StockComparison Logo
vs

MTB vs NTAP

Comparison between M & T Bank Corp (MTB, Company) and Netapp Inc (NTAP, Company).

MTB is from the Financial Services sector, while NTAP is from the Technology sector.

5-Year PerformanceNTAP has outperformed MTB, delivering a return of +21.2% compared to +16.4%

MTB vs NTAP - Performance Comparison

Key Characteristics

Financial metrics and valuation ratios

Market Cap
Winner
MTB
$37B
NTAP
$37B
Max Drawdown
Winner
MTB
75.55%
NTAP
96.21%
Sharpe Ratio
MTB
1.38
Winner
NTAP
1.64
5Y Beta
Winner
MTB
0.88
NTAP
1.26
Industry
MTB
Banks - Regional
NTAP
Software - Infrastructure
P/E Ratio
Winner
MTB
12.82
NTAP
28.91
Forward P/E
Winner
MTB
13.24
NTAP
20.08
PEG Ratio
Winner
MTB
0.41
NTAP
2.79
Dividend Yield
Winner
MTB
2.37%
NTAP
1.11%
5Y Dividends CAGR
Winner
MTB
10.81%
NTAP
1.40%
5Y EPS CAGR
MTB
6.57%
Winner
NTAP
14.46%
Debt to Equity
Winner
MTB
65.06%
NTAP
184.09%
Free Cash Flow Yield
Winner
MTB
10.35%
NTAP
5.11%
P/S Ratio
Winner
MTB
3.85
NTAP
5.43
P/B Ratio
Winner
MTB
1.44
NTAP
25.93

MTB vs NTAP - Historical Returns

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

1M
MTB
+4.26%
Winner
NTAP
+17.44%
3M
MTB
+15.86%
Winner
NTAP
+71.89%
6M
MTB
+6.56%
Winner
NTAP
+86.80%
1Y
MTB
+38.85%
Winner
NTAP
+88.55%
5Y(CAGR)
MTB
+16.37%
Winner
NTAP
+21.16%
10Y(CAGR)
MTB
+11.05%
Winner
NTAP
+24.61%
Max(CAGR)
MTB
+9.06%
Winner
NTAP
+10.40%

MTB vs NTAP - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

YearMTBNTAP
2026+24.31%+81.31%
2025+10.48%-5.71%
2024+39.71%+37.20%
2023-1.61%+49.33%
2022-5.85%-33.23%
2021+24.76%+45.48%
2020-22.69%+9.14%
2019+20.18%+6.25%
2018-14.69%+9.17%
2017+11.15%+58.58%
2016+36.28%+39.25%
2015-1.12%-34.70%
2014+11.72%+4.23%
2013+18.22%+20.85%
2012+30.33%-8.77%
2011-10.03%-36.82%
2010+34.50%+60.75%
2009+23.24%+132.63%
2008-25.55%-43.26%
2007-31.82%-37.52%
2006+12.19%+40.74%
2005+4.73%-17.43%
2004+12.23%+60.25%
2003+22.06%+91.03%
2002+10.99%-57.95%
2001+13.92%-57.48%
2000+69.50%+51.04%
1999-16.09%+124.49%

MTB vs NTAP Drawdown Comparison

The maximum drawdown for MTB was -73.52%, occurring on Mar 5, 2009. Recovery took 1428 trading sessions.

The maximum drawdown for NTAP was -96.21%, occurring on Oct 8, 2002. Recovery took 5932 trading sessions.

The current MTB drawdown is -1.54%.

RankMTBNTAP
#1-73.52%
Feb 20, 2007 - Oct 17, 2012
-96.21%
Oct 20, 2000 - May 22, 2024
#2-52.97%
Mar 9, 2018 - Jan 7, 2022
-58.09%
Mar 9, 2000 - Sep 18, 2000
#3-40.69%
Sep 12, 2022 - Sep 19, 2024
-42.59%
Jul 10, 2024 - May 22, 2026
#4-28.19%
Nov 25, 2024 - Jan 8, 2026
-22.80%
Sep 22, 2000 - Oct 20, 2000
#5-26.75%
Nov 2, 1999 - Aug 4, 2000
-17.94%
Dec 22, 1999 - Jan 10, 2000
#6-23.95%
May 17, 2002 - May 30, 2003
-16.01%
Jan 18, 2000 - Feb 4, 2000
#7-23.47%
Jul 22, 2015 - Nov 9, 2016
-15.81%
Jun 3, 2026 - Aug 3, 2026
#8-19.77%
Jul 20, 2001 - Mar 14, 2002
-11.77%
Dec 14, 1999 - Dec 22, 1999
#9-18.02%
Feb 16, 2022 - Aug 10, 2022
-11.64%
Nov 29, 1999 - Dec 2, 1999
#10-16.99%
Feb 6, 2026 - Jun 25, 2026
-9.67%
Nov 9, 1999 - Nov 16, 1999
#11-16.08%
Mar 1, 2017 - Dec 1, 2017
-8.00%
Feb 24, 2000 - Mar 6, 2000
#12-15.04%
Dec 30, 2003 - Aug 18, 2004
-6.92%
Jan 10, 2000 - Jan 14, 2000
#13-13.61%
Jan 14, 2022 - Feb 16, 2022
-6.61%
Nov 17, 1999 - Nov 26, 1999
#14-12.43%
Mar 7, 2001 - Mar 30, 2001
-4.62%
Feb 16, 2000 - Feb 23, 2000
#15-12.30%
Dec 5, 2014 - Mar 20, 2015
-4.26%
Feb 11, 2000 - Feb 16, 2000

Correlation

Correlation between MTB and NTAP is 0.82 which considered as a strong positive correlation - the stocks tend to move together.

0.82
-101

Dividend Comparison (1999 - 2026)

MTB vs NTAP dividend yield comparison.

YearMTBNTAP
20261.20%0.81%
20253.24%1.94%
20242.85%1.76%
20233.79%2.27%
20223.31%3.33%
20212.93%2.13%
20203.46%2.90%
20192.42%2.83%
20182.48%2.01%
20171.75%1.41%
20161.79%2.10%
20152.31%2.60%
20142.23%1.52%
20132.41%0.73%
20122.84%0.00%
20113.67%0.00%
20103.22%0.00%
20094.19%0.00%
20084.88%0.00%
20073.19%0.00%
20061.84%0.00%
20051.60%0.00%
20041.48%0.00%
20031.22%0.00%
20021.32%0.00%
20011.37%0.00%
20000.92%0.00%
19990.30%0.00%

Select Stocks to Compare