MTG vs FLG
Comparison between MGIC Investment Corp (MTG, Company) and New York Community Bancorp Inc (FLG, Company).
Both MTG and FLG are from the Financial Services sector.
5-Year PerformanceMTG has outperformed FLG, delivering a return of +19.6% compared to -12.9%
MTG vs FLG - Performance Comparison
Key Characteristics
Financial metrics and valuation ratios
MTG vs FLG - Historical Returns
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
MTG vs FLG - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
| Year | MTG | FLG |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | +2.86% | +10.52% |
| 2025 | +26.10% | +36.70% |
| 2024 | +25.41% | -69.65% |
| 2023 | +51.14% | +26.16% |
| 2022 | -8.35% | -25.85% |
| 2021 | +22.26% | +23.21% |
| 2020 | -9.16% | -4.60% |
| 2019 | +36.05% | +33.32% |
| 2018 | -26.65% | -23.52% |
| 2017 | +35.41% | -13.94% |
| 2016 | +18.08% | +4.65% |
| 2015 | -5.66% | +8.63% |
| 2014 | +10.95% | +2.66% |
| 2013 | +183.22% | +34.66% |
| 2012 | -25.91% | +12.20% |
| 2011 | -65.40% | -30.27% |
| 2010 | +64.09% | +38.83% |
| 2009 | +44.50% | +30.55% |
| 2008 | -83.93% | -26.64% |
| 2007 | -64.13% | +15.05% |
| 2006 | -5.43% | +2.79% |
| 2005 | -1.79% | -14.29% |
| 2004 | +22.76% | -23.55% |
| 2003 | +32.55% | +77.44% |
| 2002 | -33.10% | +28.53% |
| 2001 | -3.78% | +45.88% |
| 2000 | +18.46% | +42.77% |
| 1999 | +2.93% | -13.74% |
MTG vs FLG Drawdown Comparison
The maximum drawdown for MTG was -98.86%, occurring on Aug 3, 2012. This drawdown has not yet recovered.
The maximum drawdown for FLG was -80.10%, occurring on Apr 30, 2024. This drawdown has not yet recovered.
The current MTG drawdown is -52.80%. The current FLG drawdown is -64.99%.
| Rank | MTG | FLG |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | -98.86% Jul 13, 2004 - Aug 3, 2012 | -80.10% Jul 31, 2023 - Apr 30, 2024 |
| #2 | -55.93% Jun 27, 2001 - Jul 13, 2004 | -69.83% Feb 27, 2004 - May 4, 2015 |
| #3 | -47.79% Dec 7, 1999 - Sep 8, 2000 | -49.93% Oct 19, 2021 - Jul 27, 2023 |
| #4 | -27.78% Oct 30, 2000 - Jun 6, 2001 | -45.61% Oct 28, 2015 - Oct 7, 2021 |
| #5 | -7.02% Sep 11, 2000 - Oct 25, 2000 | -44.68% Nov 10, 1999 - Dec 4, 2000 |
| #6 | -5.42% Nov 8, 1999 - Dec 7, 1999 | -39.04% Aug 16, 2001 - Aug 8, 2002 |
| #7 | -3.62% Oct 25, 2000 - Oct 27, 2000 | -21.36% Aug 19, 2002 - Apr 10, 2003 |
| #8 | -2.56% Nov 1, 1999 - Nov 8, 1999 | -11.33% Jul 31, 2015 - Oct 23, 2015 |
| #9 | -2.14% Jun 13, 2001 - Jun 15, 2001 | -11.20% Jul 14, 2003 - Sep 23, 2003 |
| #10 | -1.69% Jun 21, 2001 - Jun 27, 2001 | -10.25% Feb 13, 2001 - Mar 28, 2001 |
| #11 | -1.63% Jun 15, 2001 - Jun 21, 2001 | -10.16% Dec 28, 2000 - Jan 29, 2001 |
| #12 | -1.38% Jun 6, 2001 - Jun 13, 2001 | -6.06% Dec 2, 2003 - Jan 14, 2004 |
| #13 | N/A | -6.00% Jun 12, 2003 - Jun 27, 2003 |
| #14 | N/A | -5.09% Sep 23, 2003 - Oct 16, 2003 |
| #15 | N/A | -4.69% Nov 7, 2003 - Nov 25, 2003 |
Correlation
Correlation between MTG and FLG is -0.52 which considered as a moderate negative correlation - the stocks show some tendency to move in opposite directions.
Dividend Comparison (1999 - 2026)
MTG vs FLG dividend yield comparison.
| Year | MTG | FLG |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 1.01% | 0.14% |
| 2025 | 1.92% | 0.32% |
| 2024 | 2.07% | 2.14% |
| 2023 | 2.23% | 6.65% |
| 2022 | 2.77% | 7.91% |
| 2021 | 1.94% | 5.57% |
| 2020 | 1.91% | 6.45% |
| 2019 | 0.85% | 5.66% |
| 2018 | 0.00% | 7.23% |
| 2017 | 0.00% | 5.22% |
| 2016 | 0.00% | 4.27% |
| 2015 | 0.00% | 6.13% |
| 2014 | 0.00% | 6.25% |
| 2013 | 0.00% | 5.93% |
| 2012 | 0.00% | 7.63% |
| 2011 | 0.00% | 8.08% |
| 2010 | 0.00% | 5.31% |
| 2009 | 0.00% | 6.89% |
| 2008 | 2.16% | 8.36% |
| 2007 | 3.46% | 5.69% |
| 2006 | 1.60% | 6.21% |
| 2005 | 0.80% | 6.05% |
| 2004 | 0.33% | 4.67% |
| 2003 | 0.20% | 2.31% |
| 2002 | 0.24% | 2.63% |
| 2001 | 0.16% | 2.35% |
| 2000 | 0.17% | 2.72% |
| 1999 | 0.04% | 0.00% |
Select Stocks to Compare
More Comparisons
Compare with similar stocks