MT vs TAK
Comparison between ArcelorMittal (MT, Company) and Takeda Pharmaceutical Company (TAK, Company).
MT is from the Basic Materials sector, while TAK is from the Healthcare sector.
5-Year PerformanceMT has outperformed TAK, delivering a return of +18.1% compared to +2.5%
MT vs TAK - Performance Comparison
Key Characteristics
Financial metrics and valuation ratios
MT vs TAK - Historical Returns
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
MT vs TAK - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
| Year | MT | TAK |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | +34.73% | +1.41% |
| 2025 | +102.52% | +22.99% |
| 2024 | -16.41% | -3.61% |
| 2023 | +8.57% | -5.85% |
| 2022 | -17.23% | +18.65% |
| 2021 | +34.13% | -22.56% |
| 2020 | +29.31% | -6.18% |
| 2019 | -12.23% | +22.51% |
| 2018 | -39.18% | -39.08% |
| 2017 | +43.41% | +41.14% |
| 2016 | +137.07% | -12.79% |
| 2015 | -60.43% | +24.83% |
| 2014 | -36.59% | -6.18% |
| 2013 | +2.53% | +5.60% |
| 2012 | -8.10% | +4.65% |
| 2011 | -48.80% | -6.27% |
| 2010 | -19.09% | +18.84% |
| 2009 | +79.03% | -18.93% |
| 2008 | -66.82% | +16.78% |
| 2007 | +93.01% | N/A |
| 2006 | +69.10% | N/A |
| 2005 | -26.22% | N/A |
| 2004 | +329.92% | N/A |
| 2003 | +299.55% | N/A |
| 2002 | +18.92% | N/A |
| 2001 | -36.36% | N/A |
| 2000 | -85.71% | N/A |
| 1999 | +50.80% | N/A |
MT vs TAK Drawdown Comparison
The maximum drawdown for MT was -96.35%, occurring on Feb 11, 2016. This drawdown has not yet recovered.
The maximum drawdown for TAK was -54.24%, occurring on Mar 18, 2020. This drawdown has not yet recovered.
The current MT drawdown is -63.18%. The current TAK drawdown is -30.46%.
| Rank | MT | TAK |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | -96.35% Jun 5, 2008 - Feb 11, 2016 | -54.24% Jan 26, 2018 - Mar 18, 2020 |
| #2 | -95.62% Jan 14, 2000 - Aug 2, 2004 | -42.78% Jan 2, 2009 - Feb 28, 2011 |
| #3 | -46.40% Feb 25, 2005 - May 8, 2006 | -22.11% Mar 6, 2015 - May 17, 2017 |
| #4 | -28.64% May 8, 2006 - Oct 19, 2006 | -21.72% Apr 25, 2013 - Mar 3, 2015 |
| #5 | -28.56% Oct 29, 2007 - Apr 4, 2008 | -17.62% Sep 29, 2011 - Jul 18, 2012 |
| #6 | -27.60% Dec 1, 2004 - Feb 25, 2005 | -13.73% Oct 30, 2008 - Dec 30, 2008 |
| #7 | -22.91% Oct 6, 2004 - Oct 26, 2004 | -10.93% Feb 28, 2011 - Sep 27, 2011 |
| #8 | -20.72% Jul 12, 2007 - Sep 14, 2007 | -8.91% Mar 27, 2013 - Apr 24, 2013 |
| #9 | -12.06% Sep 13, 2004 - Oct 4, 2004 | -5.74% Sep 24, 2012 - Jan 11, 2013 |
| #10 | -10.37% Dec 7, 1999 - Dec 21, 1999 | -5.57% Nov 1, 2017 - Dec 26, 2017 |
| #11 | -9.62% Aug 10, 2004 - Sep 7, 2004 | -5.22% Jan 30, 2013 - Feb 22, 2013 |
| #12 | -8.75% Feb 26, 2007 - Mar 26, 2007 | -5.22% Jun 5, 2017 - Jul 28, 2017 |
| #13 | -7.75% Dec 11, 2006 - Jan 23, 2007 | -3.93% Sep 11, 2017 - Oct 4, 2017 |
| #14 | -6.91% Jun 21, 2007 - Jul 9, 2007 | -2.91% Jan 10, 2018 - Jan 23, 2018 |
| #15 | -6.66% Oct 26, 2006 - Dec 11, 2006 | -2.79% Jul 18, 2012 - Aug 7, 2012 |
Correlation
Correlation between MT and TAK is -0.29 which considered as a very weak or no correlation - the stocks move independently of each other.
Dividend Comparison (2005 - 2026)
MT vs TAK dividend yield comparison.
| Year | MT | TAK |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 0.47% | 0.00% |
| 2025 | 1.21% | 4.24% |
| 2024 | 2.16% | 4.67% |
| 2023 | 1.55% | 4.41% |
| 2022 | 1.45% | 4.23% |
| 2021 | 0.94% | 2.98% |
| 2020 | 0.00% | 2.30% |
| 2019 | 1.14% | 4.20% |
| 2018 | 0.48% | 4.77% |
| 2017 | 0.00% | 2.81% |
| 2016 | 0.00% | 3.99% |
| 2015 | 4.03% | 2.92% |
| 2014 | 1.54% | 3.96% |
| 2013 | 1.91% | 3.88% |
| 2012 | 3.65% | 5.00% |
| 2011 | 3.51% | 5.14% |
| 2010 | 1.67% | 2.19% |
| 2009 | 1.39% | 4.87% |
| 2008 | 6.48% | 0.00% |
| 2007 | 1.43% | 0.00% |
| 2006 | 5.41% | 0.00% |
| 2005 | 3.32% | 0.00% |
Select Stocks to Compare
More Comparisons
Compare with similar stocks