MTB vs ACGL
Comparison between M & T Bank Corp (MTB, Company) and Arch Capital Group Ltd (ACGL, Company).
Both MTB and ACGL are from the Financial Services sector.
5-Year PerformanceACGL has outperformed MTB, delivering a return of +22.0% compared to +16.6%
MTB vs ACGL - Performance Comparison
Key Characteristics
Financial metrics and valuation ratios
MTB vs ACGL - Historical Returns
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
MTB vs ACGL - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
| Year | MTB | ACGL |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | +23.98% | +7.73% |
| 2025 | +10.48% | +4.97% |
| 2024 | +39.71% | +28.54% |
| 2023 | -1.61% | +18.91% |
| 2022 | -5.85% | +40.92% |
| 2021 | +24.76% | +27.36% |
| 2020 | -22.69% | -16.89% |
| 2019 | +20.18% | +63.76% |
| 2018 | -14.69% | -9.22% |
| 2017 | +11.15% | +5.68% |
| 2016 | +36.28% | +25.33% |
| 2015 | -1.12% | +19.25% |
| 2014 | +11.72% | +3.02% |
| 2013 | +18.22% | +34.50% |
| 2012 | +30.33% | +17.45% |
| 2011 | -10.03% | +26.22% |
| 2010 | +34.50% | +22.38% |
| 2009 | +23.24% | +3.74% |
| 2008 | -25.55% | +2.37% |
| 2007 | -31.82% | +4.29% |
| 2006 | +12.19% | +22.75% |
| 2005 | +4.73% | +43.70% |
| 2004 | +12.23% | -4.21% |
| 2003 | +22.06% | +28.46% |
| 2002 | +10.99% | +17.58% |
| 2001 | +13.92% | +77.59% |
| 2000 | +69.50% | +30.44% |
| 1999 | -16.09% | -3.37% |
MTB vs ACGL Drawdown Comparison
The maximum drawdown for MTB was -73.52%, occurring on Mar 5, 2009. Recovery took 1428 trading sessions.
The maximum drawdown for ACGL was -53.84%, occurring on May 13, 2020. Recovery took 498 trading sessions.
The current MTB drawdown is -1.79%. The current ACGL drawdown is -7.42%.
| Rank | MTB | ACGL |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | -73.52% Feb 20, 2007 - Oct 17, 2012 | -53.84% Feb 19, 2020 - Feb 8, 2022 |
| #2 | -52.97% Mar 9, 2018 - Jan 7, 2022 | -43.95% Sep 19, 2008 - Sep 1, 2010 |
| #3 | -40.69% Sep 12, 2022 - Sep 19, 2024 | -27.33% Oct 23, 2017 - May 3, 2019 |
| #4 | -28.19% Nov 25, 2024 - Jan 8, 2026 | -22.44% Oct 4, 2024 - Oct 28, 2025 |
| #5 | -26.75% Nov 2, 1999 - Aug 4, 2000 | -22.22% Jan 28, 2004 - Jun 29, 2005 |
| #6 | -23.95% May 17, 2002 - May 30, 2003 | -21.95% May 13, 2002 - Nov 18, 2002 |
| #7 | -23.47% Jul 22, 2015 - Nov 9, 2016 | -18.42% Nov 1, 2023 - Mar 11, 2024 |
| #8 | -19.77% Jul 20, 2001 - Mar 14, 2002 | -18.01% Nov 5, 1999 - Jan 13, 2000 |
| #9 | -18.02% Feb 16, 2022 - Aug 10, 2022 | -16.94% Feb 20, 2001 - Sep 5, 2001 |
| #10 | -16.99% Feb 6, 2026 - Jun 25, 2026 | -16.84% Jun 4, 2003 - Nov 4, 2003 |
| #11 | -16.08% Mar 1, 2017 - Dec 1, 2017 | -16.78% Oct 10, 2007 - Sep 19, 2008 |
| #12 | -15.04% Dec 30, 2003 - Aug 18, 2004 | -16.59% Apr 20, 2022 - Oct 27, 2022 |
| #13 | -13.61% Jan 14, 2022 - Feb 16, 2022 | -16.51% Sep 10, 2001 - Oct 24, 2001 |
| #14 | -12.43% Mar 7, 2001 - Mar 30, 2001 | -16.43% Oct 22, 2015 - Aug 16, 2016 |
| #15 | -12.30% Dec 5, 2014 - Mar 20, 2015 | -14.75% Dec 5, 2002 - Mar 19, 2003 |
Correlation
Correlation between MTB and ACGL is 0.89 which considered as a strong positive correlation - the stocks tend to move together.
Dividend Comparison (1999 - 2026)
MTB vs ACGL dividend yield comparison.
| Year | MTB | ACGL |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 1.20% | 0.00% |
| 2025 | 3.24% | 0.00% |
| 2024 | 2.85% | 5.41% |
| 2023 | 3.79% | 0.00% |
| 2022 | 3.31% | 0.00% |
| 2021 | 2.93% | 0.00% |
| 2020 | 3.46% | 0.00% |
| 2019 | 2.42% | 0.00% |
| 2018 | 2.48% | 0.00% |
| 2017 | 1.75% | 0.00% |
| 2016 | 1.79% | 0.00% |
| 2015 | 2.31% | 0.00% |
| 2014 | 2.23% | 0.00% |
| 2013 | 2.41% | 0.00% |
| 2012 | 2.84% | 0.00% |
| 2011 | 3.67% | 0.00% |
| 2010 | 3.22% | 0.00% |
| 2009 | 4.19% | 0.00% |
| 2008 | 4.88% | 0.00% |
| 2007 | 3.19% | 0.00% |
| 2006 | 1.84% | 0.00% |
| 2005 | 1.60% | 0.00% |
| 2004 | 1.48% | 0.00% |
| 2003 | 1.22% | 0.00% |
| 2002 | 1.32% | 0.00% |
| 2001 | 1.37% | 0.00% |
| 2000 | 0.92% | 0.00% |
| 1999 | 0.30% | 0.00% |
Select Stocks to Compare
More Comparisons
Compare with similar stocks