MUC vs FALN
Comparison between BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund Inc (MUC, ETF) and ISHARES FALLEN ANGELS USD BOND ETF (FALN, ETF).
5-Year PerformanceFALN has outperformed MUC, delivering a return of +3.6% compared to -2.9%
MUC vs FALN - Performance Comparison
Key Characteristics
Financial metrics and valuation ratios
MUC vs FALN - Historical Returns
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
MUC vs FALN - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
| Year | MUC | FALN |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | +3.73% | +2.57% |
| 2025 | +5.06% | +8.60% |
| 2024 | -0.22% | +8.18% |
| 2023 | +6.36% | +13.36% |
| 2022 | -26.65% | -13.60% |
| 2021 | +7.66% | +5.67% |
| 2020 | +11.26% | +14.54% |
| 2019 | +15.59% | +17.52% |
| 2018 | -9.31% | -5.26% |
| 2017 | +5.46% | +8.15% |
| 2016 | -0.74% | +10.41% |
| 2015 | +8.38% | N/A |
| 2014 | +15.67% | N/A |
| 2013 | -15.76% | N/A |
| 2012 | +17.11% | N/A |
| 2011 | +22.69% | N/A |
| 2010 | +10.03% | N/A |
| 2009 | +39.89% | N/A |
| 2008 | -25.56% | N/A |
| 2007 | -6.32% | N/A |
| 2006 | -2.10% | N/A |
| 2005 | +17.14% | N/A |
| 2004 | +4.62% | N/A |
| 2003 | +10.98% | N/A |
| 2002 | +3.74% | N/A |
| 2001 | +17.09% | N/A |
| 2000 | +11.28% | N/A |
| 1999 | -5.52% | N/A |
MUC vs FALN Drawdown Comparison
The maximum drawdown for MUC was -48.88%, occurring on Dec 16, 2008. Recovery took 695 trading sessions.
The maximum drawdown for FALN was -29.22%, occurring on Mar 20, 2020. Recovery took 106 trading sessions.
The current MUC drawdown is -16.07%. The current FALN drawdown is -0.26%.
| Rank | MUC | FALN |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | -48.88% Dec 4, 2006 - Sep 9, 2009 | -29.22% Feb 14, 2020 - Jul 17, 2020 |
| #2 | -38.29% Nov 9, 2021 - Oct 25, 2023 | -18.79% Nov 9, 2021 - Jun 5, 2024 |
| #3 | -24.55% Nov 30, 2012 - Nov 2, 2015 | -8.18% Jan 24, 2018 - Mar 1, 2019 |
| #4 | -23.84% Mar 6, 2020 - Jul 21, 2020 | -5.92% Feb 28, 2025 - Jun 9, 2025 |
| #5 | -17.06% Sep 28, 2016 - Aug 7, 2019 | -4.10% Oct 19, 2016 - Dec 7, 2016 |
| #6 | -16.37% Apr 5, 2000 - Sep 12, 2000 | -3.96% Feb 19, 2026 - Jun 11, 2026 |
| #7 | -14.63% Aug 31, 2010 - Aug 15, 2011 | -3.23% Sep 2, 2020 - Oct 12, 2020 |
| #8 | -14.52% Mar 15, 2004 - Sep 20, 2004 | -3.17% Jun 23, 2016 - Jun 30, 2016 |
| #9 | -12.60% Nov 17, 1999 - Mar 31, 2000 | -2.84% Feb 12, 2021 - May 3, 2021 |
| #10 | -10.76% May 15, 2006 - Sep 27, 2006 | -2.61% Sep 6, 2016 - Sep 30, 2016 |
| #11 | -10.65% Oct 8, 2009 - Mar 29, 2010 | -2.51% Mar 1, 2017 - Apr 7, 2017 |
| #12 | -10.34% Feb 22, 2002 - Jul 9, 2002 | -2.24% May 6, 2019 - Jun 19, 2019 |
| #13 | -8.94% Sep 12, 2000 - Jan 3, 2001 | -2.23% Sep 15, 2021 - Nov 5, 2021 |
| #14 | -8.34% Jun 16, 2003 - Jan 13, 2004 | -2.03% Dec 6, 2024 - Jan 27, 2025 |
| #15 | -7.38% Oct 9, 2002 - Apr 25, 2003 | -1.98% Sep 17, 2019 - Dec 5, 2019 |
Correlation
Correlation between MUC and FALN is 0.47 which considered as a weak positive correlation - the stocks show a slight tendency to move together.
Dividend Comparison (2000 - 2026)
MUC vs FALN dividend yield comparison.
| Year | MUC | FALN |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 3.50% | 3.81% |
| 2025 | 6.06% | 6.31% |
| 2024 | 5.62% | 6.24% |
| 2023 | 3.84% | 5.37% |
| 2022 | 5.79% | 5.08% |
| 2021 | 4.27% | 3.40% |
| 2020 | 3.96% | 5.14% |
| 2019 | 3.90% | 5.35% |
| 2018 | 4.99% | 5.97% |
| 2017 | 5.14% | 6.98% |
| 2016 | 5.45% | 3.55% |
| 2015 | 5.46% | 0.00% |
| 2014 | 5.85% | 0.00% |
| 2013 | 6.77% | 0.00% |
| 2012 | 5.77% | 0.00% |
| 2011 | 6.16% | 0.00% |
| 2010 | 6.48% | 0.00% |
| 2009 | 5.62% | 0.00% |
| 2008 | 7.13% | 0.00% |
| 2007 | 5.41% | 0.00% |
| 2006 | 5.74% | 0.00% |
| 2005 | 6.08% | 0.00% |
| 2004 | 6.67% | 0.00% |
| 2003 | 6.33% | 0.00% |
| 2002 | 6.46% | 0.00% |
| 2001 | 5.90% | 0.00% |
| 2000 | 2.54% | 0.00% |
Select Stocks to Compare
More Comparisons
Compare with similar stocks