MTG vs CACC

Comparison between MGIC Investment Corp (MTG, Company) and Credit Acceptance Corp (CACC, Company).

Both MTG and CACC are from the Financial Services sector.

5-Year PerformanceMTG has outperformed CACC, delivering a return of +15.5% compared to +5.0%

MTG vs CACC - Performance Comparison

Log

Key Characteristics

Financial metrics and valuation ratios

Metric	MTG(COMPANY)	CACC(COMPANY)
Market Cap	$5.50B	$5.47B
Max Drawdown	98.92%	66.85%
Sharpe Ratio	-0.07	0.33
5Y Beta	0.63	1.17
Industry	Insurance - Specialty	Credit Services
P/E Ratio	8.01	12.49
Forward P/E	8.63	10.75
PEG Ratio	1.76	0.17
Dividend Yield	2.24%	N/A
5Y Dividends CAGR	24.92%	N/A
5Y EPS CAGR	19.56%	0.50%
Debt to Equity	0.00%	0.00%
Free Cash Flow Yield	12.83%	19.24%
P/S Ratio	4.53	4.49
P/B Ratio	1.12	3.68

Market Cap

Winner

MTG

$5.50B

CACC

$5.47B

Max Drawdown

MTG

98.92%

Winner

CACC

66.85%

Sharpe Ratio

MTG

-0.07

Winner

CACC

0.33

5Y Beta

Winner

MTG

0.63

CACC

1.17

Industry

MTG

Insurance - Specialty

CACC

Credit Services

P/E Ratio

Winner

MTG

8.01

CACC

12.49

Forward P/E

Winner

MTG

8.63

CACC

10.75

PEG Ratio

MTG

1.76

Winner

CACC

0.17

Dividend Yield

MTG

2.24%

CACC

N/A

5Y Dividends CAGR

MTG

24.92%

CACC

N/A

5Y EPS CAGR

Winner

MTG

19.56%

CACC

0.50%

Debt to Equity

MTG

0.00%

CACC

0.00%

Free Cash Flow Yield

MTG

12.83%

Winner

CACC

19.24%

P/S Ratio

MTG

4.53

Winner

CACC

4.49

P/B Ratio

Winner

MTG

1.12

CACC

3.68

MTG vs CACC - Historical Returns

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

Period	MTG	CACC
1 month	-6.30%	+0.96%
3 months	+0.61%	+12.82%
6 months	-5.23%	+29.33%
1 year	-0.16%	+9.01%
5 years(CAGR)	+15.50%	+4.96%
10 years(CAGR)	+16.55%	+12.19%
Max(CAGR)	-2.20%	+19.35%

MTG

-6.30%

Winner

CACC

+0.96%

MTG

+0.61%

Winner

CACC

+12.82%

MTG

-5.23%

Winner

CACC

+29.33%

MTG

-0.16%

Winner

CACC

+9.01%

5Y(CAGR)

Winner

MTG

+15.50%

CACC

+4.96%

10Y(CAGR)

Winner

MTG

+16.55%

CACC

+12.19%

Max(CAGR)

MTG

-2.20%

Winner

CACC

+19.35%

MTG vs CACC - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

Year	MTG	CACC
2026	-9.56%	+20.71%
2025	+26.10%	-4.67%
2024	+25.41%	-13.08%
2023	+51.14%	+16.70%
2022	-8.35%	-26.88%
2021	+22.26%	+104.67%
2020	-9.16%	-21.82%
2019	+36.05%	+13.64%
2018	-26.65%	+16.17%
2017	+35.41%	+49.52%
2016	+18.08%	+1.97%
2015	-5.66%	+56.33%
2014	+10.95%	+5.13%
2013	+183.22%	+25.78%
2012	-25.91%	+24.82%
2011	-65.40%	+29.07%
2010	+64.09%	+43.18%
2009	+44.50%	+190.75%
2008	-83.93%	-25.95%
2007	-64.13%	-37.42%
2006	-5.43%	+108.31%
2005	-1.79%	-37.40%
2004	+22.76%	+65.05%
2003	+32.55%	+132.17%
2002	-33.10%	-30.19%
2001	-3.78%	+50.69%
2000	+18.46%	+60.00%
1999	+2.93%	-26.24%

MTG vs CACC Drawdown Comparison

The maximum drawdown for MTG was -98.86%, occurring on Aug 3, 2012. This drawdown has not yet recovered.

The maximum drawdown for CACC was -66.85%, occurring on Mar 26, 2003. Recovery took 386 trading sessions.

The current MTG drawdown is -58.50%. The current CACC drawdown is -21.30%.

Rank	MTG	CACC
#1	-98.86% Jul 13, 2004 - Aug 3, 2012	-66.85% May 17, 2002 - Nov 26, 2003
#2	-55.93% Jun 27, 2001 - Jul 13, 2004	-66.00% Oct 16, 2006 - Oct 7, 2009
#3	-47.79% Dec 7, 1999 - Sep 8, 2000	-56.93% Apr 26, 2019 - Aug 6, 2020
#4	-27.78% Oct 30, 2000 - Jun 6, 2001	-52.09% Dec 29, 2004 - May 3, 2006
#5	-7.02% Sep 11, 2000 - Oct 25, 2000	-45.68% Nov 4, 2021 - Jan 5, 2023
#6	-5.42% Nov 8, 1999 - Dec 7, 1999	-45.03% Aug 10, 2020 - Aug 2, 2021
#7	-3.62% Oct 25, 2000 - Oct 27, 2000	-40.57% Jul 8, 2015 - Aug 2, 2017
#8	-2.56% Nov 1, 1999 - Nov 8, 1999	-38.10% Nov 2, 1999 - Jan 24, 2000
#9	-2.14% Jun 13, 2001 - Jun 15, 2001	-35.68% Aug 21, 2001 - Mar 18, 2002
#10	-1.69% Jun 21, 2001 - Jun 27, 2001	-34.58% Sep 20, 2000 - Jan 5, 2001
#11	-1.63% Jun 15, 2001 - Jun 21, 2001	-33.04% Jul 1, 2011 - Dec 5, 2011
#12	-1.38% Jun 6, 2001 - Jun 13, 2001	-32.73% Jan 11, 2001 - Apr 30, 2001
#13	N/A	-32.52% Mar 29, 2004 - Sep 13, 2004
#14	N/A	-27.27% Jan 24, 2000 - Apr 7, 2000
#15	N/A	-26.72% Jan 29, 2010 - Jul 26, 2010

Correlation

Correlation between MTG and CACC is -0.38 which considered as a weak negative correlation - the stocks show a slight tendency to move in opposite directions.

-0.38

-101