	+4.99%	+5.31%

Winner

NAN

+1.43%

EWM

-6.56%

Winner

NAN

+1.73%

EWM

-2.21%

NAN

+3.31%

Winner

EWM

+6.43%

NAN

+9.58%

Winner

EWM

+19.11%

5Y(CAGR)

NAN

+0.43%

Winner

EWM

+4.44%

10Y(CAGR)

Winner

NAN

+2.39%

EWM

+2.39%

Max(CAGR)

NAN

+4.99%

Winner

EWM

+5.31%

NAN vs EWM - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

Year	NAN	EWM
2026	+4.83%	+1.79%
2025	+5.91%	+16.66%
2024	+10.20%	+20.51%
2023	+7.05%	-2.49%
2022	-23.18%	-5.72%
2021	+8.93%	-6.13%
2020	+3.55%	+1.74%
2019	+19.54%	-1.18%
2018	-7.08%	-7.09%
2017	+8.29%	+24.23%
2016	+0.31%	-0.83%
2015	+11.41%	-18.80%
2014	+12.81%	-9.26%
2013	-13.50%	+7.09%
2012	+12.99%	+13.35%
2011	+16.03%	-3.80%
2010	+5.40%	+34.92%
2009	+36.13%	+44.85%
2008	-25.46%	-39.09%
2007	-9.86%	+41.48%
2006	+0.39%	+36.15%
2005	+14.67%	+0.85%
2004	+3.72%	+14.35%
2003	+15.05%	+29.61%
2002	+10.82%	+1.25%
2001	+6.42%	+6.98%
2000	+8.59%	-31.70%
1999	-9.22%	+29.88%

NAN vs EWM Drawdown Comparison

The maximum drawdown for NAN was -44.95%, occurring on Oct 10, 2008. Recovery took 767 trading sessions.

The maximum drawdown for EWM was -52.14%, occurring on Oct 27, 2008. Recovery took 661 trading sessions.

The current NAN drawdown is -1.65%. The current EWM drawdown is -9.88%.

Rank	NAN	EWM
#1	-44.95% Feb 7, 2007 - Feb 24, 2010	-52.14% Jan 14, 2008 - Aug 27, 2010
#2	-34.64% Aug 18, 2021 - Oct 25, 2023	-51.81% Jan 18, 2000 - Jul 21, 2005
#3	-24.81% Mar 5, 2020 - Dec 8, 2020	-50.35% Aug 27, 2014 - Mar 19, 2020
#4	-21.32% Dec 5, 2012 - Nov 20, 2015	-22.25% Jul 7, 2011 - Sep 14, 2012
#5	-17.70% Mar 1, 2004 - Jan 14, 2005	-18.11% Feb 23, 2007 - Apr 3, 2007
#6	-15.65% Jul 27, 2016 - Jun 14, 2019	-16.67% Jan 3, 2000 - Jan 13, 2000
#7	-14.48% Nov 2, 1999 - Dec 29, 2000	-16.57% May 18, 2007 - Oct 5, 2007
#8	-13.00% Nov 9, 2010 - Nov 7, 2011	-16.13% May 14, 2013 - Jul 2, 2014
#9	-9.86% Jun 30, 2003 - Dec 29, 2003	-13.60% May 10, 2006 - Nov 2, 2006
#10	-8.45% Oct 1, 2002 - Apr 28, 2003	-8.42% Aug 9, 2005 - Feb 3, 2006
#11	-8.11% Mar 1, 2006 - Jan 19, 2007	-7.80% Jan 17, 2013 - Apr 9, 2013
#12	-7.75% Sep 20, 2005 - Dec 23, 2005	-7.63% Oct 31, 2007 - Dec 6, 2007
#13	-7.00% Feb 27, 2002 - Jun 5, 2002	-7.04% Jan 13, 2011 - Apr 1, 2011
#14	-6.48% Nov 16, 2001 - Feb 22, 2002	-6.00% Dec 6, 2007 - Jan 3, 2008
#15	-6.03% Jan 25, 2005 - Apr 27, 2005	-5.42% Nov 4, 2010 - Dec 29, 2010

Correlation

Correlation between NAN and EWM is 0.75 which considered as a strong positive correlation - the stocks tend to move together.

0.75

-101

Dividend Comparison (2000 - 2026)

NAN vs EWM dividend yield comparison.

Year	NAN	EWM
2026	3.14%	0.00%
2025	7.67%	3.41%
2024	6.45%	3.32%
2023	4.12%	3.47%
2022	5.27%	3.00%
2021	4.15%	6.48%
2020	4.30%	1.89%
2019	4.06%	2.91%
2018	4.79%	3.84%
2017	5.13%	5.58%
2016	5.74%	5.97%
2015	5.54%	37.54%
2014	5.59%	4.03%
2013	5.96%	3.03%
2012	4.92%	1.58%
2011	5.10%	4.46%
2010	6.36%	2.40%
2009	5.62%	2.30%
2008	8.34%	5.21%
2007	6.03%	3.19%
2006	6.00%	2.15%
2005	6.99%	4.23%
2004	6.37%	2.20%
2003	6.05%	1.61%
2002	5.86%	1.86%
2001	5.69%	1.48%
2000	2.41%	1.35%